伦敦自行车租赁计划十三年的经验教训:证据回顾

{"title":"伦敦自行车租赁计划十三年的经验教训:证据回顾","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.multra.2024.100156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Bicycle sharing has grown rapidly since the 2000s, but there is a lack of thorough retrospective analysis performed from a long-term perspective. This paper takes London as its focus, aiming to evaluate the performance of the London cycle hire (LCH) scheme, draw general practical implications for bicycle sharing, and summarize future research directions. This paper reviews the empirical evidence that has appeared in academic literature, policy documents, and technical reports. Issues covered in this review include: (1) LCH users and demand patterns, (2) substitutability and complementarity with other travel modes, (3) public health impacts, (4) interventions that have affected the usage and demand patterns of LCH, and (5) the impacts of COVID-19. Overall, LCH has achieved its primary goals of promoting cycling and has also brought benefits to public health and urban transportation resilience, and yet some minor problems persist. Practical implications for the implementation, operation, and evaluation of bicycle sharing schemes are offered based on our collection of evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100933,"journal":{"name":"Multimodal Transportation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586324000376/pdfft?md5=dfa0a7eb851f6a8536bcce578b76195a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772586324000376-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons from thirteen years of the London cycle hire scheme: A review of evidence\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.multra.2024.100156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Bicycle sharing has grown rapidly since the 2000s, but there is a lack of thorough retrospective analysis performed from a long-term perspective. This paper takes London as its focus, aiming to evaluate the performance of the London cycle hire (LCH) scheme, draw general practical implications for bicycle sharing, and summarize future research directions. This paper reviews the empirical evidence that has appeared in academic literature, policy documents, and technical reports. Issues covered in this review include: (1) LCH users and demand patterns, (2) substitutability and complementarity with other travel modes, (3) public health impacts, (4) interventions that have affected the usage and demand patterns of LCH, and (5) the impacts of COVID-19. Overall, LCH has achieved its primary goals of promoting cycling and has also brought benefits to public health and urban transportation resilience, and yet some minor problems persist. Practical implications for the implementation, operation, and evaluation of bicycle sharing schemes are offered based on our collection of evidence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Multimodal Transportation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586324000376/pdfft?md5=dfa0a7eb851f6a8536bcce578b76195a&pid=1-s2.0-S2772586324000376-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Multimodal Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586324000376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodal Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772586324000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 2000 年代以来,共享单车发展迅速,但缺乏从长期角度进行的全面回顾性分析。本文以伦敦为中心,旨在评估伦敦自行车租赁(LCH)计划的绩效,得出共享单车的一般实际意义,并总结未来的研究方向。本文回顾了学术文献、政策文件和技术报告中出现的经验证据。回顾中涉及的问题包括(1) LCH 的使用者和需求模式,(2) 与其他出行方式的替代性和互补性,(3) 对公共健康的影响,(4) 影响 LCH 使用和需求模式的干预措施,以及 (5) COVID-19 的影响。总体而言,龙舟赛实现了推广自行车出行的主要目标,也为公共卫生和城市交通弹性带来了益处,但仍存在一些小问题。根据我们收集的证据,我们提出了共享单车计划的实施、运营和评估的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lessons from thirteen years of the London cycle hire scheme: A review of evidence

Bicycle sharing has grown rapidly since the 2000s, but there is a lack of thorough retrospective analysis performed from a long-term perspective. This paper takes London as its focus, aiming to evaluate the performance of the London cycle hire (LCH) scheme, draw general practical implications for bicycle sharing, and summarize future research directions. This paper reviews the empirical evidence that has appeared in academic literature, policy documents, and technical reports. Issues covered in this review include: (1) LCH users and demand patterns, (2) substitutability and complementarity with other travel modes, (3) public health impacts, (4) interventions that have affected the usage and demand patterns of LCH, and (5) the impacts of COVID-19. Overall, LCH has achieved its primary goals of promoting cycling and has also brought benefits to public health and urban transportation resilience, and yet some minor problems persist. Practical implications for the implementation, operation, and evaluation of bicycle sharing schemes are offered based on our collection of evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcement learning in transportation research: Frontiers and future directions Enhancement of the impacts 2050 model to enable a whole system sustainability assessment of rideshare Co-creating multimodal transportation hubs in Switzerland: How to close the gap between actors across different scales, levels, and sectors Exploring micromobility choice behavior across different mode users using machine learning methods Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1