闭环:通过应用全面的四步审查法加强药学博士课程的质量

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102151
Lobna Aljuffali , Amjad Faihan BinLebdah , Rihaf Alfaraj , Dalal Alkhelb , Jawza F. Alsabhan , Ahmed Z. Alanazi , Khalid Alhazzani
{"title":"闭环:通过应用全面的四步审查法加强药学博士课程的质量","authors":"Lobna Aljuffali ,&nbsp;Amjad Faihan BinLebdah ,&nbsp;Rihaf Alfaraj ,&nbsp;Dalal Alkhelb ,&nbsp;Jawza F. Alsabhan ,&nbsp;Ahmed Z. Alanazi ,&nbsp;Khalid Alhazzani","doi":"10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the course review process implemented by the College of Pharmacy at King Saud University for its Pharm.D. program. Through a qualitative research design, a dedicated course review committee was established to oversee the evaluation process. The committee gathered and analyzed data from various sources, including course reports, student evaluations, and exam center reports, to achieve a holistic understanding of each course’s effectiveness. The evaluation process was structured into a Four-Step Course Evaluation Approach: data collection, data review and recommendations, taking appropriate action, and communicating the outcomes. The “closing the loop” stage ensured that recommendations were effectively implemented, and course evaluation data were systematically archived for future reference. The results of this study, based on the evaluation of 25 courses, revealed significant improvements in course quality, alignment with program learning outcomes, and adherence to accreditation standards. Key findings included the identification of gaps and discrepancies, leading to targeted interventions and enhanced course content. Overall, this study highlights the effectiveness of a structured course review process in enhancing the quality of education and ensuring continuous improvement within the college. The committee focuses on refining evaluation criteria, conducting workshops, and providing training to stay current with emerging accreditation standards and best practices. This systematic course review process demonstrates the College’s commitment to providing high-quality education and preparing students for successful careers in pharmacy, with significant implications for the improvement of pharmacy education and the overall student learning experience.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49257,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","volume":"32 9","pages":"Article 102151"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424002019/pdfft?md5=f3ce18a8cfe7a433e00b35bb41aa57db&pid=1-s2.0-S1319016424002019-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Closing the loop: Strengthening course quality of Pharm.D. program via applying a comprehensive four-step review approach\",\"authors\":\"Lobna Aljuffali ,&nbsp;Amjad Faihan BinLebdah ,&nbsp;Rihaf Alfaraj ,&nbsp;Dalal Alkhelb ,&nbsp;Jawza F. Alsabhan ,&nbsp;Ahmed Z. Alanazi ,&nbsp;Khalid Alhazzani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsps.2024.102151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study explores the course review process implemented by the College of Pharmacy at King Saud University for its Pharm.D. program. Through a qualitative research design, a dedicated course review committee was established to oversee the evaluation process. The committee gathered and analyzed data from various sources, including course reports, student evaluations, and exam center reports, to achieve a holistic understanding of each course’s effectiveness. The evaluation process was structured into a Four-Step Course Evaluation Approach: data collection, data review and recommendations, taking appropriate action, and communicating the outcomes. The “closing the loop” stage ensured that recommendations were effectively implemented, and course evaluation data were systematically archived for future reference. The results of this study, based on the evaluation of 25 courses, revealed significant improvements in course quality, alignment with program learning outcomes, and adherence to accreditation standards. Key findings included the identification of gaps and discrepancies, leading to targeted interventions and enhanced course content. Overall, this study highlights the effectiveness of a structured course review process in enhancing the quality of education and ensuring continuous improvement within the college. The committee focuses on refining evaluation criteria, conducting workshops, and providing training to stay current with emerging accreditation standards and best practices. This systematic course review process demonstrates the College’s commitment to providing high-quality education and preparing students for successful careers in pharmacy, with significant implications for the improvement of pharmacy education and the overall student learning experience.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"volume\":\"32 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 102151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424002019/pdfft?md5=f3ce18a8cfe7a433e00b35bb41aa57db&pid=1-s2.0-S1319016424002019-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424002019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319016424002019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了沙特国王大学药学院为其药学博士课程实施的课程审查程序。通过定性研究设计,成立了一个专门的课程审查委员会来监督评估过程。委员会收集并分析了来自课程报告、学生评价和考试中心报告等不同来源的数据,以全面了解每门课程的有效性。评估过程分为 "课程评估四步法":数据收集、数据审查和建议、采取适当行动和通报评估结果。闭环 "阶段确保各项建议得到有效实施,课程评估数据得到系统存档,以备将来参考。这项研究以 25 门课程的评估为基础,其结果显示,课程质量、与课程学习成果的一致性以及对认证标准的遵守情况都有了显著改善。主要发现包括找出差距和差异,从而采取有针对性的干预措施和改进课程内容。总之,这项研究强调了结构化课程审查过程在提高教育质量和确保学院持续改进方面的有效性。委员会的工作重点是完善评估标准、举办研讨会和提供培训,以跟上新出现的评审标准和最佳实践。这一系统化的课程评审流程表明,学院致力于提供高质量的教育,为学生在药剂学领域成功就业做好准备,这对改善药剂学教育和学生的整体学习体验具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Closing the loop: Strengthening course quality of Pharm.D. program via applying a comprehensive four-step review approach

This study explores the course review process implemented by the College of Pharmacy at King Saud University for its Pharm.D. program. Through a qualitative research design, a dedicated course review committee was established to oversee the evaluation process. The committee gathered and analyzed data from various sources, including course reports, student evaluations, and exam center reports, to achieve a holistic understanding of each course’s effectiveness. The evaluation process was structured into a Four-Step Course Evaluation Approach: data collection, data review and recommendations, taking appropriate action, and communicating the outcomes. The “closing the loop” stage ensured that recommendations were effectively implemented, and course evaluation data were systematically archived for future reference. The results of this study, based on the evaluation of 25 courses, revealed significant improvements in course quality, alignment with program learning outcomes, and adherence to accreditation standards. Key findings included the identification of gaps and discrepancies, leading to targeted interventions and enhanced course content. Overall, this study highlights the effectiveness of a structured course review process in enhancing the quality of education and ensuring continuous improvement within the college. The committee focuses on refining evaluation criteria, conducting workshops, and providing training to stay current with emerging accreditation standards and best practices. This systematic course review process demonstrates the College’s commitment to providing high-quality education and preparing students for successful careers in pharmacy, with significant implications for the improvement of pharmacy education and the overall student learning experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal
Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.40%
发文量
194
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal (SPJ) is the official journal of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society (SPS) publishing high quality clinically oriented submissions which encompass the various disciplines of pharmaceutical sciences and related subjects. SPJ publishes 8 issues per year by the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, with the cooperation of the College of Pharmacy, King Saud University.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of Anabolic-androgenic steroid supplementation on female health and offspring: Mechanisms, side effects, and medical perspectives Bioadhesive hybrid system of niosomes and pH sensitive in situ gel for itraconazole ocular delivery: Dual approach for efficient treatment of fungal infections Budget impact analysis of baricitinib for treatment of alopecia areata: A Saudi hospital perspective Real-World safety and effectiveness of evolocumab in primary hypercholesterolemia and mixed dyslipidemia in Saudi Arabia Inside Front Cover - Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1