无二甲苯巴氏染色法

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PATHOLOGY Acta Cytologica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1159/000540862
Suhas Dhende, Saleem Pathuthara, Maya Uke, Kedar Deodhar
{"title":"无二甲苯巴氏染色法","authors":"Suhas Dhende, Saleem Pathuthara, Maya Uke, Kedar Deodhar","doi":"10.1159/000540862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Xylene (XL) is the most commonly used clearing agent in Papanicolaou staining. XL is hazardous and toxic chemical and prolonged exposure to XL can cause many ill-health effects. The health risk due to XL can be minimized by substituting XL with less hazardous clearing reagents such as Pine Oil (PO), Eucalyptus oil (EO), or Limonene (LM). The objective of this study was to compare the clearing ability, staining quality, preservation of morphology, physical properties, and cost of XL, PO, EO, and LM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four smears were prepared from each of 50 serous effusions and were subjected to Papanicolaou stain. Out of four smears, one each was exposed to clearing specifically with XL (control), PO (test), EO (test), and LM (test). Test smears were compared with control for clearing, staining and morphology; graded as excellent, good or fair and further scored as 3, 2, 1, and the quality index (QI) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed and the p value was calculated. In addition, the physical properties and cost of all the reagents were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QI was 0.96 for both XL and PO, whereas 0.92 and 0.54 for EO and LM, respectively. Compared to XL, the quality of staining, clearing and morphology of PO and EO were statistically not significant, whereas the difference was statistically significant with LM (p = 0.005). Physical properties such as volatility, flammability, miscibility with alcohol and DPX and the refractive indices of all the reagents were almost similar and all were recyclable. Odor was pungent for XL and EO but was pleasant for PO and LM. The cost was less for PO as compared to others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PO was a natural, less hazardous, less toxic, and economical clearing agent and can be considered as a substitute for XL.</p>","PeriodicalId":6959,"journal":{"name":"Acta Cytologica","volume":" ","pages":"472-480"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Xylene-Free Papanicolaou Staining.\",\"authors\":\"Suhas Dhende, Saleem Pathuthara, Maya Uke, Kedar Deodhar\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Xylene (XL) is the most commonly used clearing agent in Papanicolaou staining. XL is hazardous and toxic chemical and prolonged exposure to XL can cause many ill-health effects. The health risk due to XL can be minimized by substituting XL with less hazardous clearing reagents such as Pine Oil (PO), Eucalyptus oil (EO), or Limonene (LM). The objective of this study was to compare the clearing ability, staining quality, preservation of morphology, physical properties, and cost of XL, PO, EO, and LM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four smears were prepared from each of 50 serous effusions and were subjected to Papanicolaou stain. Out of four smears, one each was exposed to clearing specifically with XL (control), PO (test), EO (test), and LM (test). Test smears were compared with control for clearing, staining and morphology; graded as excellent, good or fair and further scored as 3, 2, 1, and the quality index (QI) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed and the p value was calculated. In addition, the physical properties and cost of all the reagents were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>QI was 0.96 for both XL and PO, whereas 0.92 and 0.54 for EO and LM, respectively. Compared to XL, the quality of staining, clearing and morphology of PO and EO were statistically not significant, whereas the difference was statistically significant with LM (p = 0.005). Physical properties such as volatility, flammability, miscibility with alcohol and DPX and the refractive indices of all the reagents were almost similar and all were recyclable. Odor was pungent for XL and EO but was pleasant for PO and LM. The cost was less for PO as compared to others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PO was a natural, less hazardous, less toxic, and economical clearing agent and can be considered as a substitute for XL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Cytologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"472-480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Cytologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540862\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Cytologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介二甲苯(XL)是巴氏染色法中最常用的染色剂。二甲苯是一种有害的有毒化学物质,长期接触二甲苯会对健康造成许多不良影响。用松油 (PO)、桉叶油 (EO) 或柠檬烯 (LM) 等危害较小的清除试剂代替 XL,可将 XL 对健康的危害降至最低。本研究旨在比较 XL、PO、EO 和 LM 的清除能力、染色质量、形态保存、物理性质和成本:方法:从 50 份血清渗出液中各取 4 份涂片,进行巴氏染色。在四张涂片中,各用 XL(对照组)、PO(试验组)、EO(试验组)和 LM(试验组)进行专门的清液处理。将试验涂片与对照组的清液、染色和形态进行比较,分为优、良、中三个等级,并进一步分为 3、2、1 三个等级,计算出质量指数(QI)。进行统计分析并计算 p 值。此外,还对所有试剂的物理性质和成本进行了比较:XL 和 PO 的质量指数均为 0.96,而 EO & LM 分别为 0.92 和 0.54。与 XL 相比,PO 和 EO 的染色质量、清晰度和形态无显著统计学差异,而 LM 的差异有显著统计学意义(p=0.005)。所有试剂的物理性质,如挥发性、易燃性、与酒精和 DPX 的混溶性以及折光指数几乎相似,且均可回收利用。XL 和环氧乙烷的气味刺鼻,而 PO 和 LM 的气味宜人。与其他试剂相比,PO 的成本较低:结论:PO 是一种天然、低危害、低毒性和经济的清除剂,可视为 XL 的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Xylene-Free Papanicolaou Staining.

Introduction: Xylene (XL) is the most commonly used clearing agent in Papanicolaou staining. XL is hazardous and toxic chemical and prolonged exposure to XL can cause many ill-health effects. The health risk due to XL can be minimized by substituting XL with less hazardous clearing reagents such as Pine Oil (PO), Eucalyptus oil (EO), or Limonene (LM). The objective of this study was to compare the clearing ability, staining quality, preservation of morphology, physical properties, and cost of XL, PO, EO, and LM.

Methods: Four smears were prepared from each of 50 serous effusions and were subjected to Papanicolaou stain. Out of four smears, one each was exposed to clearing specifically with XL (control), PO (test), EO (test), and LM (test). Test smears were compared with control for clearing, staining and morphology; graded as excellent, good or fair and further scored as 3, 2, 1, and the quality index (QI) was calculated. Statistical analysis was performed and the p value was calculated. In addition, the physical properties and cost of all the reagents were compared.

Results: QI was 0.96 for both XL and PO, whereas 0.92 and 0.54 for EO and LM, respectively. Compared to XL, the quality of staining, clearing and morphology of PO and EO were statistically not significant, whereas the difference was statistically significant with LM (p = 0.005). Physical properties such as volatility, flammability, miscibility with alcohol and DPX and the refractive indices of all the reagents were almost similar and all were recyclable. Odor was pungent for XL and EO but was pleasant for PO and LM. The cost was less for PO as compared to others.

Conclusion: PO was a natural, less hazardous, less toxic, and economical clearing agent and can be considered as a substitute for XL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Cytologica
Acta Cytologica 生物-病理学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: With articles offering an excellent balance between clinical cytology and cytopathology, ''Acta Cytologica'' fosters the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms behind cytomorphology and thus facilitates the translation of frontline research into clinical practice. As the official journal of the International Academy of Cytology and affiliated to over 50 national cytology societies around the world, ''Acta Cytologica'' evaluates new and existing diagnostic applications of scientific advances as well as their clinical correlations. Original papers, review articles, meta-analyses, novel insights from clinical practice, and letters to the editor cover topics from diagnostic cytopathology, gynecologic and non-gynecologic cytopathology to fine needle aspiration, molecular techniques and their diagnostic applications. As the perfect reference for practical use, ''Acta Cytologica'' addresses a multidisciplinary audience practicing clinical cytopathology, cell biology, oncology, interventional radiology, otorhinolaryngology, gastroenterology, urology, pulmonology and preventive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Ongoing challenges in maintaining the diagnostic quality of cervical cytopathology. Is it possible to minimize differences in morphological interpretations? Message from the International Academy of Cytology. Message from the International Academy of Cytology. Reclassification of Urinary Cytology according to the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology Correlation with Histological Diagnosis. Cytopathology of a Newly Described Salivary Gland Neoplasm: A Case Report of Microsecretory Adenocarcinoma Presenting in the Parotid Gland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1