纳他珠单抗疗法治疗 "次优疗法 "患者中高度活跃的复发缓解型多发性硬化症的文献综述和荟萃分析

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of the Neurological Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1016/j.jns.2024.123172
{"title":"纳他珠单抗疗法治疗 \"次优疗法 \"患者中高度活跃的复发缓解型多发性硬化症的文献综述和荟萃分析","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Highly active (HA) relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is associated with frequent relapses and high burden of disease/disability. Natalizumab is licensed for HA RRMS, including rapidly evolving severe (RES) (≥2 relapses in previous year) and sub-optimally treated (SOT) (≥1 relapse in previous year despite treatment) populations. However, there is limited RCT evidence in the SOT subpopulation.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To review the non-RCT evidence for natalizumab in SOT HA RRMS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Databases were searched to January 2023 for non-randomised studies of natalizumab in HA RRMS. Studies in patients with ≥1 relapse during previous treatment were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses were conducted to compare natalizumab with platform and higher efficacy disease-modifying therapies, with sensitivity analysis restricted to studies of low risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Included comparative studies (<em>n</em> = 16) showed natalizumab had lower relapse rates, disease activity and MRI (radiological) outcomes compared with platform and higher efficacy therapy. Case series (<em>n</em> = 11) showed natalizumab was associated with high rates of freedom from relapse and clinical/radiological disease activity and reductions in annualised relapse rate and disability progression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Literature reviewed indicates that natalizumab is more effective than other included treatments for SOT patients. Findings were consistent with studies in the broad HA RRMS population, suggesting that natalizumab may have similar efficacy for SOT and RES HA RRMS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17417,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24003071/pdfft?md5=379dd39647af789f9e6f1bf6fc079e7c&pid=1-s2.0-S0022510X24003071-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literature review and meta-analysis of natalizumab therapy for the treatment of highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the ‘suboptimal therapy’ patient population\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jns.2024.123172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Highly active (HA) relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is associated with frequent relapses and high burden of disease/disability. Natalizumab is licensed for HA RRMS, including rapidly evolving severe (RES) (≥2 relapses in previous year) and sub-optimally treated (SOT) (≥1 relapse in previous year despite treatment) populations. However, there is limited RCT evidence in the SOT subpopulation.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To review the non-RCT evidence for natalizumab in SOT HA RRMS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Databases were searched to January 2023 for non-randomised studies of natalizumab in HA RRMS. Studies in patients with ≥1 relapse during previous treatment were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses were conducted to compare natalizumab with platform and higher efficacy disease-modifying therapies, with sensitivity analysis restricted to studies of low risk of bias.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Included comparative studies (<em>n</em> = 16) showed natalizumab had lower relapse rates, disease activity and MRI (radiological) outcomes compared with platform and higher efficacy therapy. Case series (<em>n</em> = 11) showed natalizumab was associated with high rates of freedom from relapse and clinical/radiological disease activity and reductions in annualised relapse rate and disability progression.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Literature reviewed indicates that natalizumab is more effective than other included treatments for SOT patients. Findings were consistent with studies in the broad HA RRMS population, suggesting that natalizumab may have similar efficacy for SOT and RES HA RRMS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Neurological Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24003071/pdfft?md5=379dd39647af789f9e6f1bf6fc079e7c&pid=1-s2.0-S0022510X24003071-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Neurological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24003071\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022510X24003071","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景高活动性(HA)复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)与频繁复发和高疾病/残疾负担有关。纳他珠单抗获准用于HA RRMS,包括快速发展的重症(RES)(前一年复发≥2次)和次优治疗(SOT)(尽管接受了治疗,但前一年复发≥1次)人群。方法检索了截至2023年1月有关纳他珠单抗治疗HA RRMS的非随机研究数据库。符合纳入条件的研究对象为既往治疗期间复发≥1次的患者。结果纳入的比较研究(n = 16)显示,与平台疗法和高效疗法相比,纳他珠单抗的复发率、疾病活动性和MRI(放射学)结果较低。病例系列研究(n = 11)显示,纳他珠单抗的复发率和临床/放射学疾病活动率较高,年复发率和残疾进展率也有所降低。结论综述的文献表明,纳他珠单抗对SOT和RES HA RRMS患者的疗效优于其他治疗方法。研究结果与对广泛的HA RRMS人群的研究结果一致,表明纳他珠单抗对SOT和RES HA RRMS可能具有相似的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Literature review and meta-analysis of natalizumab therapy for the treatment of highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in the ‘suboptimal therapy’ patient population

Background

Highly active (HA) relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is associated with frequent relapses and high burden of disease/disability. Natalizumab is licensed for HA RRMS, including rapidly evolving severe (RES) (≥2 relapses in previous year) and sub-optimally treated (SOT) (≥1 relapse in previous year despite treatment) populations. However, there is limited RCT evidence in the SOT subpopulation.

Objective

To review the non-RCT evidence for natalizumab in SOT HA RRMS.

Methods

Databases were searched to January 2023 for non-randomised studies of natalizumab in HA RRMS. Studies in patients with ≥1 relapse during previous treatment were eligible for inclusion. Meta-analyses were conducted to compare natalizumab with platform and higher efficacy disease-modifying therapies, with sensitivity analysis restricted to studies of low risk of bias.

Results

Included comparative studies (n = 16) showed natalizumab had lower relapse rates, disease activity and MRI (radiological) outcomes compared with platform and higher efficacy therapy. Case series (n = 11) showed natalizumab was associated with high rates of freedom from relapse and clinical/radiological disease activity and reductions in annualised relapse rate and disability progression.

Conclusions

Literature reviewed indicates that natalizumab is more effective than other included treatments for SOT patients. Findings were consistent with studies in the broad HA RRMS population, suggesting that natalizumab may have similar efficacy for SOT and RES HA RRMS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Journal of the Neurological Sciences 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
313
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Neurological Sciences provides a medium for the prompt publication of original articles in neurology and neuroscience from around the world. JNS places special emphasis on articles that: 1) provide guidance to clinicians around the world (Best Practices, Global Neurology); 2) report cutting-edge science related to neurology (Basic and Translational Sciences); 3) educate readers about relevant and practical clinical outcomes in neurology (Outcomes Research); and 4) summarize or editorialize the current state of the literature (Reviews, Commentaries, and Editorials). JNS accepts most types of manuscripts for consideration including original research papers, short communications, reviews, book reviews, letters to the Editor, opinions and editorials. Topics considered will be from neurology-related fields that are of interest to practicing physicians around the world. Examples include neuromuscular diseases, demyelination, atrophies, dementia, neoplasms, infections, epilepsies, disturbances of consciousness, stroke and cerebral circulation, growth and development, plasticity and intermediary metabolism.
期刊最新文献
Importance of focusing on subjective symptoms to maintain quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease for over 5 years. Bridging transdisciplinary in medical education: A pathway to achieve SDG 3 in Global Health. Response to letter from Catamo, Costa, Buque & Nzwalo (2024) titled "Possible role of mycotoxins, malnutrition and MECP2 dysregulation in nodding syndrome" regarding Spencer, Valdes Angues & Palmer's paper titled "Nodding syndrome: A role for environmental biotoxins that dysregulate MECP2 expression?" JNS. 2024;462:123077. Doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2024.123077. Response to the letter “Acute stroke care inequities: Cross-cultural insights and the need for multi-ethnic research” Possible role of mycotoxins, malnutrition and MECP2 dysregulation in nodding syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1