{"title":"阿尔茨海默病风险降低健康辅导:比较分析。","authors":"Faika Zanjani, Brian Battle, Joann Richardson","doi":"10.1093/geront/gnae106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recent guidelines point to lifestyle as a tool for decreasing Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. To address the limited practice and availability of AD risk reduction interventions, this study aimed to explore the feasibility of a community-level lifestyle intervention targeting high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Diverse older adults (60+) living in the Richmond, VA, local area, with the following risk factors, incomes below $12,000/year and managing diabetes or cardiovascular disease, were offered weekly lifestyle telephone health coaching for 12 weeks in 2019-2020 (intervention group). The health coaching sessions provided Alzheimer's disease (AD) lifestyle risk reduction education and goal setting/planning. The intervention sample (n = 40, mean age 68 years (range: 60-76 years), was 90% African American/Black (n = 36) and 45% male (n = 18). Thereafter, in 2021-2022, n = 37 individuals in the same area were recruited as a comparison group and not given health coaching (control group), mean age of 65.5 years (range: 57-83 years), 92% African American/Black (n = 34), and 50% male (n = 18).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated-measures intervention effects were seen for cognitive ability, indicating greater improvement in the intervention group (p < .01). Significant difference scores indicated greater cognitive ability (p < .01) and physical activity (p < .001) gains in the intervention group, with intervention subjects with reported memory problems showed relatively less physical activity gains (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This work creates the impetus for future large-scale AD risk reduction investigations to mitigate and improve modifiable risk among diverse older adults. Our positive trends in AD risk reduction support telephone-based health coaching as a feasible AD risk reduction intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":51347,"journal":{"name":"Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alzheimer's Disease Risk Reduction Health Coaching: Comparative Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Faika Zanjani, Brian Battle, Joann Richardson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geront/gnae106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Recent guidelines point to lifestyle as a tool for decreasing Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. To address the limited practice and availability of AD risk reduction interventions, this study aimed to explore the feasibility of a community-level lifestyle intervention targeting high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Diverse older adults (60+) living in the Richmond, VA, local area, with the following risk factors, incomes below $12,000/year and managing diabetes or cardiovascular disease, were offered weekly lifestyle telephone health coaching for 12 weeks in 2019-2020 (intervention group). The health coaching sessions provided Alzheimer's disease (AD) lifestyle risk reduction education and goal setting/planning. The intervention sample (n = 40, mean age 68 years (range: 60-76 years), was 90% African American/Black (n = 36) and 45% male (n = 18). Thereafter, in 2021-2022, n = 37 individuals in the same area were recruited as a comparison group and not given health coaching (control group), mean age of 65.5 years (range: 57-83 years), 92% African American/Black (n = 34), and 50% male (n = 18).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated-measures intervention effects were seen for cognitive ability, indicating greater improvement in the intervention group (p < .01). Significant difference scores indicated greater cognitive ability (p < .01) and physical activity (p < .001) gains in the intervention group, with intervention subjects with reported memory problems showed relatively less physical activity gains (p < .05).</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>This work creates the impetus for future large-scale AD risk reduction investigations to mitigate and improve modifiable risk among diverse older adults. Our positive trends in AD risk reduction support telephone-based health coaching as a feasible AD risk reduction intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerontologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerontologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae106\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnae106","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Alzheimer's Disease Risk Reduction Health Coaching: Comparative Analysis.
Background and objectives: Recent guidelines point to lifestyle as a tool for decreasing Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk. To address the limited practice and availability of AD risk reduction interventions, this study aimed to explore the feasibility of a community-level lifestyle intervention targeting high-risk groups.
Research design and methods: Diverse older adults (60+) living in the Richmond, VA, local area, with the following risk factors, incomes below $12,000/year and managing diabetes or cardiovascular disease, were offered weekly lifestyle telephone health coaching for 12 weeks in 2019-2020 (intervention group). The health coaching sessions provided Alzheimer's disease (AD) lifestyle risk reduction education and goal setting/planning. The intervention sample (n = 40, mean age 68 years (range: 60-76 years), was 90% African American/Black (n = 36) and 45% male (n = 18). Thereafter, in 2021-2022, n = 37 individuals in the same area were recruited as a comparison group and not given health coaching (control group), mean age of 65.5 years (range: 57-83 years), 92% African American/Black (n = 34), and 50% male (n = 18).
Results: Repeated-measures intervention effects were seen for cognitive ability, indicating greater improvement in the intervention group (p < .01). Significant difference scores indicated greater cognitive ability (p < .01) and physical activity (p < .001) gains in the intervention group, with intervention subjects with reported memory problems showed relatively less physical activity gains (p < .05).
Discussion and implications: This work creates the impetus for future large-scale AD risk reduction investigations to mitigate and improve modifiable risk among diverse older adults. Our positive trends in AD risk reduction support telephone-based health coaching as a feasible AD risk reduction intervention.
期刊介绍:
The Gerontologist, published since 1961, is a bimonthly journal of The Gerontological Society of America that provides a multidisciplinary perspective on human aging by publishing research and analysis on applied social issues. It informs the broad community of disciplines and professions involved in understanding the aging process and providing care to older people. Articles should include a conceptual framework and testable hypotheses. Implications for policy or practice should be highlighted. The Gerontologist publishes quantitative and qualitative research and encourages manuscript submissions of various types including: research articles, intervention research, review articles, measurement articles, forums, and brief reports. Book and media reviews, International Spotlights, and award-winning lectures are commissioned by the editors.