Kylie R Swiekatowski, Jose E Barrera, David Hopkins, Arvind D Manisundaram, Mohin A Bhadkamkar, Yuewei Wu-Fienberg
{"title":"风险分析指数虚弱评分作为下肢重建手术不良结果预测指标的有效性。","authors":"Kylie R Swiekatowski, Jose E Barrera, David Hopkins, Arvind D Manisundaram, Mohin A Bhadkamkar, Yuewei Wu-Fienberg","doi":"10.1055/a-2383-6916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The rising clinical importance of assessing frailty is driven by its predictive capability for postoperative outcomes. This study assesses the effectiveness of RAI-rev (Revised Risk Analysis Index) in predicting adverse outcomes in lower extremity (LE) flap reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Analyzing NSQIP (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) data from 2015 to 2020, we compared demographics, perioperative factors, and 30-day outcomes in all locoregional and free-flap cases. Frailty scores, calculated using RAI-rev, were categorized with <15 as nonfrail and >35 as the most frail. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specific complications were calculated using nonfrail as the reference group. Frailty scores in locoregional flaps were compared with those in free flaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We identified 270 locoregional and 107 free-flap cases. Higher RAI-rev scores in locoregional flaps correlated with increased complications, such as deep surgical site infection (1% nonfrail vs. 20% RAI 31-35), stroke (0% nonfrail vs. 17% most frail), and mortality (0% nonfrail vs. 17% most frail). Locoregional flap cases with RAI-rev scores in the most frail group had a significantly elevated aOR for stroke (51.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-1402.5, <i>p</i> = 0.02), mortality (43.1, 95% CI: 1.6-1167.6, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and any complication (6.8, 95% CI: 1.2-37.4, <i>p</i> = 0.03). In free-flap cases, higher RAI-rev scores were associated with increased complications, with only sepsis showing a statistically significant difference (6% nonfrail vs. 100% most frail; aOR: 42.3, CI: 1.45-1245.3, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Free-flap cases had a significantly lower RAI-rev score compared with locoregional flap cases (14.91 vs. 17.64, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Elevated RAI-rev scores (>35) correlated with more complications in locoregional flaps, while free-flap reconstruction patients had generally low RAI-rev scores. This suggests that free flaps are less commonly recommended for presumed higher risk patients. The study demonstrates that RAI-rev may be able to serve as a risk calculator in LE reconstruction, aiding in the assessment of candidates for limb salvage versus amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Risk Analysis Index Frailty Scores as a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Lower Extremity Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Kylie R Swiekatowski, Jose E Barrera, David Hopkins, Arvind D Manisundaram, Mohin A Bhadkamkar, Yuewei Wu-Fienberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2383-6916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The rising clinical importance of assessing frailty is driven by its predictive capability for postoperative outcomes. This study assesses the effectiveness of RAI-rev (Revised Risk Analysis Index) in predicting adverse outcomes in lower extremity (LE) flap reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Analyzing NSQIP (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) data from 2015 to 2020, we compared demographics, perioperative factors, and 30-day outcomes in all locoregional and free-flap cases. Frailty scores, calculated using RAI-rev, were categorized with <15 as nonfrail and >35 as the most frail. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specific complications were calculated using nonfrail as the reference group. Frailty scores in locoregional flaps were compared with those in free flaps.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We identified 270 locoregional and 107 free-flap cases. Higher RAI-rev scores in locoregional flaps correlated with increased complications, such as deep surgical site infection (1% nonfrail vs. 20% RAI 31-35), stroke (0% nonfrail vs. 17% most frail), and mortality (0% nonfrail vs. 17% most frail). Locoregional flap cases with RAI-rev scores in the most frail group had a significantly elevated aOR for stroke (51.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-1402.5, <i>p</i> = 0.02), mortality (43.1, 95% CI: 1.6-1167.6, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and any complication (6.8, 95% CI: 1.2-37.4, <i>p</i> = 0.03). In free-flap cases, higher RAI-rev scores were associated with increased complications, with only sepsis showing a statistically significant difference (6% nonfrail vs. 100% most frail; aOR: 42.3, CI: 1.45-1245.3, <i>p</i> = 0.03). Free-flap cases had a significantly lower RAI-rev score compared with locoregional flap cases (14.91 vs. 17.64, <i>p</i> = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Elevated RAI-rev scores (>35) correlated with more complications in locoregional flaps, while free-flap reconstruction patients had generally low RAI-rev scores. This suggests that free flaps are less commonly recommended for presumed higher risk patients. The study demonstrates that RAI-rev may be able to serve as a risk calculator in LE reconstruction, aiding in the assessment of candidates for limb salvage versus amputation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2383-6916\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2383-6916","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:评估虚弱程度的临床重要性因其对术后结果的预测能力而不断提高。本研究评估了 RAI-rev(风险分析指数)在预测下肢(LE)皮瓣重建不良后果方面的有效性:通过分析 2015-2020 年的 NSQIP 数据,我们比较了所有局部皮瓣和游离皮瓣病例的人口统计学、围术期因素和 30 天预后。采用 RAI-rev 计算出的虚弱评分以 35 分为最虚弱。以非体弱者为参照组,计算特定并发症的调整赔率(aOR)。将局部皮瓣与游离皮瓣的虚弱评分进行了比较:我们确定了 270 例局部皮瓣和 107 例游离皮瓣病例。局部皮瓣的 RAI-rev 评分越高,并发症越多,如深部手术部位感染(1% 非体弱者 vs. 20% RAI 31-35)、中风(0% 非体弱者 vs. 17% 最体弱者)和死亡率(0% 非体弱者 vs. 17% 最体弱者)。RAI-rev评分为最虚弱组的局部皮瓣病例的中风(51.0,95% CI:1.8-1402.5,p=0.02)、死亡率(43.1,95% CI:1.6-1167.6,p=0.03)和任何并发症(6.8,95% CI:1.2-37.4,p=0.03)的aOR显著升高。在游离皮瓣病例中,RAI-rev评分越高,并发症越多,只有败血症显示出统计学上的显著差异(6% 非最弱 vs. 100% 最弱;aOR 42.3,CI:1.45 - 1245.3,p=0.03)。与局部皮瓣病例相比,游离皮瓣病例的RAI-rev评分明显较低(14.91 vs. 17.64,P=0.01):结论:RAI-rev评分升高(>35)与局部皮瓣并发症增多有关,而游离皮瓣重建患者的RAI-rev评分普遍较低。这表明游离皮瓣较少被推荐用于假定风险较高的患者。该研究表明,RAI-rev 可以作为下肢重建的风险计算器,帮助评估肢体挽救与截肢的候选者。
Effectiveness of Risk Analysis Index Frailty Scores as a Predictor of Adverse Outcomes in Lower Extremity Reconstruction.
Background: The rising clinical importance of assessing frailty is driven by its predictive capability for postoperative outcomes. This study assesses the effectiveness of RAI-rev (Revised Risk Analysis Index) in predicting adverse outcomes in lower extremity (LE) flap reconstruction.
Methods: Analyzing NSQIP (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) data from 2015 to 2020, we compared demographics, perioperative factors, and 30-day outcomes in all locoregional and free-flap cases. Frailty scores, calculated using RAI-rev, were categorized with <15 as nonfrail and >35 as the most frail. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for specific complications were calculated using nonfrail as the reference group. Frailty scores in locoregional flaps were compared with those in free flaps.
Results: We identified 270 locoregional and 107 free-flap cases. Higher RAI-rev scores in locoregional flaps correlated with increased complications, such as deep surgical site infection (1% nonfrail vs. 20% RAI 31-35), stroke (0% nonfrail vs. 17% most frail), and mortality (0% nonfrail vs. 17% most frail). Locoregional flap cases with RAI-rev scores in the most frail group had a significantly elevated aOR for stroke (51.0, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-1402.5, p = 0.02), mortality (43.1, 95% CI: 1.6-1167.6, p = 0.03), and any complication (6.8, 95% CI: 1.2-37.4, p = 0.03). In free-flap cases, higher RAI-rev scores were associated with increased complications, with only sepsis showing a statistically significant difference (6% nonfrail vs. 100% most frail; aOR: 42.3, CI: 1.45-1245.3, p = 0.03). Free-flap cases had a significantly lower RAI-rev score compared with locoregional flap cases (14.91 vs. 17.64, p = 0.01).
Conclusion: Elevated RAI-rev scores (>35) correlated with more complications in locoregional flaps, while free-flap reconstruction patients had generally low RAI-rev scores. This suggests that free flaps are less commonly recommended for presumed higher risk patients. The study demonstrates that RAI-rev may be able to serve as a risk calculator in LE reconstruction, aiding in the assessment of candidates for limb salvage versus amputation.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers.
The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases.
The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.