S. S. Marques da Silva, L. Faizullah, M. S. Guignard, N. Orcen, A. V. Ruban, P. J. Rudall, M. Trimmer, R. A. Nichols, I. J. Leitch, A. R. Leitch
{"title":"类似雷德菲尔德的 21 氮:1 磷比例下氮和磷的相互作用对小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)生长和种子产量的影响","authors":"S. S. Marques da Silva, L. Faizullah, M. S. Guignard, N. Orcen, A. V. Ruban, P. J. Rudall, M. Trimmer, R. A. Nichols, I. J. Leitch, A. R. Leitch","doi":"10.1002/fes3.564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Efficient use of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) is essential to reduce fertilizer costs and nutrient pollution and to lower the carbon footprint of agriculture. This requires a better understanding of N and P limitations on photosynthesis and biomass generation in one of the world's most important crops, wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>). In a fully factorial nutrient experiment, we find that the limiting nutrient, N or P, at a Redfield-like N:P ratio (21N:1P molar) produces the ‘effective dose of fertilizer’ for the generation of above-ground biomass (seed or vegetative). Best-fit structural equation models showed that neither N nor P applied in excess of 21N:1P led to any increase in biomass. The light (qP, NPQ) and dark (<i>A</i><sub>max</sub>, <i>V</i><sub>cmax</sub>, <i>J</i><sub>max</sub>) reactions of photosynthesis are also constrained by the limiting nutrient at the 21N:1P Redfield-like ratio. Beyond this ratio, ‘excess N’ or ‘excess P’ had no effects. The direct effects of the ‘effective dose of fertilizer’ on the accumulation of biomass were stronger than its indirect effects via photosynthesis, likely driven by the N and P costs in building nucleic acids needed for cell division, cell maintenance and RNA transcription. Modern composite fertilizers are typically provided at a much higher P content than a 21N:1P ratio, potentially resulting in a huge global wastage of P, a finite resource, with all the concomitant costs to the farmer, consumer and the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"13 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.564","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nitrogen and phosphorus interactions at a 21 nitrogen:1 phosphorus Redfield-like ratio impact growth and seed yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)\",\"authors\":\"S. S. Marques da Silva, L. Faizullah, M. S. Guignard, N. Orcen, A. V. Ruban, P. J. Rudall, M. Trimmer, R. A. Nichols, I. J. Leitch, A. R. Leitch\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fes3.564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Efficient use of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) is essential to reduce fertilizer costs and nutrient pollution and to lower the carbon footprint of agriculture. This requires a better understanding of N and P limitations on photosynthesis and biomass generation in one of the world's most important crops, wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>). In a fully factorial nutrient experiment, we find that the limiting nutrient, N or P, at a Redfield-like N:P ratio (21N:1P molar) produces the ‘effective dose of fertilizer’ for the generation of above-ground biomass (seed or vegetative). Best-fit structural equation models showed that neither N nor P applied in excess of 21N:1P led to any increase in biomass. The light (qP, NPQ) and dark (<i>A</i><sub>max</sub>, <i>V</i><sub>cmax</sub>, <i>J</i><sub>max</sub>) reactions of photosynthesis are also constrained by the limiting nutrient at the 21N:1P Redfield-like ratio. Beyond this ratio, ‘excess N’ or ‘excess P’ had no effects. The direct effects of the ‘effective dose of fertilizer’ on the accumulation of biomass were stronger than its indirect effects via photosynthesis, likely driven by the N and P costs in building nucleic acids needed for cell division, cell maintenance and RNA transcription. Modern composite fertilizers are typically provided at a much higher P content than a 21N:1P ratio, potentially resulting in a huge global wastage of P, a finite resource, with all the concomitant costs to the farmer, consumer and the environment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Energy Security\",\"volume\":\"13 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.564\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Energy Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
高效利用氮(N)和磷(P)对于降低化肥成本和养分污染以及减少农业碳足迹至关重要。这就需要更好地了解氮和磷对世界上最重要的作物之一--小麦(Triticum aestivum)的光合作用和生物量生成的限制。在一项全因子养分实验中,我们发现限制性养分,氮或磷,在类似雷德菲尔德的氮:磷比例(21N:1P 摩尔)下,能产生 "有效剂量的肥料",以产生地上生物量(种子或植株)。最佳拟合结构方程模型显示,氮和磷的施用量超过 21N:1P 都不会导致生物量的增加。光合作用的光反应(qP、NPQ)和暗反应(Amax、Vcmax、Jmax)也受限于 21N:1P 雷德菲尔德类比的限制性养分。超过这个比例,"过量 N "或 "过量 P "就没有影响了。肥料有效剂量 "对生物量积累的直接影响强于其通过光合作用产生的间接影响,这可能是由于氮和磷在构建细胞分裂、细胞维持和 RNA 转录所需的核酸时所付出的代价。现代复合肥的磷含量通常比 21N:1P 的比例高得多,这可能会造成全球范围内磷这种有限资源的大量浪费,并给农民、消费者和环境带来相应的成本。
Nitrogen and phosphorus interactions at a 21 nitrogen:1 phosphorus Redfield-like ratio impact growth and seed yield in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)
Efficient use of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) is essential to reduce fertilizer costs and nutrient pollution and to lower the carbon footprint of agriculture. This requires a better understanding of N and P limitations on photosynthesis and biomass generation in one of the world's most important crops, wheat (Triticum aestivum). In a fully factorial nutrient experiment, we find that the limiting nutrient, N or P, at a Redfield-like N:P ratio (21N:1P molar) produces the ‘effective dose of fertilizer’ for the generation of above-ground biomass (seed or vegetative). Best-fit structural equation models showed that neither N nor P applied in excess of 21N:1P led to any increase in biomass. The light (qP, NPQ) and dark (Amax, Vcmax, Jmax) reactions of photosynthesis are also constrained by the limiting nutrient at the 21N:1P Redfield-like ratio. Beyond this ratio, ‘excess N’ or ‘excess P’ had no effects. The direct effects of the ‘effective dose of fertilizer’ on the accumulation of biomass were stronger than its indirect effects via photosynthesis, likely driven by the N and P costs in building nucleic acids needed for cell division, cell maintenance and RNA transcription. Modern composite fertilizers are typically provided at a much higher P content than a 21N:1P ratio, potentially resulting in a huge global wastage of P, a finite resource, with all the concomitant costs to the farmer, consumer and the environment.
期刊介绍:
Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor.
Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights.
Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge.
Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include:
• Agronomy
• Biotechnological Approaches
• Breeding & Genetics
• Climate Change
• Quality and Composition
• Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks
• Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry
• Functional Genomics
• Molecular Biology
• Pest and Disease Management
• Post Harvest Biology
• Soil Science
• Systems Biology