全球价值链中能源和环境产品国际贸易的不均衡减排效应

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107621
Peiyu Wang , Xiyan Mao , Xianjin Huang
{"title":"全球价值链中能源和环境产品国际贸易的不均衡减排效应","authors":"Peiyu Wang ,&nbsp;Xiyan Mao ,&nbsp;Xianjin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>International trade in energy and environmental goods (EEGs) promotes the diffusion of green technologies and provides environmental benefits to trading countries. However, the uneven distribution of environmental benefits has hindered international negotiations on trade liberalization. This study investigates whether the disparity in technological content of EEGs leads to uneven emission reduction effects in the global value chain (GVC). Based on data panel covering 246 EEGs and 103 countries from 2001 to 2019, a dynamic threshold model was applied to examine the uneven emission reduction effects from the EEG trade. The results revealed that (1) the technological content of EEGs differs among countries, but this difference does not directly contribute to an uneven distribution of environmental benefits.(2) the technological content of EEGs impacts emissions through a threshold effect. Trading high-tech EEGs benefits from economies of scale, whereas trading low-tech EEGs suffers from diseconomies of scale. (3) The proportion of countries benefiting from trade in EEGs is increasing, with imports providing broader benefits than exports. These findings elucidate the situation and mechanism of the uneven distribution of environmental benefits in the EEG trade and offer insights into policy focus shifts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 107621"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uneven emission reduction effects of international trade in energy and environmental goods in the global value chain\",\"authors\":\"Peiyu Wang ,&nbsp;Xiyan Mao ,&nbsp;Xianjin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>International trade in energy and environmental goods (EEGs) promotes the diffusion of green technologies and provides environmental benefits to trading countries. However, the uneven distribution of environmental benefits has hindered international negotiations on trade liberalization. This study investigates whether the disparity in technological content of EEGs leads to uneven emission reduction effects in the global value chain (GVC). Based on data panel covering 246 EEGs and 103 countries from 2001 to 2019, a dynamic threshold model was applied to examine the uneven emission reduction effects from the EEG trade. The results revealed that (1) the technological content of EEGs differs among countries, but this difference does not directly contribute to an uneven distribution of environmental benefits.(2) the technological content of EEGs impacts emissions through a threshold effect. Trading high-tech EEGs benefits from economies of scale, whereas trading low-tech EEGs suffers from diseconomies of scale. (3) The proportion of countries benefiting from trade in EEGs is increasing, with imports providing broader benefits than exports. These findings elucidate the situation and mechanism of the uneven distribution of environmental benefits in the EEG trade and offer insights into policy focus shifts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002087\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源和环境产品(EEGs)的国际贸易促进了绿色技术的推广,并为贸易国带来了环境效益。然而,环境利益分配不均阻碍了贸易自由化的国际谈判。本研究探讨了环境产品和环境商品技术含量的差异是否会导致全球价值链(GVC)中减排效果的不均衡。基于 2001 年至 2019 年 246 个电子元件和 103 个国家的面板数据,运用动态阈值模型考察了电子元件贸易的不均衡减排效应。结果表明:(1)各国电子元件的技术含量不同,但这种差异并不直接导致环境效益的不均衡分配;(2)电子元件的技术含量通过阈值效应影响排放。交易高科技含量的电子元件可从规模经济中获益,而交易低技术含量的电子元件则会受到规模不经济的影响。(3) 受益于电子元件贸易的国家比例正在增加,进口比出口带来更广泛的利益。这些发现阐明了环境经济组贸易中环境效益分配不均的情况和机制,并为政策重点的转移提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uneven emission reduction effects of international trade in energy and environmental goods in the global value chain

International trade in energy and environmental goods (EEGs) promotes the diffusion of green technologies and provides environmental benefits to trading countries. However, the uneven distribution of environmental benefits has hindered international negotiations on trade liberalization. This study investigates whether the disparity in technological content of EEGs leads to uneven emission reduction effects in the global value chain (GVC). Based on data panel covering 246 EEGs and 103 countries from 2001 to 2019, a dynamic threshold model was applied to examine the uneven emission reduction effects from the EEG trade. The results revealed that (1) the technological content of EEGs differs among countries, but this difference does not directly contribute to an uneven distribution of environmental benefits.(2) the technological content of EEGs impacts emissions through a threshold effect. Trading high-tech EEGs benefits from economies of scale, whereas trading low-tech EEGs suffers from diseconomies of scale. (3) The proportion of countries benefiting from trade in EEGs is increasing, with imports providing broader benefits than exports. These findings elucidate the situation and mechanism of the uneven distribution of environmental benefits in the EEG trade and offer insights into policy focus shifts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
When differentiated carbon tax policy meets LBD of renewable energy and electrification of energy end-use: Policy implications of sectoral differentiation of carbon productivity and carbon emission Climate policy and carbon leakage: Evidence from the low-carbon city pilot program in China Reducing fertilizer and pesticide application through mandatory agri-environmental regulation: Insights from “Two Zero” policy in China Unveiling the heterogeneity of environmental impacts of China's coal washing plants by a configuration-specific life cycle assessment Moving in the landscape: Omnidirectional connectivity dynamics in China from 1985 to 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1