高斯图形模型识别的膳食网络与重度抑郁障碍的几率:病例对照研究

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-26 DOI:10.1155/2024/8749041
Hossein Shahinfar, Sakineh Shab-Bidar, Mohammad Effatpanah, Reza Askari, Shima Jazayeri
{"title":"高斯图形模型识别的膳食网络与重度抑郁障碍的几率:病例对照研究","authors":"Hossein Shahinfar,&nbsp;Sakineh Shab-Bidar,&nbsp;Mohammad Effatpanah,&nbsp;Reza Askari,&nbsp;Shima Jazayeri","doi":"10.1155/2024/8749041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. The Gaussian graphical model (GGM) is a new approach that has recently gained attention for identifying dietary patterns. It examines the connections between different food groups and how they are consumed together. The aim of our study was to investigate the link between dietary networks derived from GGM and the odds of major depressive disorder (MDD). <i>Methods</i>. Two hundred drug-free patients with MDD and 200 healthy individuals were enrolled in this age- and sex-matched case-control study. The mean age of the participants was 45.4 years and 67.5% were female. The Beck Depression Inventory-II questionnaire was used for screening depression in the control group. Dietary intake was assessed using a 168-item food frequency questionnaire A GGM was applied to identify dietary networks. The GGM-derived networks were scored, categorized into tertiles, and their association with MDD was determined using a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for energy intake, marital status, job status, income, living status, education, drug use, smoking status, physical activity level, family history of major depressive disorders, comorbidities, and BMI. <i>Results</i>. GGM identified four dietary networks: healthy, prudent, western, and mixed. Nonleafy vegetables in healthy, grains in prudent, and red meat in western dietary networks were identified as hubs, indicating their important position in the identified network. High adherence to a healthy dietary network was associated with decreased odds of MDD (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.92; <i>p</i> value = 0.02), whereas, participants at the highest tertile of the western dietary network had greater odds of MDD (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.08; <i>p</i> value = 0.03). Neither prudent nor mixed networks were associated with MDD. <i>Conclusions</i>. Healthy and western dietary networks were associated with lower and higher odds of MDD, respectively. Recommendations for reducing the odds of MDD can be focused on increasing nonleafy vegetables and decreasing red meat consumption.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8749041","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dietary Networks Identified by Gaussian Graphical Model and Odds of Major Depressive Disorder: A Case-Control Study\",\"authors\":\"Hossein Shahinfar,&nbsp;Sakineh Shab-Bidar,&nbsp;Mohammad Effatpanah,&nbsp;Reza Askari,&nbsp;Shima Jazayeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/8749041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Background</i>. The Gaussian graphical model (GGM) is a new approach that has recently gained attention for identifying dietary patterns. It examines the connections between different food groups and how they are consumed together. The aim of our study was to investigate the link between dietary networks derived from GGM and the odds of major depressive disorder (MDD). <i>Methods</i>. Two hundred drug-free patients with MDD and 200 healthy individuals were enrolled in this age- and sex-matched case-control study. The mean age of the participants was 45.4 years and 67.5% were female. The Beck Depression Inventory-II questionnaire was used for screening depression in the control group. Dietary intake was assessed using a 168-item food frequency questionnaire A GGM was applied to identify dietary networks. The GGM-derived networks were scored, categorized into tertiles, and their association with MDD was determined using a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for energy intake, marital status, job status, income, living status, education, drug use, smoking status, physical activity level, family history of major depressive disorders, comorbidities, and BMI. <i>Results</i>. GGM identified four dietary networks: healthy, prudent, western, and mixed. Nonleafy vegetables in healthy, grains in prudent, and red meat in western dietary networks were identified as hubs, indicating their important position in the identified network. High adherence to a healthy dietary network was associated with decreased odds of MDD (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.92; <i>p</i> value = 0.02), whereas, participants at the highest tertile of the western dietary network had greater odds of MDD (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.08; <i>p</i> value = 0.03). Neither prudent nor mixed networks were associated with MDD. <i>Conclusions</i>. Healthy and western dietary networks were associated with lower and higher odds of MDD, respectively. Recommendations for reducing the odds of MDD can be focused on increasing nonleafy vegetables and decreasing red meat consumption.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8749041\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8749041\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8749041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。高斯图形模型(GGM)是一种新方法,最近在确定膳食模式方面受到关注。它研究了不同食物组之间的联系以及它们是如何一起消费的。我们的研究旨在调查从高斯图模型中得出的膳食网络与重度抑郁障碍(MDD)发生几率之间的联系。研究方法这项年龄和性别匹配的病例对照研究招募了 200 名未服药的重度抑郁症患者和 200 名健康人。参与者的平均年龄为 45.4 岁,67.5% 为女性。对照组采用贝克抑郁量表-II问卷进行抑郁筛查。采用 168 项食物频率问卷对饮食摄入量进行评估。采用多变量逻辑回归模型对 GGM 衍生的膳食网络进行评分,并将其分为三等分,确定其与 MDD 的关系,该模型控制了能量摄入、婚姻状况、工作状况、收入、生活状况、教育程度、药物使用、吸烟状况、体力活动水平、重度抑郁症家族史、合并症和体重指数。研究结果GGM 确定了四种膳食网络:健康型、谨慎型、西方型和混合型。健康膳食网络中的非叶菜类蔬菜、谨慎膳食网络中的谷物和西方膳食网络中的红肉被确定为枢纽,表明它们在所确定的网络中处于重要位置。对健康膳食网络的高度坚持与 MDD 发生几率的降低有关(OR:0.54,95% CI:0.31,0.92;P 值 = 0.02),而处于西方膳食网络最高层的参与者发生 MDD 的几率更高(OR:1.80,95% CI:1.05,3.08;P 值 = 0.03)。谨慎饮食网络和混合饮食网络均与 MDD 无关。结论健康饮食网络和西方饮食网络分别与较低和较高的 MDD 发生几率有关。降低多发性硬化症几率的建议可侧重于增加非叶菜类蔬菜的摄入量和减少红肉的摄入量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dietary Networks Identified by Gaussian Graphical Model and Odds of Major Depressive Disorder: A Case-Control Study

Background. The Gaussian graphical model (GGM) is a new approach that has recently gained attention for identifying dietary patterns. It examines the connections between different food groups and how they are consumed together. The aim of our study was to investigate the link between dietary networks derived from GGM and the odds of major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods. Two hundred drug-free patients with MDD and 200 healthy individuals were enrolled in this age- and sex-matched case-control study. The mean age of the participants was 45.4 years and 67.5% were female. The Beck Depression Inventory-II questionnaire was used for screening depression in the control group. Dietary intake was assessed using a 168-item food frequency questionnaire A GGM was applied to identify dietary networks. The GGM-derived networks were scored, categorized into tertiles, and their association with MDD was determined using a multivariable logistic regression model controlling for energy intake, marital status, job status, income, living status, education, drug use, smoking status, physical activity level, family history of major depressive disorders, comorbidities, and BMI. Results. GGM identified four dietary networks: healthy, prudent, western, and mixed. Nonleafy vegetables in healthy, grains in prudent, and red meat in western dietary networks were identified as hubs, indicating their important position in the identified network. High adherence to a healthy dietary network was associated with decreased odds of MDD (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.92; p value = 0.02), whereas, participants at the highest tertile of the western dietary network had greater odds of MDD (OR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.05, 3.08; p value = 0.03). Neither prudent nor mixed networks were associated with MDD. Conclusions. Healthy and western dietary networks were associated with lower and higher odds of MDD, respectively. Recommendations for reducing the odds of MDD can be focused on increasing nonleafy vegetables and decreasing red meat consumption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
High Prevalence of Unrecorded Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease in Australia, Brazil, Canada, England, and Spain: The Multinational, Observational REVEAL-CKD Study Influencing Factors for Depression and Depression Aggravation in Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Blood Urea Nitrogen to Albumin Ratio Was Associated With Mortality in Critically Ill Septic Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity–Adjusted Analysis Affordability of Original and Generic Antihypertensive Drugs Under the National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy and Basic Medical Insurance System: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Xi’an, China Guidelines for Returning to Dance Following Concussion: Adaptations From Sport Concussion Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1