评估不丹纯母乳喂养做法的多中心调查

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101744
Deki Pem , Tandin Zam , Sonam Wangmo , Genden Zangmo , Shinobu Sakurai , Jun Ueki , Ritsuko Wakabayashi
{"title":"评估不丹纯母乳喂养做法的多中心调查","authors":"Deki Pem ,&nbsp;Tandin Zam ,&nbsp;Sonam Wangmo ,&nbsp;Genden Zangmo ,&nbsp;Shinobu Sakurai ,&nbsp;Jun Ueki ,&nbsp;Ritsuko Wakabayashi","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) can reduce illnesses and death in infants. Globally, there has been a slow uptake in EBF despite 30 years of evidence on the benefits of breastfeeding for both infants and mothers. The Royal Government of Bhutan has committed to rising the EBF rate, which was 51.4 % in 2015. Therefore, we seek to investigate the current situation of EBF in Bhutan and identify the underlying factors that influence breastfeeding practices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional survey was conducted on mothers with children aged 0–6 months, who visited one of the participating referral hospitals. Participants were divided into the EBF group if they fed their infant only breast milk, or the non-EBF group if their infant was fed other liquids or solids in addition to breast milk. The nutrition-related knowledge, attitude, and practice questionnaire; the Iowa infant feeding attitude scale; and the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form were used to assess breastfeeding practices.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 483 mothers included, 324 (67 %) exclusively breastfed their babies. The EBF and non-EBF groups displayed significant differences for referral hospitals (p = 0.002) and for the duration of maternity leave (p = 0.002). Although knowledge of EBF was significantly lower in the EBF group (p = 0.040), self-efficacy was significantly higher (p = 0.028).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study revealed an increase in the EBF rate compared to the 2015 report. Further propagation and strengthening of EBF practices might be accomplished through improvements in the self-efficacy of the mother.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002409/pdfft?md5=ebfb8abc5fbdc7180ec44fec45dbd134&pid=1-s2.0-S2213398424002409-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicentre survey to assess exclusive breastfeeding practices in Bhutan\",\"authors\":\"Deki Pem ,&nbsp;Tandin Zam ,&nbsp;Sonam Wangmo ,&nbsp;Genden Zangmo ,&nbsp;Shinobu Sakurai ,&nbsp;Jun Ueki ,&nbsp;Ritsuko Wakabayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cegh.2024.101744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) can reduce illnesses and death in infants. Globally, there has been a slow uptake in EBF despite 30 years of evidence on the benefits of breastfeeding for both infants and mothers. The Royal Government of Bhutan has committed to rising the EBF rate, which was 51.4 % in 2015. Therefore, we seek to investigate the current situation of EBF in Bhutan and identify the underlying factors that influence breastfeeding practices.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cross-sectional survey was conducted on mothers with children aged 0–6 months, who visited one of the participating referral hospitals. Participants were divided into the EBF group if they fed their infant only breast milk, or the non-EBF group if their infant was fed other liquids or solids in addition to breast milk. The nutrition-related knowledge, attitude, and practice questionnaire; the Iowa infant feeding attitude scale; and the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form were used to assess breastfeeding practices.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 483 mothers included, 324 (67 %) exclusively breastfed their babies. The EBF and non-EBF groups displayed significant differences for referral hospitals (p = 0.002) and for the duration of maternity leave (p = 0.002). Although knowledge of EBF was significantly lower in the EBF group (p = 0.040), self-efficacy was significantly higher (p = 0.028).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study revealed an increase in the EBF rate compared to the 2015 report. Further propagation and strengthening of EBF practices might be accomplished through improvements in the self-efficacy of the mother.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002409/pdfft?md5=ebfb8abc5fbdc7180ec44fec45dbd134&pid=1-s2.0-S2213398424002409-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398424002409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景纯母乳喂养(EBF)可以减少婴儿患病和死亡。在全球范围内,尽管已有30年的证据表明母乳喂养对婴儿和母亲都有好处,但纯母乳喂养的普及率却一直很低。不丹王国政府已承诺提高母乳喂养率,2015 年的母乳喂养率为 51.4%。因此,我们试图调查不丹母乳喂养的现状,并找出影响母乳喂养做法的潜在因素。方法这项横断面调查的对象是有 0-6 个月大婴儿的母亲,她们都曾到其中一家参与调查的转诊医院就诊。只喂养母乳的母亲被分为母乳喂养组,除母乳外还喂养其他液体或固体食物的母亲被分为非母乳喂养组。与营养相关的知识、态度和实践问卷、爱荷华婴儿喂养态度量表和母乳喂养自我效能感量表(简表)用于评估母乳喂养实践。纯母乳喂养组和非纯母乳喂养组在转诊医院(p = 0.002)和产假时间(p = 0.002)方面存在显著差异。虽然 EBF 组对 EBF 的了解程度明显较低(p = 0.040),但自我效能感明显较高(p = 0.028)。通过提高母亲的自我效能感,可进一步推广和加强EBF实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A multicentre survey to assess exclusive breastfeeding practices in Bhutan

Background

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) can reduce illnesses and death in infants. Globally, there has been a slow uptake in EBF despite 30 years of evidence on the benefits of breastfeeding for both infants and mothers. The Royal Government of Bhutan has committed to rising the EBF rate, which was 51.4 % in 2015. Therefore, we seek to investigate the current situation of EBF in Bhutan and identify the underlying factors that influence breastfeeding practices.

Methods

This cross-sectional survey was conducted on mothers with children aged 0–6 months, who visited one of the participating referral hospitals. Participants were divided into the EBF group if they fed their infant only breast milk, or the non-EBF group if their infant was fed other liquids or solids in addition to breast milk. The nutrition-related knowledge, attitude, and practice questionnaire; the Iowa infant feeding attitude scale; and the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale - Short Form were used to assess breastfeeding practices.

Results

Of the 483 mothers included, 324 (67 %) exclusively breastfed their babies. The EBF and non-EBF groups displayed significant differences for referral hospitals (p = 0.002) and for the duration of maternity leave (p = 0.002). Although knowledge of EBF was significantly lower in the EBF group (p = 0.040), self-efficacy was significantly higher (p = 0.028).

Conclusion

This study revealed an increase in the EBF rate compared to the 2015 report. Further propagation and strengthening of EBF practices might be accomplished through improvements in the self-efficacy of the mother.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of sonographic score and Bishop score in the prediction of successful labor induction in term patients: A prospective observational study Seroprevalence of strongyloidiasis and toxocariasis among hypereosinophilic patients seeking care at diagnostic centers in Tehran, Iran Educational intervention to raise awareness and foster responsibility for Chagas disease risk factors in the rural community of Texca, Guerrero, Mexico.” Circulating respiratory viruses including SARS-CoV-2 during 2021–2022 season in Tunisia: Epidemiological and dynamic changes Arabic validation and cross-cultural adaptation of climate anxiety scale
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1