Betty Jo Barrett , Amy Fitzgerald , Huda Al-Wahsh , Mohamad Musa
{"title":"动物陪伴与社会心理健康:一项针对居住在社区的加拿大老年人的全国性研究结果","authors":"Betty Jo Barrett , Amy Fitzgerald , Huda Al-Wahsh , Mohamad Musa","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A growing body of evidence has provided support for the beneficial impact of human-animal interactions on a range of biological, social, and psychological outcomes for humans; however, less is conclusively known about the association between animal companionship and psycho-social health specifically among aging populations. In this study, we assessed the association between animal companionship and psycho-social well-being in a large sample (<em>N</em> = 30,865) of community dwelling Canadians aged 45 and older. Using cross-sectional data from the Canadian Community Health Survey-Healthy Aging, we conducted hierarchical multiple regression to assess the relationship between animal companionship and four domains of psycho-social well-being (satisfaction with life, loneliness, depression, and levels of social support) after controlling for socio-demographic factors and psycho-social measures. Results indicate that those with animal companionship report significantly higher levels of social support than aging Canadians without animal companionship; however, animal companionship was also associated with significantly lower levels of life satisfaction and higher levels of both loneliness and depression. These findings complicate the existing literature on human-animal interactions by suggesting the benefits associated with animal companionship may vary across distinct domains of psycho-social health. As such, results from this study highlight the need for more nuanced model specifications when assessing the relationship between animal companionship and psycho-social well-being. Implications of these findings for the provision of social services to older adults with pets are provided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Animal companionship and psycho-social well-being: Findings from a national study of community-dwelling aging Canadians\",\"authors\":\"Betty Jo Barrett , Amy Fitzgerald , Huda Al-Wahsh , Mohamad Musa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A growing body of evidence has provided support for the beneficial impact of human-animal interactions on a range of biological, social, and psychological outcomes for humans; however, less is conclusively known about the association between animal companionship and psycho-social health specifically among aging populations. In this study, we assessed the association between animal companionship and psycho-social well-being in a large sample (<em>N</em> = 30,865) of community dwelling Canadians aged 45 and older. Using cross-sectional data from the Canadian Community Health Survey-Healthy Aging, we conducted hierarchical multiple regression to assess the relationship between animal companionship and four domains of psycho-social well-being (satisfaction with life, loneliness, depression, and levels of social support) after controlling for socio-demographic factors and psycho-social measures. Results indicate that those with animal companionship report significantly higher levels of social support than aging Canadians without animal companionship; however, animal companionship was also associated with significantly lower levels of life satisfaction and higher levels of both loneliness and depression. These findings complicate the existing literature on human-animal interactions by suggesting the benefits associated with animal companionship may vary across distinct domains of psycho-social health. As such, results from this study highlight the need for more nuanced model specifications when assessing the relationship between animal companionship and psycho-social well-being. Implications of these findings for the provision of social services to older adults with pets are provided.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aging Studies\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101247\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aging Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000422\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406524000422","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
越来越多的证据表明,人与动物的互动对人类的一系列生理、社会和心理结果都有有益的影响;然而,人们对动物陪伴与社会心理健康之间的关系,尤其是老龄人口之间的关系却知之甚少。在这项研究中,我们对45岁及以上居住在社区的加拿大人中的一个大样本(N = 30,865)进行了动物陪伴与社会心理健康之间关系的评估。利用《加拿大社区健康调查--健康老龄化》(Canadian Community Health Survey-Healthy Aging)的横截面数据,我们进行了分层多元回归,以评估在控制了社会人口因素和社会心理测量后,动物陪伴与社会心理健康四个领域(生活满意度、孤独感、抑郁和社会支持水平)之间的关系。结果表明,与没有动物陪伴的加拿大老年人相比,有动物陪伴的加拿大老年人的社会支持水平明显更高;但是,动物陪伴也与生活满意度明显较低、孤独感和抑郁水平较高有关。这些发现使现有关于人与动物互动的文献变得更加复杂,因为它们表明,在不同的社会心理健康领域,与动物陪伴相关的益处可能会有所不同。因此,本研究的结果突出表明,在评估动物陪伴与社会心理健康之间的关系时,需要更细致的模型规范。这些研究结果对于为养宠物的老年人提供社会服务具有重要意义。
Animal companionship and psycho-social well-being: Findings from a national study of community-dwelling aging Canadians
A growing body of evidence has provided support for the beneficial impact of human-animal interactions on a range of biological, social, and psychological outcomes for humans; however, less is conclusively known about the association between animal companionship and psycho-social health specifically among aging populations. In this study, we assessed the association between animal companionship and psycho-social well-being in a large sample (N = 30,865) of community dwelling Canadians aged 45 and older. Using cross-sectional data from the Canadian Community Health Survey-Healthy Aging, we conducted hierarchical multiple regression to assess the relationship between animal companionship and four domains of psycho-social well-being (satisfaction with life, loneliness, depression, and levels of social support) after controlling for socio-demographic factors and psycho-social measures. Results indicate that those with animal companionship report significantly higher levels of social support than aging Canadians without animal companionship; however, animal companionship was also associated with significantly lower levels of life satisfaction and higher levels of both loneliness and depression. These findings complicate the existing literature on human-animal interactions by suggesting the benefits associated with animal companionship may vary across distinct domains of psycho-social health. As such, results from this study highlight the need for more nuanced model specifications when assessing the relationship between animal companionship and psycho-social well-being. Implications of these findings for the provision of social services to older adults with pets are provided.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.