电动汽车的复杂扩散:主导设计视角

IF 4.6 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1109/TEM.2024.3428841
Petra Nylund;Alexander Brem
{"title":"电动汽车的复杂扩散:主导设计视角","authors":"Petra Nylund;Alexander Brem","doi":"10.1109/TEM.2024.3428841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electric vehicle industry is staggering along an arduous path to dominant design and subsequent mass-market reach. We examine technology-specific factors that influence the emergence of a dominant design and posit that the technologies most central to technological and regional innovation are also those furthest away from establishing a dominant design. We find support for our hypothesized model in a panel data analysis of 2958 electric vehicle patents representing the development of 72 technologies over ten years. These technologies are even less likely to have a dominant design when they are complex, i.e., they have many components or interactions. However, for technologies with high innovation performance, the impact of complexity is inverted. Then, technological centrality, i.e., centrality in the technology system, paired with complexity make technologies more likely to converge toward a dominant design. Conversely, technologies with local centrality in a specific region, are more convergent and less complex. These serial interrelations among the antecedents of dominant design provide a more detailed understanding of market-based standardization than previously available. On a practical level, more innovation reduces the barriers generated by complexity. Thus, joint industry-level efforts may be useful to overcome persistent hurdles in the technology life cycle, such as those currently experienced by the electric vehicle industry.","PeriodicalId":55009,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"71 ","pages":"11629-11637"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complex Diffusion of Electric Vehicles: A Dominant Design Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Petra Nylund;Alexander Brem\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TEM.2024.3428841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The electric vehicle industry is staggering along an arduous path to dominant design and subsequent mass-market reach. We examine technology-specific factors that influence the emergence of a dominant design and posit that the technologies most central to technological and regional innovation are also those furthest away from establishing a dominant design. We find support for our hypothesized model in a panel data analysis of 2958 electric vehicle patents representing the development of 72 technologies over ten years. These technologies are even less likely to have a dominant design when they are complex, i.e., they have many components or interactions. However, for technologies with high innovation performance, the impact of complexity is inverted. Then, technological centrality, i.e., centrality in the technology system, paired with complexity make technologies more likely to converge toward a dominant design. Conversely, technologies with local centrality in a specific region, are more convergent and less complex. These serial interrelations among the antecedents of dominant design provide a more detailed understanding of market-based standardization than previously available. On a practical level, more innovation reduces the barriers generated by complexity. Thus, joint industry-level efforts may be useful to overcome persistent hurdles in the technology life cycle, such as those currently experienced by the electric vehicle industry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55009,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"71 \",\"pages\":\"11629-11637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10606439/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10606439/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电动汽车行业正沿着一条艰辛的道路蹒跚前行,以实现主导设计并随后进入大众市场。我们研究了影响主导设计出现的特定技术因素,并假设对技术创新和区域创新最重要的技术也是那些离确立主导设计最远的技术。我们对 2958 项电动汽车专利进行了面板数据分析,发现这些专利代表了 72 项技术在十年间的发展,从而支持了我们的假设模型。当这些技术比较复杂,即有许多组件或相互作用时,其主导设计的可能性就更小。然而,对于创新绩效较高的技术而言,复杂性的影响是反向的。那么,技术中心性(即在技术系统中的中心性)与复杂性的结合就会使技术更有可能向主导设计靠拢。反之,在特定地区具有地方中心地位的技术,其趋同性更高,复杂性更低。主导设计前因之间的这些序列相互关系,为我们提供了对基于市场的标准化的更详细的理解。在实际层面上,更多的创新会减少复杂性带来的障碍。因此,行业层面的联合努力可能有助于克服技术生命周期中持续存在的障碍,例如电动汽车行业目前遇到的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Complex Diffusion of Electric Vehicles: A Dominant Design Perspective
The electric vehicle industry is staggering along an arduous path to dominant design and subsequent mass-market reach. We examine technology-specific factors that influence the emergence of a dominant design and posit that the technologies most central to technological and regional innovation are also those furthest away from establishing a dominant design. We find support for our hypothesized model in a panel data analysis of 2958 electric vehicle patents representing the development of 72 technologies over ten years. These technologies are even less likely to have a dominant design when they are complex, i.e., they have many components or interactions. However, for technologies with high innovation performance, the impact of complexity is inverted. Then, technological centrality, i.e., centrality in the technology system, paired with complexity make technologies more likely to converge toward a dominant design. Conversely, technologies with local centrality in a specific region, are more convergent and less complex. These serial interrelations among the antecedents of dominant design provide a more detailed understanding of market-based standardization than previously available. On a practical level, more innovation reduces the barriers generated by complexity. Thus, joint industry-level efforts may be useful to overcome persistent hurdles in the technology life cycle, such as those currently experienced by the electric vehicle industry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
19.00%
发文量
604
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Management of technical functions such as research, development, and engineering in industry, government, university, and other settings. Emphasis is on studies carried on within an organization to help in decision making or policy formation for RD&E.
期刊最新文献
Data-Driven Identification of Industrial Clusters: A Patent Analysis Approach Cyber Security for Cyber–Physical Systems in Critical Infrastructures: Bibliometrics Analysis and Future Directions Catch-Up in Complex Products and Systems: A Fuzzy-Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of China's Equipment Manufacturing Industry A Decision Framework With q-Rung Fuzzy Preferences for Ranking Barriers Affecting Clean Energy Utilization Within Healthcare Industry Can the Input of Data Elements Improve Manufacturing Productivity? Effect Measurement and Path Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1