加强南非农业的减排:碳信用额在激励气候智能型农业实践中的关键作用

IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100260
L. Hayo , H. Hasegawa
{"title":"加强南非农业的减排:碳信用额在激励气候智能型农业实践中的关键作用","authors":"L. Hayo ,&nbsp;H. Hasegawa","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agriculture faces environmental threats caused by climate change, exacerbated by greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). As a result, climate change is a pressing issue for agriculture, necessitating strategies like carbon credits to mitigate emissions and enhance productivity. Carbon credits are recognized as a prominent avenue for reducing emissions, as highlighted in the 2023 Climate Change Conference (COP28). However, research on carbon credit targeting non-CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from agriculture is limited. Thus, this study employed stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to examine panel data from 1991 to 2020, focusing on the effectiveness of climate-smart agriculture in reducing South African agricultural GHG emissions. The data included non-mechanical agricultural emissions sources, paying attention to emissions from crops and livestock. The findings supported the hypothesis, suggesting that increasing incentives, specifically carbon credits, can raise agricultural productivity while reducing emissions. The study also found that inefficiencies in agriculture significantly impact farm output and emissions. The results indicate that offering GHG carbon credits for agriculture promotes sustainable practices, as methane and nitrous oxide emissions are short-lived and can help reduce climate change impact through carbon sequestration. Prioritizing on-farm emissions, soil fertility improvement, reduced fertilizer use, and better livestock management can lead to positive change through climate-smart farming practices. Therefore, promoting customized GHG credits for agriculture mechanisms can lead to positive change through climate-smart farming practices. Thus, it is necessary to enhance mitigation strategies, policies, and farm practices. Finally, the study emphasizes the significance of evidence-based GHG credits for agriculture mechanisms policies and the need for future research into ways to persuade farmers to participate in the carbon credit market.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824001102/pdfft?md5=9cb0707425951ca5b51d6dd2e938d499&pid=1-s2.0-S2666188824001102-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing emission reductions in South African agriculture: The crucial role of carbon credits in incentivizing climate-smart farming practices\",\"authors\":\"L. Hayo ,&nbsp;H. Hasegawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Agriculture faces environmental threats caused by climate change, exacerbated by greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). As a result, climate change is a pressing issue for agriculture, necessitating strategies like carbon credits to mitigate emissions and enhance productivity. Carbon credits are recognized as a prominent avenue for reducing emissions, as highlighted in the 2023 Climate Change Conference (COP28). However, research on carbon credit targeting non-CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from agriculture is limited. Thus, this study employed stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to examine panel data from 1991 to 2020, focusing on the effectiveness of climate-smart agriculture in reducing South African agricultural GHG emissions. The data included non-mechanical agricultural emissions sources, paying attention to emissions from crops and livestock. The findings supported the hypothesis, suggesting that increasing incentives, specifically carbon credits, can raise agricultural productivity while reducing emissions. The study also found that inefficiencies in agriculture significantly impact farm output and emissions. The results indicate that offering GHG carbon credits for agriculture promotes sustainable practices, as methane and nitrous oxide emissions are short-lived and can help reduce climate change impact through carbon sequestration. Prioritizing on-farm emissions, soil fertility improvement, reduced fertilizer use, and better livestock management can lead to positive change through climate-smart farming practices. Therefore, promoting customized GHG credits for agriculture mechanisms can lead to positive change through climate-smart farming practices. Thus, it is necessary to enhance mitigation strategies, policies, and farm practices. Finally, the study emphasizes the significance of evidence-based GHG credits for agriculture mechanisms policies and the need for future research into ways to persuade farmers to participate in the carbon credit market.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824001102/pdfft?md5=9cb0707425951ca5b51d6dd2e938d499&pid=1-s2.0-S2666188824001102-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824001102\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824001102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

农业面临着气候变化造成的环境威胁,而温室气体排放又加剧了这一威胁。因此,气候变化是农业面临的一个紧迫问题,需要采取碳信用额等战略来减少排放和提高生产率。正如 2023 年气候变化大会(COP28)所强调的,碳信用被认为是减排的一个重要途径。然而,针对农业非二氧化碳排放的碳信用研究还很有限。因此,本研究采用随机前沿分析法(SFA)研究 1991 年至 2020 年的面板数据,重点研究气候智能型农业在减少南非农业温室气体排放方面的效果。数据包括非机械农业排放源,关注作物和牲畜的排放。研究结果支持了这一假设,表明增加激励措施,特别是碳信用额度,可以提高农业生产率,同时减少排放。研究还发现,农业的低效率严重影响了农业产出和排放。研究结果表明,为农业提供温室气体碳信用额可以促进可持续发展,因为甲烷和一氧化二氮的排放是短期的,可以通过碳固存帮助减少气候变化的影响。优先考虑农场排放、提高土壤肥力、减少化肥使用量和改善牲畜管理,可以通过气候智能型农业实践带来积极变化。因此,推广定制的农业温室气体信用额机制可以通过气候智能型农业实践带来积极变化。因此,有必要加强减缓战略、政策和农业实践。最后,本研究强调了以证据为基础的农业温室气体信用额机制政策的重要性,以及未来研究如何说服农民参与碳信用额市场的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Enhancing emission reductions in South African agriculture: The crucial role of carbon credits in incentivizing climate-smart farming practices

Agriculture faces environmental threats caused by climate change, exacerbated by greenhouse gas emissions (GHG). As a result, climate change is a pressing issue for agriculture, necessitating strategies like carbon credits to mitigate emissions and enhance productivity. Carbon credits are recognized as a prominent avenue for reducing emissions, as highlighted in the 2023 Climate Change Conference (COP28). However, research on carbon credit targeting non-CO2 emissions from agriculture is limited. Thus, this study employed stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) to examine panel data from 1991 to 2020, focusing on the effectiveness of climate-smart agriculture in reducing South African agricultural GHG emissions. The data included non-mechanical agricultural emissions sources, paying attention to emissions from crops and livestock. The findings supported the hypothesis, suggesting that increasing incentives, specifically carbon credits, can raise agricultural productivity while reducing emissions. The study also found that inefficiencies in agriculture significantly impact farm output and emissions. The results indicate that offering GHG carbon credits for agriculture promotes sustainable practices, as methane and nitrous oxide emissions are short-lived and can help reduce climate change impact through carbon sequestration. Prioritizing on-farm emissions, soil fertility improvement, reduced fertilizer use, and better livestock management can lead to positive change through climate-smart farming practices. Therefore, promoting customized GHG credits for agriculture mechanisms can lead to positive change through climate-smart farming practices. Thus, it is necessary to enhance mitigation strategies, policies, and farm practices. Finally, the study emphasizes the significance of evidence-based GHG credits for agriculture mechanisms policies and the need for future research into ways to persuade farmers to participate in the carbon credit market.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
期刊最新文献
Decommissioning of a fuel oil-fired thermoelectric power plant in Brazil - Economic feasibility under certain and risk conditions Environmental regulation, R&D subsidies, and industrial green total factor productivity Utilising machine learning for corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) evaluation: Transitioning from committees to climate Spatial inequality in sub-national human development index: A case study of West Bengal districts Public participation in Governance of E-waste recycling: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1