根据可持续发展目标的具体目标 6.4,采用元rontier 网络 DEA 方法进行用水效率评估

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103857
{"title":"根据可持续发展目标的具体目标 6.4,采用元rontier 网络 DEA 方法进行用水效率评估","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The efficient use of water must be enhanced and promoted to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6. Thus, to contribute to the achievement of SDG Target 6.4 and close a research gap in SDGs’ progress, this paper carries out a water usage efficiency analysis of 126 countries leveraging the AQUASTAT database maintained by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), providing information that can help assess and promote the sustainable use and management of water. The methodology uses a conceptual model that considers a Water Withdrawal (WW) stage and a Water Productivity (WP) stage, each one with its own set of variables, designing a customised non-parametric frontier analysis solution that identifies the countries with the best practices and uses them as benchmarks for global efficient water usage. In particular, the proposed approach uses a non-radial Directional Distance Function (DDF) that estimates the inefficiency along the different dimensions, both desirable and undesirable, quantifying potential improvement and computing an efficiency score for each stage and for the whole system. Due to the heterogeneity of the sample, a metafrontier analysis has been carried out. The results indicate that there are significant differences between countries and regions in terms of water usage efficiency. The regions with highest efficiency include Australia, Western and Central Europe and Southern and Eastern Asia, while Central Asia has the lowest. Most of the inefficiency corresponds to the Gross Value Added dimension and the WW stage efficiency is generally higher than that of the WP stage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001916/pdfft?md5=b8545f4546f12975512c92634f63c1d0&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124001916-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A metafrontier network DEA approach for water usage efficiency assessment in the light of SDG target 6.4\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The efficient use of water must be enhanced and promoted to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6. Thus, to contribute to the achievement of SDG Target 6.4 and close a research gap in SDGs’ progress, this paper carries out a water usage efficiency analysis of 126 countries leveraging the AQUASTAT database maintained by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), providing information that can help assess and promote the sustainable use and management of water. The methodology uses a conceptual model that considers a Water Withdrawal (WW) stage and a Water Productivity (WP) stage, each one with its own set of variables, designing a customised non-parametric frontier analysis solution that identifies the countries with the best practices and uses them as benchmarks for global efficient water usage. In particular, the proposed approach uses a non-radial Directional Distance Function (DDF) that estimates the inefficiency along the different dimensions, both desirable and undesirable, quantifying potential improvement and computing an efficiency score for each stage and for the whole system. Due to the heterogeneity of the sample, a metafrontier analysis has been carried out. The results indicate that there are significant differences between countries and regions in terms of water usage efficiency. The regions with highest efficiency include Australia, Western and Central Europe and Southern and Eastern Asia, while Central Asia has the lowest. Most of the inefficiency corresponds to the Gross Value Added dimension and the WW stage efficiency is generally higher than that of the WP stage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001916/pdfft?md5=b8545f4546f12975512c92634f63c1d0&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124001916-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001916\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要实现可持续发展目标(SDG)6,必须提高和促进水资源的有效利用。因此,为了促进可持续发展目标 6.4 的实现并填补可持续发展目标进展方面的研究空白,本文利用联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)维护的 AQUASTAT 数据库对 126 个国家进行了用水效率分析,提供有助于评估和促进水资源可持续利用和管理的信息。该方法采用的概念模型考虑了取水量(WW)阶段和水生产力(WP)阶段,每个阶段都有自己的变量集,设计了一个定制的非参数前沿分析解决方案,以确定具有最佳实践的国家,并将其作为全球高效用水的基准。特别是,所提出的方法使用了非径向定向距离函数(DDF),该函数可估算不同维度的低效率,包括理想的和不理想的效率,量化潜在的改进措施,并计算每个阶段和整个系统的效率得分。由于样本的异质性,我们进行了元前沿分析。结果表明,不同国家和地区在用水效率方面存在显著差异。用水效率最高的地区包括澳大利亚、西欧和中欧、南亚和东亚,而中亚用水效率最低。大部分低效率都与总附加值有关,水 WW 阶段的效率普遍高于水 WP 阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A metafrontier network DEA approach for water usage efficiency assessment in the light of SDG target 6.4

The efficient use of water must be enhanced and promoted to achieve the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 6. Thus, to contribute to the achievement of SDG Target 6.4 and close a research gap in SDGs’ progress, this paper carries out a water usage efficiency analysis of 126 countries leveraging the AQUASTAT database maintained by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), providing information that can help assess and promote the sustainable use and management of water. The methodology uses a conceptual model that considers a Water Withdrawal (WW) stage and a Water Productivity (WP) stage, each one with its own set of variables, designing a customised non-parametric frontier analysis solution that identifies the countries with the best practices and uses them as benchmarks for global efficient water usage. In particular, the proposed approach uses a non-radial Directional Distance Function (DDF) that estimates the inefficiency along the different dimensions, both desirable and undesirable, quantifying potential improvement and computing an efficiency score for each stage and for the whole system. Due to the heterogeneity of the sample, a metafrontier analysis has been carried out. The results indicate that there are significant differences between countries and regions in terms of water usage efficiency. The regions with highest efficiency include Australia, Western and Central Europe and Southern and Eastern Asia, while Central Asia has the lowest. Most of the inefficiency corresponds to the Gross Value Added dimension and the WW stage efficiency is generally higher than that of the WP stage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Attending to the unattended: Why and how do local governments plan for access and functional needs in climate risk reduction? Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research Of heroes and villains – How coalitions shape their narratives and what the public conservation debate is actually about? Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1