接受艾瑞布林或卡培他滨治疗的HER2缺失和HER2低下晚期乳腺癌的临床病理和预后特征。

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1007/s12282-024-01617-y
Rui Kitadai, Tatsunori Shimoi, Shu Yazaki, Hitomi Sumiyoshi Okuma, Mai Hoshino, Munehiro Ito, Ayumi Saito, Shosuke Kita, Yuki Kojima, Tadaaki Nishikawa, Kazuki Sudo, Emi Noguchi, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Masayuki Yoshida, Kan Yonemori
{"title":"接受艾瑞布林或卡培他滨治疗的HER2缺失和HER2低下晚期乳腺癌的临床病理和预后特征。","authors":"Rui Kitadai, Tatsunori Shimoi, Shu Yazaki, Hitomi Sumiyoshi Okuma, Mai Hoshino, Munehiro Ito, Ayumi Saito, Shosuke Kita, Yuki Kojima, Tadaaki Nishikawa, Kazuki Sudo, Emi Noguchi, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Masayuki Yoshida, Kan Yonemori","doi":"10.1007/s12282-024-01617-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HER2-low populations constitute a heterogeneous group, and the cytotoxic anticancer agent efficacy based on HER2 status remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer showing HER2-low expression treated with eribulin or capecitabine, two treatment options after anthracycline and taxane treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated patients who were treated with eribulin or capecitabine between 2011 and 2015. HER2 status was evaluated according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS; eribulin: hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.10; capecitabine: HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.45-1.30) or progression-free survival (PFS; eribulin: HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.72-1.78; capecitabine: HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.56-1.44) between patients receiving eribulin (HER2-null: 35, HER2-low: 44) and those receiving capecitabine (HER2-null: 41, HER2-low: 33). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in OS between the two groups in the hormone-positive and -negative populations for eribulin and capecitabine. HER2-null and HER2-low patients showed objective response rates (ORRs) of 22.5% and 9.1% (p = 0.09) overall, and 32.0% and 10.5% (p = 0.03), respectively, in hormone-positive cases among eribulin-treated patients. No response was observed in hormone-negative patients. Capecitabine treatment in HER2-null and HER2-low patients had overall ORRs of 26.8% and 15.2% (p = 0.23), respectively, with 27.3% and 16.1% (p = 0.28) for hormone-positive cases; and 25.0% and 0% (p = 1.0), respectively, for hormone-negative cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eribulin and capecitabine sensitivity may vary based on HER2 expression in patients with HER2-low and HER2-null breast cancer. Prognosis was similar between the HER2-low and the HER2-null groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinicopathological and prognostic features of HER2-null and HER2-low advanced breast cancer treated with eribulin or capecitabine.\",\"authors\":\"Rui Kitadai, Tatsunori Shimoi, Shu Yazaki, Hitomi Sumiyoshi Okuma, Mai Hoshino, Munehiro Ito, Ayumi Saito, Shosuke Kita, Yuki Kojima, Tadaaki Nishikawa, Kazuki Sudo, Emi Noguchi, Yasuhiro Fujiwara, Masayuki Yoshida, Kan Yonemori\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12282-024-01617-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>HER2-low populations constitute a heterogeneous group, and the cytotoxic anticancer agent efficacy based on HER2 status remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer showing HER2-low expression treated with eribulin or capecitabine, two treatment options after anthracycline and taxane treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated patients who were treated with eribulin or capecitabine between 2011 and 2015. HER2 status was evaluated according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS; eribulin: hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.10; capecitabine: HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.45-1.30) or progression-free survival (PFS; eribulin: HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.72-1.78; capecitabine: HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.56-1.44) between patients receiving eribulin (HER2-null: 35, HER2-low: 44) and those receiving capecitabine (HER2-null: 41, HER2-low: 33). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in OS between the two groups in the hormone-positive and -negative populations for eribulin and capecitabine. HER2-null and HER2-low patients showed objective response rates (ORRs) of 22.5% and 9.1% (p = 0.09) overall, and 32.0% and 10.5% (p = 0.03), respectively, in hormone-positive cases among eribulin-treated patients. No response was observed in hormone-negative patients. Capecitabine treatment in HER2-null and HER2-low patients had overall ORRs of 26.8% and 15.2% (p = 0.23), respectively, with 27.3% and 16.1% (p = 0.28) for hormone-positive cases; and 25.0% and 0% (p = 1.0), respectively, for hormone-negative cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eribulin and capecitabine sensitivity may vary based on HER2 expression in patients with HER2-low and HER2-null breast cancer. Prognosis was similar between the HER2-low and the HER2-null groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11489188/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-024-01617-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-024-01617-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:HER2低表达人群是一个异质性群体,基于HER2状态的细胞毒性抗癌药物疗效仍不明确。本研究评估了HER2低表达晚期乳腺癌患者接受艾瑞布林或卡培他滨治疗后的临床病理特征和预后:我们对2011年至2015年间接受艾瑞布林或卡培他滨治疗的患者进行了回顾性评估。根据ASCO/CAP指南评估HER2状态:总生存率(OS;埃瑞布林:危险比[HR],0.66;95% CI 0.40-1.10;卡培他滨:HR,0.76;95% CI 0.40-1.10)无明显差异:HR,0.76;95% CI,0.45-1.30)或无进展生存期(PFS,埃瑞布林:HR,1.13;95% CI,0.72-1.78;卡培他滨:HR,0.90;95% CI,0.72-1.78)有显著差异:HR,0.90;95% CI,0.56-1.44)之间的差异。亚组分析显示,在激素阳性和阴性人群中,埃瑞布林和卡培他滨两组的OS无明显差异。HER2空值和HER2低值患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为22.5%和9.1%(P = 0.09),在埃瑞布林治疗的患者中,激素阳性病例的客观反应率(ORR)分别为32.0%和10.5%(P = 0.03)。在激素阴性患者中未观察到反应。HER2-null和HER2-low患者接受卡培他滨治疗的总ORR分别为26.8%和15.2%(p = 0.23),激素阳性病例分别为27.3%和16.1%(p = 0.28);激素阴性病例分别为25.0%和0%(p = 1.0):结论:HER2-低表达和HER2-无效乳腺癌患者对伊瑞布林和卡培他滨的敏感性可能因HER2表达而异。HER2低表达组和HER2无效组的预后相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinicopathological and prognostic features of HER2-null and HER2-low advanced breast cancer treated with eribulin or capecitabine.

Background: HER2-low populations constitute a heterogeneous group, and the cytotoxic anticancer agent efficacy based on HER2 status remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer showing HER2-low expression treated with eribulin or capecitabine, two treatment options after anthracycline and taxane treatment.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who were treated with eribulin or capecitabine between 2011 and 2015. HER2 status was evaluated according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines.

Results: No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS; eribulin: hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.10; capecitabine: HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.45-1.30) or progression-free survival (PFS; eribulin: HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.72-1.78; capecitabine: HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.56-1.44) between patients receiving eribulin (HER2-null: 35, HER2-low: 44) and those receiving capecitabine (HER2-null: 41, HER2-low: 33). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in OS between the two groups in the hormone-positive and -negative populations for eribulin and capecitabine. HER2-null and HER2-low patients showed objective response rates (ORRs) of 22.5% and 9.1% (p = 0.09) overall, and 32.0% and 10.5% (p = 0.03), respectively, in hormone-positive cases among eribulin-treated patients. No response was observed in hormone-negative patients. Capecitabine treatment in HER2-null and HER2-low patients had overall ORRs of 26.8% and 15.2% (p = 0.23), respectively, with 27.3% and 16.1% (p = 0.28) for hormone-positive cases; and 25.0% and 0% (p = 1.0), respectively, for hormone-negative cases.

Conclusions: Eribulin and capecitabine sensitivity may vary based on HER2 expression in patients with HER2-low and HER2-null breast cancer. Prognosis was similar between the HER2-low and the HER2-null groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
期刊最新文献
Comparative assessment of breast volume using a smartphone device versus MRI. Correction: Trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with brain and/or leptomeningeal metastases: an updated overall survival analysis using data from a multicenter retrospective study (ROSET-BM). High-risk pathogenic germline variants in blood relatives of BRCA1/2 negative probands. Comparison of locoregional recurrence risk among nipple-sparing mastectomy, skin-sparing mastectomy, and simple mastectomy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: a single-center study. Development of a nomogram to predict recurrence scores obtained using Oncotype DX in Japanese patients with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1