高仿真模拟与中仿真模拟在护理学生决策中的比较研究:实验研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2024-08-12 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1518-8345.6847.4269
Hugo Miguel Santos Duarte, Joana Antunes Castanheira, Ana Sofia Ferreira Pereira, Ângela Pragosa, Edna Tatiana Prazeres Santos, Maria Dos Anjos Dixe
{"title":"高仿真模拟与中仿真模拟在护理学生决策中的比较研究:实验研究。","authors":"Hugo Miguel Santos Duarte, Joana Antunes Castanheira, Ana Sofia Ferreira Pereira, Ângela Pragosa, Edna Tatiana Prazeres Santos, Maria Dos Anjos Dixe","doi":"10.1590/1518-8345.6847.4269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare the decision-making of Nursing students, before and after theoretical training on basic life support, using the practice of high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>an experimental study was developed, pre- and post-test type, with quantitative, descriptive and inferential analysis, with theoretical training on basic life support and clinical simulation practices, and with evaluation of knowledge and decision-making of Nursing students, at three different moments - before the simulation scenario (T0), after the simulation scenario (T1) and after clinical teaching (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51 students participated in the research, with an average age of 20.25±3.804, of which 92.2% were female. Statistically significant differences (F=6.47; p=0.039) were evident regarding the definition of the problem and development of objectives in decision-making in the experimental group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nursing students demonstrate an adequate level of knowledge and a good decision-making process, based on the most current instruments produced by scientific evidence, in clinical simulation scenarios in basic life support, and this innovative methodology should be deepened in the Nursing teaching.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>(1) Clinical simulation promotes good decision-making of Nursing students.(2) Students demonstrated adequate knowledge about basic life support.(3) Knowledge and practice define the fidelity of clinical simulation.(4) Basic life support can be developed by high-fidelity simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48692,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study between high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation in decision-making of nursing students: experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Hugo Miguel Santos Duarte, Joana Antunes Castanheira, Ana Sofia Ferreira Pereira, Ângela Pragosa, Edna Tatiana Prazeres Santos, Maria Dos Anjos Dixe\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1518-8345.6847.4269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to compare the decision-making of Nursing students, before and after theoretical training on basic life support, using the practice of high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>an experimental study was developed, pre- and post-test type, with quantitative, descriptive and inferential analysis, with theoretical training on basic life support and clinical simulation practices, and with evaluation of knowledge and decision-making of Nursing students, at three different moments - before the simulation scenario (T0), after the simulation scenario (T1) and after clinical teaching (T2).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>51 students participated in the research, with an average age of 20.25±3.804, of which 92.2% were female. Statistically significant differences (F=6.47; p=0.039) were evident regarding the definition of the problem and development of objectives in decision-making in the experimental group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nursing students demonstrate an adequate level of knowledge and a good decision-making process, based on the most current instruments produced by scientific evidence, in clinical simulation scenarios in basic life support, and this innovative methodology should be deepened in the Nursing teaching.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>(1) Clinical simulation promotes good decision-making of Nursing students.(2) Students demonstrated adequate knowledge about basic life support.(3) Knowledge and practice define the fidelity of clinical simulation.(4) Basic life support can be developed by high-fidelity simulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321187/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6847.4269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latino-Americana De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.6847.4269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较护理专业学生在接受基本生命支持理论培训前后,利用高仿真模拟和中仿真模拟实践做出决策的情况。方法:开展一项实验研究,采用前测和后测式,进行定量、描述性和推理分析,进行基本生命支持理论培训和临床模拟实践,并在模拟情景前(T0)、模拟情景后(T1)和临床教学后(T2)三个不同时刻对护理专业学生的知识和决策情况进行评估:51名学生参与了研究,平均年龄(20.25±3.804)岁,其中92.2%为女生。实验组在确定问题和制定决策目标方面存在明显的统计学差异(F=6.47;P=0.039):重点:(1) 临床模拟促进护理专业学生的良好决策。(2) 学生表现出对基本生命支持的充分了解。(3) 知识和实践决定了临床模拟的保真度。(4) 基本生命支持可以通过高保真模拟来发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study between high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation in decision-making of nursing students: experimental study.

Objective: to compare the decision-making of Nursing students, before and after theoretical training on basic life support, using the practice of high-fidelity simulation and medium-fidelity simulation.

Method: an experimental study was developed, pre- and post-test type, with quantitative, descriptive and inferential analysis, with theoretical training on basic life support and clinical simulation practices, and with evaluation of knowledge and decision-making of Nursing students, at three different moments - before the simulation scenario (T0), after the simulation scenario (T1) and after clinical teaching (T2).

Results: 51 students participated in the research, with an average age of 20.25±3.804, of which 92.2% were female. Statistically significant differences (F=6.47; p=0.039) were evident regarding the definition of the problem and development of objectives in decision-making in the experimental group.

Conclusion: Nursing students demonstrate an adequate level of knowledge and a good decision-making process, based on the most current instruments produced by scientific evidence, in clinical simulation scenarios in basic life support, and this innovative methodology should be deepened in the Nursing teaching.

Highlights: (1) Clinical simulation promotes good decision-making of Nursing students.(2) Students demonstrated adequate knowledge about basic life support.(3) Knowledge and practice define the fidelity of clinical simulation.(4) Basic life support can be developed by high-fidelity simulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: A Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem constitui-se no órgão oficial de divulgação científica da Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto da Universidade de São Paulo e do Centro Colaborador da OMS para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Enfermagem. Foi criada em abril de 1992 sendo sua primeira edição publicada em janeiro de 1993. No período de 1993 a 1997 tinha periodicidade semestral, de 1997 a 2000 trimestral e, a partir de janeiro de 2001, tem periodicidade bimestral. Caracteriza-se como periódico de circulação internacional, abrangendo predominantemente os países da América Latina e Caribe, embora seja também divulgado para assinantes dos Estados Unidos, Portugal e Espanha.
期刊最新文献
Promoting mental health in the workplace: web software development and validation. Aerospace nurses' competencies in disaster situations: a scoping review. Complications in the use of peripherally inserted central catheter associated with peripheral intravenous therapy: retrospective cohort. Enhancing early bonding between mothers and preterm infants: findings from a Multicentre Qualitative Study of Nurses. Epidemic curves and the profile of patients hospitalized by COVID-19 in a border region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1