当机器人受到故意伤害时,既会被拟人化,也会被非人化

Marieke S. Wieringa, Barbara C. N. Müller, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Tibor Bosse
{"title":"当机器人受到故意伤害时,既会被拟人化,也会被非人化","authors":"Marieke S. Wieringa, Barbara C. N. Müller, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Tibor Bosse","doi":"10.1038/s44271-024-00116-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The harm-made mind phenomenon implies that witnessing intentional harm towards agents with ambiguous minds, such as robots, leads to augmented mind perception in these agents. We conducted two replications of previous work on this effect and extended it by testing if robots that detect and simulate emotions elicit a stronger harm-made mind effect than robots that do not. Additionally, we explored if someone is perceived as less prosocial when harming a robot compared to treating it kindly. The harm made mind-effect was replicated: participants attributed a higher capacity to experience pain to the robot when it was harmed, compared to when it was not harmed. We did not find evidence that this effect was influenced by the robot’s ability to detect and simulate emotions. There were significant but conflicting direct and indirect effects of harm on the perception of mind in the robot: while harm had a positive indirect effect on mind perception in the robot through the perceived capacity for pain, the direct effect of harm on mind perception was negative. This suggests that robots are both anthropomorphized and dehumanized when harmed intentionally. Additionally, the results showed that someone is perceived as less prosocial when harming a robot compared to treating it kindly. A replication of the harm-made mind effect finds conflicting effects of harm on the perception of mind in robots —robots were both anthropomorphized and dehumanized when harmed intentionally while the harmer was perceived as less prosocial.","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00116-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robots are both anthropomorphized and dehumanized when harmed intentionally\",\"authors\":\"Marieke S. Wieringa, Barbara C. N. Müller, Gijsbert Bijlstra, Tibor Bosse\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s44271-024-00116-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The harm-made mind phenomenon implies that witnessing intentional harm towards agents with ambiguous minds, such as robots, leads to augmented mind perception in these agents. We conducted two replications of previous work on this effect and extended it by testing if robots that detect and simulate emotions elicit a stronger harm-made mind effect than robots that do not. Additionally, we explored if someone is perceived as less prosocial when harming a robot compared to treating it kindly. The harm made mind-effect was replicated: participants attributed a higher capacity to experience pain to the robot when it was harmed, compared to when it was not harmed. We did not find evidence that this effect was influenced by the robot’s ability to detect and simulate emotions. There were significant but conflicting direct and indirect effects of harm on the perception of mind in the robot: while harm had a positive indirect effect on mind perception in the robot through the perceived capacity for pain, the direct effect of harm on mind perception was negative. This suggests that robots are both anthropomorphized and dehumanized when harmed intentionally. Additionally, the results showed that someone is perceived as less prosocial when harming a robot compared to treating it kindly. A replication of the harm-made mind effect finds conflicting effects of harm on the perception of mind in robots —robots were both anthropomorphized and dehumanized when harmed intentionally while the harmer was perceived as less prosocial.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communications Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00116-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communications Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00116-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00116-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伤害心理现象意味着,目睹对具有模糊心理的代理(如机器人)的故意伤害会导致这些代理的心理感知增强。我们对以前关于这种效应的研究进行了两次复制,并通过测试检测和模拟情感的机器人是否会比不检测和模拟情感的机器人引发更强烈的伤害心理效应来扩展这种效应。此外,我们还探讨了与善待机器人相比,伤害机器人的人是否会被认为不那么亲社会。伤害心理效应得到了验证:与未受到伤害时相比,当机器人受到伤害时,参与者会认为它有更强的疼痛体验能力。我们没有发现证据表明这种效应受到机器人检测和模拟情绪能力的影响。伤害对机器人心灵感知的直接和间接影响都很明显,但却相互矛盾:伤害通过对疼痛的感知能力对机器人的心灵感知产生了积极的间接影响,但伤害对心灵感知的直接影响却是消极的。这表明,当机器人受到有意伤害时,既会被拟人化,也会被非人性化。此外,研究结果表明,与善待机器人相比,伤害机器人的人被认为更不亲近社会。对 "伤害造就心灵效应 "的复制发现,伤害对机器人心灵感知的影响是相互矛盾的--机器人在受到故意伤害时既会被拟人化,也会被非人性化,而伤害者则被视为较不亲近社会的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robots are both anthropomorphized and dehumanized when harmed intentionally
The harm-made mind phenomenon implies that witnessing intentional harm towards agents with ambiguous minds, such as robots, leads to augmented mind perception in these agents. We conducted two replications of previous work on this effect and extended it by testing if robots that detect and simulate emotions elicit a stronger harm-made mind effect than robots that do not. Additionally, we explored if someone is perceived as less prosocial when harming a robot compared to treating it kindly. The harm made mind-effect was replicated: participants attributed a higher capacity to experience pain to the robot when it was harmed, compared to when it was not harmed. We did not find evidence that this effect was influenced by the robot’s ability to detect and simulate emotions. There were significant but conflicting direct and indirect effects of harm on the perception of mind in the robot: while harm had a positive indirect effect on mind perception in the robot through the perceived capacity for pain, the direct effect of harm on mind perception was negative. This suggests that robots are both anthropomorphized and dehumanized when harmed intentionally. Additionally, the results showed that someone is perceived as less prosocial when harming a robot compared to treating it kindly. A replication of the harm-made mind effect finds conflicting effects of harm on the perception of mind in robots —robots were both anthropomorphized and dehumanized when harmed intentionally while the harmer was perceived as less prosocial.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parent-child relationship quality predicts higher subjective well-being in adulthood across a diverse group of countries Sensory stimulation enhances visual working memory capacity Psychoacoustic and Archeoacoustic nature of ancient Aztec skull whistles Three diverse motives for information sharing Cultural contexts differentially shape parents’ loneliness and wellbeing during the empty nest period
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1