共享单车能否实现自我平衡分配?来自无桩式和站点式案例的证据

IF 5.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Travel Behaviour and Society Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100879
Mingzhuang Hua , Xinlian Yu , Xuewu Chen , Jingxu Chen , Long Cheng
{"title":"共享单车能否实现自我平衡分配?来自无桩式和站点式案例的证据","authors":"Mingzhuang Hua ,&nbsp;Xinlian Yu ,&nbsp;Xuewu Chen ,&nbsp;Jingxu Chen ,&nbsp;Long Cheng","doi":"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In many cities, bike sharing systems, including station-based bike sharing (SBBS) and dockless bike sharing (DBS), are gaining popularity rapidly. Bike rebalancing is one of the most expensive aspects of bike sharing operations, and it takes several hours. In terms of reducing the inefficiencies of frequent short-term bike rebalancing, whether bike distribution achieves long-term self-balance for one day or even longer periods is a critical issue that has received insufficient attention. This paper aims to provide insights into long-term facility planning by investigating the self-balancing phenomenon of shared bikes. It is evaluated using daily stability analyses from the DBS case in Nanjing, China, and the SBBS case in New York, USA. DBS virtual stations were identified throughout the city, and (virtual) stations can be classified into four categories using various clustering methods. The findings demonstrate that 72% of DBS virtual stations and 81% of SBBS stations can achieve bike self-balancing, with only a few (virtual) stations failing to do so. In terms of non-self-balancing stations, bike-increasing stations are primarily located in the city center, whereas bike-fluctuating stations are primarily found near metro lines. This research can assist bike sharing companies with their daily operations and contribute to government management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51534,"journal":{"name":"Travel Behaviour and Society","volume":"38 ","pages":"Article 100879"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X2400142X/pdfft?md5=4989a802d1cc8f73d89c0a3d50f88f90&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X2400142X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can bike sharing achieve self-balancing distribution? Evidence from dockless and station-based cases\",\"authors\":\"Mingzhuang Hua ,&nbsp;Xinlian Yu ,&nbsp;Xuewu Chen ,&nbsp;Jingxu Chen ,&nbsp;Long Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tbs.2024.100879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In many cities, bike sharing systems, including station-based bike sharing (SBBS) and dockless bike sharing (DBS), are gaining popularity rapidly. Bike rebalancing is one of the most expensive aspects of bike sharing operations, and it takes several hours. In terms of reducing the inefficiencies of frequent short-term bike rebalancing, whether bike distribution achieves long-term self-balance for one day or even longer periods is a critical issue that has received insufficient attention. This paper aims to provide insights into long-term facility planning by investigating the self-balancing phenomenon of shared bikes. It is evaluated using daily stability analyses from the DBS case in Nanjing, China, and the SBBS case in New York, USA. DBS virtual stations were identified throughout the city, and (virtual) stations can be classified into four categories using various clustering methods. The findings demonstrate that 72% of DBS virtual stations and 81% of SBBS stations can achieve bike self-balancing, with only a few (virtual) stations failing to do so. In terms of non-self-balancing stations, bike-increasing stations are primarily located in the city center, whereas bike-fluctuating stations are primarily found near metro lines. This research can assist bike sharing companies with their daily operations and contribute to government management.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"volume\":\"38 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100879\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X2400142X/pdfft?md5=4989a802d1cc8f73d89c0a3d50f88f90&pid=1-s2.0-S2214367X2400142X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Behaviour and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X2400142X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Behaviour and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214367X2400142X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在许多城市,共享单车系统,包括站点式共享单车(SBBS)和无桩共享单车(DBS),正在迅速普及。单车调整是共享单车运营中最昂贵的环节之一,需要花费数小时。为了减少短期内频繁调整单车所带来的低效率,单车分布能否实现一天甚至更长时间的长期自我平衡,是一个尚未引起足够重视的关键问题。本文旨在通过研究共享单车的自平衡现象,为长期设施规划提供见解。本文通过对中国南京的 DBS 案例和美国纽约的 SBBS 案例进行日常稳定性分析,对其进行评估。在全市范围内确定了 DBS 虚拟站点,并利用各种聚类方法将(虚拟)站点分为四类。研究结果表明,72% 的 DBS 虚拟站点和 81% 的 SBBS 站点可以实现自行车自平衡,只有少数(虚拟)站点无法实现。就非自平衡站点而言,自行车增加站点主要位于市中心,而自行车波动站点主要位于地铁线附近。这项研究有助于共享单车公司的日常运营,也有助于政府管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can bike sharing achieve self-balancing distribution? Evidence from dockless and station-based cases

In many cities, bike sharing systems, including station-based bike sharing (SBBS) and dockless bike sharing (DBS), are gaining popularity rapidly. Bike rebalancing is one of the most expensive aspects of bike sharing operations, and it takes several hours. In terms of reducing the inefficiencies of frequent short-term bike rebalancing, whether bike distribution achieves long-term self-balance for one day or even longer periods is a critical issue that has received insufficient attention. This paper aims to provide insights into long-term facility planning by investigating the self-balancing phenomenon of shared bikes. It is evaluated using daily stability analyses from the DBS case in Nanjing, China, and the SBBS case in New York, USA. DBS virtual stations were identified throughout the city, and (virtual) stations can be classified into four categories using various clustering methods. The findings demonstrate that 72% of DBS virtual stations and 81% of SBBS stations can achieve bike self-balancing, with only a few (virtual) stations failing to do so. In terms of non-self-balancing stations, bike-increasing stations are primarily located in the city center, whereas bike-fluctuating stations are primarily found near metro lines. This research can assist bike sharing companies with their daily operations and contribute to government management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: Travel Behaviour and Society is an interdisciplinary journal publishing high-quality original papers which report leading edge research in theories, methodologies and applications concerning transportation issues and challenges which involve the social and spatial dimensions. In particular, it provides a discussion forum for major research in travel behaviour, transportation infrastructure, transportation and environmental issues, mobility and social sustainability, transportation geographic information systems (TGIS), transportation and quality of life, transportation data collection and analysis, etc.
期刊最新文献
Investigating the changes in residential location and commute patterns during the pandemic using smart card data Analysing driver behaviour and crash frequency at railway level crossings using connected vehicle and GIS data Sustainable urban mobility transitions through working from home (WFH) An injury severity-based methodology for assessing priority areas for shared micromobility accident risk mitigation Improving conventional transit services with modular autonomous vehicles: A bi-level programming approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1