"锦上添花 "还是 "雪中送炭"?来自中国的大气污染治理生态补偿证据

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Impact Assessment Review Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107620
Dunhu Chang , Zeyang Zhang , Hancheng Song , Jian Wu , Xin Wang , Zhanfeng Dong
{"title":"\"锦上添花 \"还是 \"雪中送炭\"?来自中国的大气污染治理生态补偿证据","authors":"Dunhu Chang ,&nbsp;Zeyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Hancheng Song ,&nbsp;Jian Wu ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Zhanfeng Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ecological compensation is a crucial measure to balance the interests of all stakeholders and mobilize local government's initiative in pollution control, while the relationship between ecological compensation and environmental quality standards may influence the policy effect. This study investigates the impact of China's first ecological compensation policy for air pollution control—Shandong Province's Ambient Air Quality Ecological Compensation (AAQEC) policy—on ambient air quality, and explores the appropriate relationship between ecological compensation and environmental quality standards. The theoretical model suggests that the lenient punishment for substandard environmental quality deviates the incentives of the AAQEC that targets multiple pollutants, thereby limiting its effectiveness in improving overall regional ambient air quality. Utilizing monthly air pollutant concentration data and employing a continuous difference-in-difference approach, the empirical results show that the AAQEC acts as a guaranteed measure to assist local governments in achieving environmental quality compliance. The AAQEC effectively reduces SO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations through incentivizing environmental protection expenditures and green transformation of development mode, while the effect on controlling the key pollutant with severe exceedance is not observed—the concentration of PM<sub>10</sub> does not change significantly. The above plight is attributable to local government's strategic behaviors of selecting pollutants with higher marginal net benefit of pollutant abatement for priority treatment regardless of actual pollution conditions, resulting in the partial improvement in ambient air quality. These findings indicate that a flexible ecological compensation policy should be established with punishment imposed for substandard environmental quality, playing its role in enhancing local governments' environmental governance capacity and further improving overall ambient air quality based on compliance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 107620"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Icing on the cake” or “fuel delivered in the snow”? Evidence from China on ecological compensation for air pollution control\",\"authors\":\"Dunhu Chang ,&nbsp;Zeyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Hancheng Song ,&nbsp;Jian Wu ,&nbsp;Xin Wang ,&nbsp;Zhanfeng Dong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Ecological compensation is a crucial measure to balance the interests of all stakeholders and mobilize local government's initiative in pollution control, while the relationship between ecological compensation and environmental quality standards may influence the policy effect. This study investigates the impact of China's first ecological compensation policy for air pollution control—Shandong Province's Ambient Air Quality Ecological Compensation (AAQEC) policy—on ambient air quality, and explores the appropriate relationship between ecological compensation and environmental quality standards. The theoretical model suggests that the lenient punishment for substandard environmental quality deviates the incentives of the AAQEC that targets multiple pollutants, thereby limiting its effectiveness in improving overall regional ambient air quality. Utilizing monthly air pollutant concentration data and employing a continuous difference-in-difference approach, the empirical results show that the AAQEC acts as a guaranteed measure to assist local governments in achieving environmental quality compliance. The AAQEC effectively reduces SO<sub>2</sub> and PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations through incentivizing environmental protection expenditures and green transformation of development mode, while the effect on controlling the key pollutant with severe exceedance is not observed—the concentration of PM<sub>10</sub> does not change significantly. The above plight is attributable to local government's strategic behaviors of selecting pollutants with higher marginal net benefit of pollutant abatement for priority treatment regardless of actual pollution conditions, resulting in the partial improvement in ambient air quality. These findings indicate that a flexible ecological compensation policy should be established with punishment imposed for substandard environmental quality, playing its role in enhancing local governments' environmental governance capacity and further improving overall ambient air quality based on compliance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Impact Assessment Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002075\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524002075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生态补偿是平衡各利益相关方利益、调动地方政府污染治理积极性的重要措施,而生态补偿与环境质量标准之间的关系可能会影响政策效果。本研究考察了中国首个大气污染防治生态补偿政策--山东省环境空气质量生态补偿政策对环境空气质量的影响,并探讨了生态补偿与环境质量标准之间的适当关系。理论模型表明,对环境质量不达标者的宽松惩罚偏离了针对多种污染物的 AAQEC 的激励机制,从而限制了其改善区域整体环境空气质量的效果。利用月度空气污染物浓度数据和连续差分法,实证结果表明 AAQEC 是帮助地方政府实现环境质量达标的保障措施。AAQEC 通过激励环保支出和发展模式的绿色转型,有效降低了二氧化硫和 PM2.5 的浓度,但对严重超标的关键污染物 PM10 的控制效果并不明显。造成上述困境的原因在于地方政府不顾实际污染状况,选择边际净减排效益较高的污染物进行优先治理的策略行为,导致环境空气质量的局部改善。这些研究结果表明,应建立灵活的生态补偿政策,对环境质量不达标者进行惩罚,发挥其在提高地方政府环境治理能力方面的作用,在达标的基础上进一步改善整体环境空气质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Icing on the cake” or “fuel delivered in the snow”? Evidence from China on ecological compensation for air pollution control

Ecological compensation is a crucial measure to balance the interests of all stakeholders and mobilize local government's initiative in pollution control, while the relationship between ecological compensation and environmental quality standards may influence the policy effect. This study investigates the impact of China's first ecological compensation policy for air pollution control—Shandong Province's Ambient Air Quality Ecological Compensation (AAQEC) policy—on ambient air quality, and explores the appropriate relationship between ecological compensation and environmental quality standards. The theoretical model suggests that the lenient punishment for substandard environmental quality deviates the incentives of the AAQEC that targets multiple pollutants, thereby limiting its effectiveness in improving overall regional ambient air quality. Utilizing monthly air pollutant concentration data and employing a continuous difference-in-difference approach, the empirical results show that the AAQEC acts as a guaranteed measure to assist local governments in achieving environmental quality compliance. The AAQEC effectively reduces SO2 and PM2.5 concentrations through incentivizing environmental protection expenditures and green transformation of development mode, while the effect on controlling the key pollutant with severe exceedance is not observed—the concentration of PM10 does not change significantly. The above plight is attributable to local government's strategic behaviors of selecting pollutants with higher marginal net benefit of pollutant abatement for priority treatment regardless of actual pollution conditions, resulting in the partial improvement in ambient air quality. These findings indicate that a flexible ecological compensation policy should be established with punishment imposed for substandard environmental quality, playing its role in enhancing local governments' environmental governance capacity and further improving overall ambient air quality based on compliance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of potential topsoil organic carbon loss due to industrial complex development: Implications for topsoil conservation in South Korea The cost of rural environmental degradation in China: An integrated evaluation framework and city-level case study Dynamic lifecycle emissions of electric and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in a multi-regional perspective Assessing the impact of emission trading scheme and carbon tax in the building sector: An embodied carbon perspective A systematic review of life cycle assessment and environmental footprint for the global coffee value chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1