[长期护理中的药物供应和多重用药 :可能的干预措施概述和功能概念问题]。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1007/s00391-024-02340-1
Fabian Graeb, Bianca Berger, Frank Alf, Petra Reiber, Gundula Essig, Reinhold Wolke
{"title":"[长期护理中的药物供应和多重用药 :可能的干预措施概述和功能概念问题]。","authors":"Fabian Graeb, Bianca Berger, Frank Alf, Petra Reiber, Gundula Essig, Reinhold Wolke","doi":"10.1007/s00391-024-02340-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polypharmacy and the resulting problems lead to considerable consequences for those affected. There are also considerable problems with the medication management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Which interventions and programs for optimizing the supply of medication are available for nursing homes and which implementation problems can be expected?</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A literature search was carried out for interventional studies in nursing homes in Germany, with a focus on improving medication safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six programs were identified for which evaluation results are available. Despite a mostly multimodal approach with several pillars of intervention (e.g., medication reviews, further education and training, development of aids), the results are largely disappointing. The effects on the number of prescriptions in general, specific medication groups or outcome parameters such as hospital admissions could only be shown in one study, whereby, selection bias could also be at least partly responsible for this. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the implementation of medication recommendations formulated in reviews by the responsible physicians are the main problem areas. At the same time, too little attention is paid to the central role of nurses in the entire process and they are not actively promoted enough. This could be one of the reasons for the difficulties in implementation in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are nearly no significant changes as a result of the interventions implemented in the studies reviewed. In particular, interprofessional cooperation, especially the skills of nurses and the reluctance on the part of physicians, should probably be given more attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Medication supply and polypharmacy in long-term care : An overview of possible interventions and the question of a functioning concept].\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Graeb, Bianca Berger, Frank Alf, Petra Reiber, Gundula Essig, Reinhold Wolke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00391-024-02340-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polypharmacy and the resulting problems lead to considerable consequences for those affected. There are also considerable problems with the medication management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Which interventions and programs for optimizing the supply of medication are available for nursing homes and which implementation problems can be expected?</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>A literature search was carried out for interventional studies in nursing homes in Germany, with a focus on improving medication safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of six programs were identified for which evaluation results are available. Despite a mostly multimodal approach with several pillars of intervention (e.g., medication reviews, further education and training, development of aids), the results are largely disappointing. The effects on the number of prescriptions in general, specific medication groups or outcome parameters such as hospital admissions could only be shown in one study, whereby, selection bias could also be at least partly responsible for this. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the implementation of medication recommendations formulated in reviews by the responsible physicians are the main problem areas. At the same time, too little attention is paid to the central role of nurses in the entire process and they are not actively promoted enough. This could be one of the reasons for the difficulties in implementation in practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are nearly no significant changes as a result of the interventions implemented in the studies reviewed. In particular, interprofessional cooperation, especially the skills of nurses and the reluctance on the part of physicians, should probably be given more attention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49345,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-024-02340-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-024-02340-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多重用药及由此产生的问题给患者带来了严重后果。在药物管理方面也存在相当多的问题:材料与方法:对德国养老院的干预性研究进行了文献检索,重点是改善用药安全:结果:共发现了六项有评估结果的计划。尽管这些计划大多采用多模式方法,并有多个干预支柱(如用药审查、继续教育和培训、开发辅助工具),但结果大多令人失望。只有一项研究显示了对一般处方数量、特定药物组别或入院率等结果参数的影响,而选择偏差至少也是造成这种情况的部分原因。跨学科合作和负责医生执行审查中提出的用药建议是主要的问题所在。与此同时,人们对护士在整个过程中的核心作用关注太少,对她们的宣传也不够积极。这可能是在实践中难以实施的原因之一:结论:综述研究中实施的干预措施几乎没有带来重大变化。特别是跨专业合作,尤其是护士的技能和医生的不情愿,可能应得到更多关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Medication supply and polypharmacy in long-term care : An overview of possible interventions and the question of a functioning concept].

Background: Polypharmacy and the resulting problems lead to considerable consequences for those affected. There are also considerable problems with the medication management.

Objective: Which interventions and programs for optimizing the supply of medication are available for nursing homes and which implementation problems can be expected?

Material and method: A literature search was carried out for interventional studies in nursing homes in Germany, with a focus on improving medication safety.

Results: A total of six programs were identified for which evaluation results are available. Despite a mostly multimodal approach with several pillars of intervention (e.g., medication reviews, further education and training, development of aids), the results are largely disappointing. The effects on the number of prescriptions in general, specific medication groups or outcome parameters such as hospital admissions could only be shown in one study, whereby, selection bias could also be at least partly responsible for this. Interdisciplinary collaboration and the implementation of medication recommendations formulated in reviews by the responsible physicians are the main problem areas. At the same time, too little attention is paid to the central role of nurses in the entire process and they are not actively promoted enough. This could be one of the reasons for the difficulties in implementation in practice.

Conclusion: There are nearly no significant changes as a result of the interventions implemented in the studies reviewed. In particular, interprofessional cooperation, especially the skills of nurses and the reluctance on the part of physicians, should probably be given more attention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
期刊最新文献
Mitteilungen der DGG. Mitteilungen der DGGG. Mitteilungen der ÖGGG. Mitteilungen des BV Geriatrie. [Digitalization and care relationships of people living alone in old age: a critical analysis of policy documents].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1