{"title":"全球价值链中能源和环境产品国际贸易的不均衡减排效应","authors":"Peiyu Wang , Xiyan Mao , Xianjin Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>International trade in energy and environmental goods (EEGs) promotes the diffusion of green technologies and provides environmental benefits to trading countries. However, the uneven distribution of environmental benefits has hindered international negotiations on trade liberalization. This study investigates whether the disparity in technological content of EEGs leads to uneven emission reduction effects in the global value chain (GVC). Based on data panel covering 246 EEGs and 103 countries from 2001 to 2019, a dynamic threshold model was applied to examine the uneven emission reduction effects from the EEG trade. The results revealed that (1) the technological content of EEGs differs among countries, but this difference does not directly contribute to an uneven distribution of environmental benefits.(2) the technological content of EEGs impacts emissions through a threshold effect. Trading high-tech EEGs benefits from economies of scale, whereas trading low-tech EEGs suffers from diseconomies of scale. (3) The proportion of countries benefiting from trade in EEGs is increasing, with imports providing broader benefits than exports. These findings elucidate the situation and mechanism of the uneven distribution of environmental benefits in the EEG trade and offer insights into policy focus shifts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 107621"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uneven emission reduction effects of international trade in energy and environmental goods in the global value chain\",\"authors\":\"Peiyu Wang , Xiyan Mao , Xianjin Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>International trade in energy and environmental goods (EEGs) promotes the diffusion of green technologies and provides environmental benefits to trading countries. However, the uneven distribution of environmental benefits has hindered international negotiations on trade liberalization. This study investigates whether the disparity in technological content of EEGs leads to uneven emission reduction effects in the global value chain (GVC). Based on data panel covering 246 EEGs and 103 countries from 2001 to 2019, a dynamic threshold model was applied to examine the uneven emission reduction effects from the EEG trade. The results revealed that (1) the technological content of EEGs differs among countries, but this difference does not directly contribute to an uneven distribution of environmental benefits.(2) the technological content of EEGs impacts emissions through a threshold effect. Trading high-tech EEGs benefits from economies of scale, whereas trading low-tech EEGs suffers from diseconomies of scale. (3) The proportion of countries benefiting from trade in EEGs is increasing, with imports providing broader benefits than exports. These findings elucidate the situation and mechanism of the uneven distribution of environmental benefits in the EEG trade and offer insights into policy focus shifts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002087\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uneven emission reduction effects of international trade in energy and environmental goods in the global value chain
International trade in energy and environmental goods (EEGs) promotes the diffusion of green technologies and provides environmental benefits to trading countries. However, the uneven distribution of environmental benefits has hindered international negotiations on trade liberalization. This study investigates whether the disparity in technological content of EEGs leads to uneven emission reduction effects in the global value chain (GVC). Based on data panel covering 246 EEGs and 103 countries from 2001 to 2019, a dynamic threshold model was applied to examine the uneven emission reduction effects from the EEG trade. The results revealed that (1) the technological content of EEGs differs among countries, but this difference does not directly contribute to an uneven distribution of environmental benefits.(2) the technological content of EEGs impacts emissions through a threshold effect. Trading high-tech EEGs benefits from economies of scale, whereas trading low-tech EEGs suffers from diseconomies of scale. (3) The proportion of countries benefiting from trade in EEGs is increasing, with imports providing broader benefits than exports. These findings elucidate the situation and mechanism of the uneven distribution of environmental benefits in the EEG trade and offer insights into policy focus shifts.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.