平衡碳离子放射治疗大型骶骨脊索瘤线性能量转移优化的优势和局限性

Giovanni Parrella , Giuseppe Magro , Agnieszka Chalaszczyk , Marco Rotondi , Mario Ciocca , Lars Glimelius , Maria R. Fiore , Chiara Paganelli , Ester Orlandi , Silvia Molinelli , Guido Baroni
{"title":"平衡碳离子放射治疗大型骶骨脊索瘤线性能量转移优化的优势和局限性","authors":"Giovanni Parrella ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Magro ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Chalaszczyk ,&nbsp;Marco Rotondi ,&nbsp;Mario Ciocca ,&nbsp;Lars Glimelius ,&nbsp;Maria R. Fiore ,&nbsp;Chiara Paganelli ,&nbsp;Ester Orlandi ,&nbsp;Silvia Molinelli ,&nbsp;Guido Baroni","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>A low linear energy transfer (LET) in the target can reduce the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). This study aimed at exploring benefits and limitations of LET optimization for large sacral chordomas (SC) undergoing CIRT.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Seventeen cases were used to tune LET-based optimization, and seven to independently test interfraction plan robustness. For each patient, a reference plan was optimized on biologically-weighted dose cost functions. For the first group, 7 LET-optimized plans were obtained by increasing the gross tumor volume (GTV) minimum LET<sub>d</sub> (minLET<sub>d</sub>) in the range 37–55 keV/μm, in steps of 3 keV/μm. The optimal LET-optimized plan (LET<sub>OPT</sub>) was the one maximizing LET<sub>d,</sub> while adhering to clinical acceptability criteria. Reference and LET<sub>OPT</sub> plans were compared through dose and LETd metrics (D<em><sub>x</sub></em>, L<em><sub>x</sub></em> to x% volume) for the GTV, clinical target volume (CTV), and organs at risk (OARs). The 7 held-out cases were optimized setting minLET<sub>d</sub> to the average GTV L<sub>98%</sub> of the investigation cohort. Both reference and LET<sub>OPT</sub> plans were recalculated on re-evaluation CTs and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>GTV L<sub>98%</sub> increased from (31.8 ± 2.5)keV/μm to (47.6 ± 3.1)keV/μm on the LET<sub>OPT</sub> plans, while the fraction of GTV receiving over 50 keV/μm increased on average by 36% (p &lt; 0.001), without affecting target coverage goals, or impacting LET<sub>d</sub> and dose to OARs. The interfraction analysis showed no significant worsening with minLET<sub>d</sub> set to 48 keV/μm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>LET<sub>d</sub> optimization for large SC could boost the LET<sub>d</sub> in the GTV without significantly compromising plan quality, potentially improving the therapeutic effects of CIRT for large radioresistant tumors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000940/pdfft?md5=be0c154498e3ac43bff0bd6054502b2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000940-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balancing benefits and limitations of linear energy transfer optimization in carbon ion radiotherapy for large sacral chordomas\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Parrella ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Magro ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Chalaszczyk ,&nbsp;Marco Rotondi ,&nbsp;Mario Ciocca ,&nbsp;Lars Glimelius ,&nbsp;Maria R. Fiore ,&nbsp;Chiara Paganelli ,&nbsp;Ester Orlandi ,&nbsp;Silvia Molinelli ,&nbsp;Guido Baroni\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100624\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Purpose</h3><p>A low linear energy transfer (LET) in the target can reduce the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). This study aimed at exploring benefits and limitations of LET optimization for large sacral chordomas (SC) undergoing CIRT.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>Seventeen cases were used to tune LET-based optimization, and seven to independently test interfraction plan robustness. For each patient, a reference plan was optimized on biologically-weighted dose cost functions. For the first group, 7 LET-optimized plans were obtained by increasing the gross tumor volume (GTV) minimum LET<sub>d</sub> (minLET<sub>d</sub>) in the range 37–55 keV/μm, in steps of 3 keV/μm. The optimal LET-optimized plan (LET<sub>OPT</sub>) was the one maximizing LET<sub>d,</sub> while adhering to clinical acceptability criteria. Reference and LET<sub>OPT</sub> plans were compared through dose and LETd metrics (D<em><sub>x</sub></em>, L<em><sub>x</sub></em> to x% volume) for the GTV, clinical target volume (CTV), and organs at risk (OARs). The 7 held-out cases were optimized setting minLET<sub>d</sub> to the average GTV L<sub>98%</sub> of the investigation cohort. Both reference and LET<sub>OPT</sub> plans were recalculated on re-evaluation CTs and compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>GTV L<sub>98%</sub> increased from (31.8 ± 2.5)keV/μm to (47.6 ± 3.1)keV/μm on the LET<sub>OPT</sub> plans, while the fraction of GTV receiving over 50 keV/μm increased on average by 36% (p &lt; 0.001), without affecting target coverage goals, or impacting LET<sub>d</sub> and dose to OARs. The interfraction analysis showed no significant worsening with minLET<sub>d</sub> set to 48 keV/μm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>LET<sub>d</sub> optimization for large SC could boost the LET<sub>d</sub> in the GTV without significantly compromising plan quality, potentially improving the therapeutic effects of CIRT for large radioresistant tumors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000940/pdfft?md5=be0c154498e3ac43bff0bd6054502b2c&pid=1-s2.0-S2405631624000940-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405631624000940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的 靶点线性能量传递(LET)过低会降低碳离子放疗(CIRT)的效果。本研究旨在探索对接受 CIRT 的大型骶脊索瘤(SC)进行 LET 优化的益处和局限性。材料与方法 17 个病例用于调整基于 LET 的优化,7 个病例用于独立测试牵引间计划的稳健性。对每位患者的参考计划都根据生物加权剂量成本函数进行了优化。在第一组中,通过在 37-55 keV/μm 范围内以 3 keV/μm 为单位增加肿瘤总体积(GTV)最小 LETd(minLETd),获得了 7 个 LET 优化计划。最佳 LET 优化计划(LETOPT)是在遵守临床可接受性标准的前提下最大化 LETd 的计划。通过GTV、临床靶体积(CTV)和危险器官(OARs)的剂量和LETd指标(Dx、Lx至x%体积)对参考计划和LETOPT计划进行比较。对 7 例未接受治疗的病例进行了优化,将 minLETd 设置为调查群组的平均 GTV L98%。结果在 LETOPT 计划中,GTV L98% 从 (31.8 ± 2.5)keV/μm 增加到 (47.6 ± 3.1)keV/μm,而 GTV 接收超过 50 keV/μm 的部分平均增加了 36% (p<0.001),但不影响目标覆盖目标,也不影响 OAR 的 LETd 和剂量。结论 对大型 SC 进行 LETd 优化可提高 GTV 中的 LETd,而不会明显影响计划质量,从而有可能改善 CIRT 对大型放射抗性肿瘤的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balancing benefits and limitations of linear energy transfer optimization in carbon ion radiotherapy for large sacral chordomas

Background and Purpose

A low linear energy transfer (LET) in the target can reduce the effectiveness of carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). This study aimed at exploring benefits and limitations of LET optimization for large sacral chordomas (SC) undergoing CIRT.

Materials and Methods

Seventeen cases were used to tune LET-based optimization, and seven to independently test interfraction plan robustness. For each patient, a reference plan was optimized on biologically-weighted dose cost functions. For the first group, 7 LET-optimized plans were obtained by increasing the gross tumor volume (GTV) minimum LETd (minLETd) in the range 37–55 keV/μm, in steps of 3 keV/μm. The optimal LET-optimized plan (LETOPT) was the one maximizing LETd, while adhering to clinical acceptability criteria. Reference and LETOPT plans were compared through dose and LETd metrics (Dx, Lx to x% volume) for the GTV, clinical target volume (CTV), and organs at risk (OARs). The 7 held-out cases were optimized setting minLETd to the average GTV L98% of the investigation cohort. Both reference and LETOPT plans were recalculated on re-evaluation CTs and compared.

Results

GTV L98% increased from (31.8 ± 2.5)keV/μm to (47.6 ± 3.1)keV/μm on the LETOPT plans, while the fraction of GTV receiving over 50 keV/μm increased on average by 36% (p < 0.001), without affecting target coverage goals, or impacting LETd and dose to OARs. The interfraction analysis showed no significant worsening with minLETd set to 48 keV/μm.

Conclusion

LETd optimization for large SC could boost the LETd in the GTV without significantly compromising plan quality, potentially improving the therapeutic effects of CIRT for large radioresistant tumors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Results of 2023 survey on the use of synthetic computed tomography for magnetic resonance Imaging-only radiotherapy: Current status and future steps Head and neck automatic multi-organ segmentation on Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Automatic segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging guided individual elective lymph node irradiation in head and neck cancer patients Development of a novel 3D-printed dynamic anthropomorphic thorax phantom for evaluation of four-dimensional computed tomography Technical feasibility of delivering a simultaneous integrated boost in partial breast irradiation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1