评估用于粘接乳牙釉质的最佳蚀刻时间和窝沟封闭材料:体外研究

IF 3.2 3区 材料科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103811
{"title":"评估用于粘接乳牙釉质的最佳蚀刻时间和窝沟封闭材料:体外研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The recommended 15-s acid etching time expands the enamel surface and facilitates the infiltration of restorative materials. Because of this clinical advantage, 15 and 30 s have become the most prevalent acid etching times in recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of conventional and self-adhesive flowable composites (SAFCs) that were etched for different durations on primary molar teeth. Teeth were divided into eight groups (n = 16) and restored either with Vertise™ Flow and orthophosphoric acid or with Conseal F and orthophosphoric acid for 15, 30, 45, or 60 s. Then, the specimens were subjected to shear stress at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until the bond failed. After conducting the microshear bond strength (μSBS) test, failure modes were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy at 80 × magnification. Statistical analysis was performed using Independent sample T-tests and other T-tests (p &lt; 0.05). According to the μSBS results, a statistically significant difference was observed among all groups (p &lt; 0.05). Additionally, there were statistically significant differences between both restorative materials after etching for 15 s (p = 0.011; p &lt; 0.05) and 60 s (p &lt; 0.001; p &lt; 0.05). While adhesive-type fractures were mostly observed in the SAFC groups, mixed-type fractures analyzed by scanning electron microscopy were determined to be relatively common in the Conseal F groups. An etching time of 15 s for primary tooth enamel was recommended instead of 60 s for all fissure sealants. In addition, the application of Vertise™ Flow after 15 s of acid etching was preferred over the application of Conseal F.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13732,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the optimal etching times and fissure sealant materials for bonding on primary teeth enamel: An in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2024.103811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The recommended 15-s acid etching time expands the enamel surface and facilitates the infiltration of restorative materials. Because of this clinical advantage, 15 and 30 s have become the most prevalent acid etching times in recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of conventional and self-adhesive flowable composites (SAFCs) that were etched for different durations on primary molar teeth. Teeth were divided into eight groups (n = 16) and restored either with Vertise™ Flow and orthophosphoric acid or with Conseal F and orthophosphoric acid for 15, 30, 45, or 60 s. Then, the specimens were subjected to shear stress at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until the bond failed. After conducting the microshear bond strength (μSBS) test, failure modes were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy at 80 × magnification. Statistical analysis was performed using Independent sample T-tests and other T-tests (p &lt; 0.05). According to the μSBS results, a statistically significant difference was observed among all groups (p &lt; 0.05). Additionally, there were statistically significant differences between both restorative materials after etching for 15 s (p = 0.011; p &lt; 0.05) and 60 s (p &lt; 0.001; p &lt; 0.05). While adhesive-type fractures were mostly observed in the SAFC groups, mixed-type fractures analyzed by scanning electron microscopy were determined to be relatively common in the Conseal F groups. An etching time of 15 s for primary tooth enamel was recommended instead of 60 s for all fissure sealants. In addition, the application of Vertise™ Flow after 15 s of acid etching was preferred over the application of Conseal F.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749624001933\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749624001933","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

建议的 15 秒酸蚀时间可以扩展釉质表面,有利于修复材料的渗入。由于这种临床优势,15 秒和 30 秒已成为近年来最常用的酸蚀时间。本研究旨在评估传统和自粘性可流动复合材料(SAFCs)不同酸蚀时间对初级磨牙的影响。将牙齿分为八组(n = 16),分别用 Vertise™ Flow 和正磷酸或 Conseal F 和正磷酸修复 15、30、45 或 60 秒。然后,以 1 mm/min 的十字头速度对试样施加剪切应力,直至粘接失败。在进行微剪切粘接强度(μSBS)测试后,使用放大 80 倍的扫描电子显微镜分析失效模式。统计分析采用独立样本 T 检验和其他 T 检验(p < 0.05)。根据 μSBS 结果,各组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。此外,两种修复材料在蚀刻 15 秒(p = 0.011;p <;0.05)和 60 秒(p <;0.001;p <;0.05)后的差异也有统计学意义。通过扫描电子显微镜分析发现,粘合型断裂主要出现在 SAFC 组中,而混合型断裂在 Conseal F 组中相对常见。建议对原生牙釉质的蚀刻时间为 15 秒,而不是所有裂隙封闭剂的 60 秒。此外,酸蚀 15 秒后使用 Vertise™ Flow 比使用 Conseal F 更可取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the optimal etching times and fissure sealant materials for bonding on primary teeth enamel: An in vitro study

The recommended 15-s acid etching time expands the enamel surface and facilitates the infiltration of restorative materials. Because of this clinical advantage, 15 and 30 s have become the most prevalent acid etching times in recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of conventional and self-adhesive flowable composites (SAFCs) that were etched for different durations on primary molar teeth. Teeth were divided into eight groups (n = 16) and restored either with Vertise™ Flow and orthophosphoric acid or with Conseal F and orthophosphoric acid for 15, 30, 45, or 60 s. Then, the specimens were subjected to shear stress at a cross-head speed of 1 mm/min until the bond failed. After conducting the microshear bond strength (μSBS) test, failure modes were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy at 80 × magnification. Statistical analysis was performed using Independent sample T-tests and other T-tests (p < 0.05). According to the μSBS results, a statistically significant difference was observed among all groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were statistically significant differences between both restorative materials after etching for 15 s (p = 0.011; p < 0.05) and 60 s (p < 0.001; p < 0.05). While adhesive-type fractures were mostly observed in the SAFC groups, mixed-type fractures analyzed by scanning electron microscopy were determined to be relatively common in the Conseal F groups. An etching time of 15 s for primary tooth enamel was recommended instead of 60 s for all fissure sealants. In addition, the application of Vertise™ Flow after 15 s of acid etching was preferred over the application of Conseal F.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives
International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
200
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives draws together the many aspects of the science and technology of adhesive materials, from fundamental research and development work to industrial applications. Subject areas covered include: interfacial interactions, surface chemistry, methods of testing, accumulation of test data on physical and mechanical properties, environmental effects, new adhesive materials, sealants, design of bonded joints, and manufacturing technology.
期刊最新文献
Effect of glass-ceramic thickness on the degree of conversion, polymerization shrinkage stress, and bond strength of resin cements 30-Month performance of a 10-MDP based universal adhesive system under mechanical and biological perspectives Preparation and characterization of UV-Curable phosphate ester-containing acrylate resin adhesive for dental zirconia restorations Strength improvement and failure analysis of dissimilar FDM printed single-lap joints with tailored interface geometry Creep damage laws for bonded joints under pure mode II loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1