原发性前列腺腺癌选择性前列腺动脉灌注与静脉 PSMA PET/CT 放射性配体灌注的药代动力学比较

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.232544
Ryan Kohlbrenner, Xiao Wu, Hao G Nguyen, Matthew R Cooperberg, Tushar Chakravarty, Peter R Carroll, Thomas A Hope
{"title":"原发性前列腺腺癌选择性前列腺动脉灌注与静脉 PSMA PET/CT 放射性配体灌注的药代动力学比较","authors":"Ryan Kohlbrenner, Xiao Wu, Hao G Nguyen, Matthew R Cooperberg, Tushar Chakravarty, Peter R Carroll, Thomas A Hope","doi":"10.1148/radiol.232544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Intravenous prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy improves survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Yet, the impact of selective prostatic arterial administration on primary tumor uptake is unclear. Purpose To compare gallium 68 (<sup>68</sup>Ga)-PSMA-11 uptake using dynamic PET/CT in prostatic tumoral volumes of interest (VOIs) during intravenous and selective prostatic arterial infusions for individuals with untreated, high-risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this prospective, intraindividual comparative study conducted at an academic medical center, five men aged 58, 61, 64, 66, and 68 years with treatment-naive prostate cancer were enrolled between January 2022 and February 2023 and underwent two dynamic <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT examinations 1 week apart. During the first examination, the radiotracer was administered intravenously. During the second administration, the radiotracer was delivered into either the right or left prostatic artery through an angiographically placed microcatheter. The primary outcome was maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) in prostatic tumoral VOIs. The secondary outcomes included mean SUV (SUV<sub>mean</sub>) in prostatic tumoral VOIs and area under the SUV<sub>mean</sub> curves (AUC). Longitudinal mixed-effects models were used to compare dynamic SUV<sub>max</sub> and SUV<sub>mean</sub> time-activity curves (TACs), and paired <i>t</i> tests were used for the remaining data. Results The mean SUV<sub>max</sub> within tumoral VOIs was 14 (range, 3-43) for venous sessions and 938 (range, 460-1436) for arterial sessions (<i>P</i> = .008). The SUV<sub>mean</sub> within VOIs was greater during arterial sessions (<i>P</i> < .001) overall and 46-fold and 19-fold greater at peak uptake and final time points, respectively. The mean AUC was greater on arterial TACs than on venous TACs at 14600 SUV × min (range, 8353-20025 SUV × min) and 240 SUV × min (range, 69-622 SUV × min), respectively (<i>P</i> = .002). Conclusion Selective prostatic arterial infusion resulted in greater <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 tumoral SUV than intravenous infusion. Further study of local-regional, intra-arterial delivery of a PSMA-targeted theranostic agent is warranted in high-risk prostate cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04976257 © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Civelek in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366670/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Selective Prostatic Arterial and Intravenous PSMA PET/CT Radioligand Infusions in Primary Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Kohlbrenner, Xiao Wu, Hao G Nguyen, Matthew R Cooperberg, Tushar Chakravarty, Peter R Carroll, Thomas A Hope\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/radiol.232544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background Intravenous prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy improves survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Yet, the impact of selective prostatic arterial administration on primary tumor uptake is unclear. Purpose To compare gallium 68 (<sup>68</sup>Ga)-PSMA-11 uptake using dynamic PET/CT in prostatic tumoral volumes of interest (VOIs) during intravenous and selective prostatic arterial infusions for individuals with untreated, high-risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this prospective, intraindividual comparative study conducted at an academic medical center, five men aged 58, 61, 64, 66, and 68 years with treatment-naive prostate cancer were enrolled between January 2022 and February 2023 and underwent two dynamic <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT examinations 1 week apart. During the first examination, the radiotracer was administered intravenously. During the second administration, the radiotracer was delivered into either the right or left prostatic artery through an angiographically placed microcatheter. The primary outcome was maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) in prostatic tumoral VOIs. The secondary outcomes included mean SUV (SUV<sub>mean</sub>) in prostatic tumoral VOIs and area under the SUV<sub>mean</sub> curves (AUC). Longitudinal mixed-effects models were used to compare dynamic SUV<sub>max</sub> and SUV<sub>mean</sub> time-activity curves (TACs), and paired <i>t</i> tests were used for the remaining data. Results The mean SUV<sub>max</sub> within tumoral VOIs was 14 (range, 3-43) for venous sessions and 938 (range, 460-1436) for arterial sessions (<i>P</i> = .008). The SUV<sub>mean</sub> within VOIs was greater during arterial sessions (<i>P</i> < .001) overall and 46-fold and 19-fold greater at peak uptake and final time points, respectively. The mean AUC was greater on arterial TACs than on venous TACs at 14600 SUV × min (range, 8353-20025 SUV × min) and 240 SUV × min (range, 69-622 SUV × min), respectively (<i>P</i> = .002). Conclusion Selective prostatic arterial infusion resulted in greater <sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA-11 tumoral SUV than intravenous infusion. Further study of local-regional, intra-arterial delivery of a PSMA-targeted theranostic agent is warranted in high-risk prostate cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04976257 © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Civelek in this issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366670/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.232544\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.232544","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 静脉注射前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)靶向放射性配体疗法可提高转移性阉割耐药前列腺癌男性患者的生存率。然而,选择性前列腺动脉给药对原发肿瘤摄取的影响尚不清楚。目的 比较未经治疗的高危前列腺癌患者在静脉输注和选择性前列腺动脉输注期间前列腺肿瘤感兴趣容积(VOI)中使用动态 PET/CT 对 68 (68Ga) -PSMA-11 镓的摄取情况。材料与方法 在这项前瞻性、个体内部比较研究中,一家学术医疗中心在 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 2 月期间招募了五名年龄分别为 58、61、64、66 和 68 岁的前列腺癌患者,并对他们进行了两次动态 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT 检查,每次检查间隔一周。第一次检查时,通过静脉注射放射性示踪剂。第二次给药时,通过血管造影置入的微导管将放射性示踪剂送入右侧或左侧前列腺动脉。主要结果是前列腺肿瘤VOI的最大标准化摄取值(SUVmax)。次要结果包括前列腺肿瘤VOI的平均SUV(SUVmean)和SUVmean曲线下面积(AUC)。采用纵向混合效应模型比较动态 SUVmax 和 SUVmean 时间-活动曲线(TAC),其余数据采用配对 t 检验。结果 静脉疗程的肿瘤 VOI 内平均 SUVmax 为 14(范围:3-43),动脉疗程的肿瘤 VOI 内平均 SUVmax 为 938(范围:460-1436)(P = .008)。总体而言,动脉疗程中 VOIs 内的 SUV 平均值更大(P < .001),摄取峰值和最后时间点的 SUV 平均值分别是静脉疗程的 46 倍和 19 倍。动脉 TAC 的平均 AUC 值大于静脉 TAC,分别为 14600 SUV × min(范围为 8353-20025 SUV × min)和 240 SUV × min(范围为 69-622 SUV × min)(P = .002)。结论 与静脉输注相比,选择性前列腺动脉输注可获得更大的 68Ga-PSMA-11 肿瘤 SUV。在高风险前列腺癌中,有必要对局部区域动脉内注射 PSMA 靶向治疗剂进行进一步研究。ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04976257 © RSNA, 2024 本文有补充材料。另请参阅本期 Civelek 的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacokinetic Comparison of Selective Prostatic Arterial and Intravenous PSMA PET/CT Radioligand Infusions in Primary Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.

Background Intravenous prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy improves survival in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Yet, the impact of selective prostatic arterial administration on primary tumor uptake is unclear. Purpose To compare gallium 68 (68Ga)-PSMA-11 uptake using dynamic PET/CT in prostatic tumoral volumes of interest (VOIs) during intravenous and selective prostatic arterial infusions for individuals with untreated, high-risk prostate cancer. Materials and Methods In this prospective, intraindividual comparative study conducted at an academic medical center, five men aged 58, 61, 64, 66, and 68 years with treatment-naive prostate cancer were enrolled between January 2022 and February 2023 and underwent two dynamic 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT examinations 1 week apart. During the first examination, the radiotracer was administered intravenously. During the second administration, the radiotracer was delivered into either the right or left prostatic artery through an angiographically placed microcatheter. The primary outcome was maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in prostatic tumoral VOIs. The secondary outcomes included mean SUV (SUVmean) in prostatic tumoral VOIs and area under the SUVmean curves (AUC). Longitudinal mixed-effects models were used to compare dynamic SUVmax and SUVmean time-activity curves (TACs), and paired t tests were used for the remaining data. Results The mean SUVmax within tumoral VOIs was 14 (range, 3-43) for venous sessions and 938 (range, 460-1436) for arterial sessions (P = .008). The SUVmean within VOIs was greater during arterial sessions (P < .001) overall and 46-fold and 19-fold greater at peak uptake and final time points, respectively. The mean AUC was greater on arterial TACs than on venous TACs at 14600 SUV × min (range, 8353-20025 SUV × min) and 240 SUV × min (range, 69-622 SUV × min), respectively (P = .002). Conclusion Selective prostatic arterial infusion resulted in greater 68Ga-PSMA-11 tumoral SUV than intravenous infusion. Further study of local-regional, intra-arterial delivery of a PSMA-targeted theranostic agent is warranted in high-risk prostate cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04976257 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Civelek in this issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Amplifying Research in Radiology: The Podcast Effect. Amplifying Research: The Potential for Podcasts to Boost Radiology Journal Article Exposure. Automated Interstitial Lung Abnormality Probability Prediction at CT: A Stepwise Machine Learning Approach in the Boston Lung Cancer Study. Biomarkers for Personalized Neoadjuvant Therapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Moving Forward. Calcified Osteosarcoma Lung Metastases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1