Liam Weaver, Hossein Shamohammadi, Sina Saffaran, Roberto Tonelli, Marianna Laviola, John G Laffey, Luigi Camporota, Timothy E Scott, Jonathan G Hardman, Enrico Clini, Declan G Bates
{"title":"急性低氧血症呼吸衰竭患者的数字双胞胎提示了无创通气成功和失败的机制基础。","authors":"Liam Weaver, Hossein Shamohammadi, Sina Saffaran, Roberto Tonelli, Marianna Laviola, John G Laffey, Luigi Camporota, Timothy E Scott, Jonathan G Hardman, Enrico Clini, Declan G Bates","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To clarify the mechanistic basis for the success or failure of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We created digital twins based on mechanistic computational models of individual patients with AHRF.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Systems Medicine Research Network.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>We used individual patient data from 30 moderate-to-severe AHRF patients who had failed high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and subsequently underwent a trial of NIV.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Using the digital twins, we evaluated lung mechanics, quantified the separate contributions of external support and patient respiratory effort to lung injury indices, and investigated their relative impact on NIV success or failure.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In digital twins of patients who successfully completed/failed NIV, after 2 hours of the trial the mean (sd) of the change in total lung stress was -10.9 (6.2)/-0.35 (3.38) cm H2O, mechanical power -13.4 (12.2)/-1.0 (5.4) J/min, and total lung strain 0.02 (0.24)/0.16 (0.30). In the digital twins, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) produced by HFNC was similar to that set during NIV. In digital twins of patients who failed NIV vs. those who succeeded, intrinsic PEEP was 3.5 (0.6) vs. 2.3 (0.8) cm H2O, inspiratory pressure support was 8.3 (5.9) vs. 22.3 (7.2) cm H2O, and tidal volume was 10.9 (1.2) vs. 9.4 (1.8) mL/kg. In digital twins, successful NIV increased respiratory system compliance +25.0 (16.4) mL/cm H2O, lowered inspiratory muscle pressure -9.7 (9.6) cm H2O, and reduced the contribution of patient spontaneous breathing to total driving pressure by 57.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In digital twins of AHRF patients, successful NIV improved lung mechanics, lowering respiratory effort and indices associated with lung injury. NIV failed in patients for whom only low levels of positive inspiratory pressure support could be applied without risking patient self-inflicted lung injury due to excessive tidal volumes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":"52 9","pages":"e473-e484"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321607/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Twins of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Patients Suggest a Mechanistic Basis for Success and Failure of Noninvasive Ventilation.\",\"authors\":\"Liam Weaver, Hossein Shamohammadi, Sina Saffaran, Roberto Tonelli, Marianna Laviola, John G Laffey, Luigi Camporota, Timothy E Scott, Jonathan G Hardman, Enrico Clini, Declan G Bates\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To clarify the mechanistic basis for the success or failure of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We created digital twins based on mechanistic computational models of individual patients with AHRF.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Systems Medicine Research Network.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>We used individual patient data from 30 moderate-to-severe AHRF patients who had failed high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and subsequently underwent a trial of NIV.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Using the digital twins, we evaluated lung mechanics, quantified the separate contributions of external support and patient respiratory effort to lung injury indices, and investigated their relative impact on NIV success or failure.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>In digital twins of patients who successfully completed/failed NIV, after 2 hours of the trial the mean (sd) of the change in total lung stress was -10.9 (6.2)/-0.35 (3.38) cm H2O, mechanical power -13.4 (12.2)/-1.0 (5.4) J/min, and total lung strain 0.02 (0.24)/0.16 (0.30). In the digital twins, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) produced by HFNC was similar to that set during NIV. In digital twins of patients who failed NIV vs. those who succeeded, intrinsic PEEP was 3.5 (0.6) vs. 2.3 (0.8) cm H2O, inspiratory pressure support was 8.3 (5.9) vs. 22.3 (7.2) cm H2O, and tidal volume was 10.9 (1.2) vs. 9.4 (1.8) mL/kg. In digital twins, successful NIV increased respiratory system compliance +25.0 (16.4) mL/cm H2O, lowered inspiratory muscle pressure -9.7 (9.6) cm H2O, and reduced the contribution of patient spontaneous breathing to total driving pressure by 57.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In digital twins of AHRF patients, successful NIV improved lung mechanics, lowering respiratory effort and indices associated with lung injury. NIV failed in patients for whom only low levels of positive inspiratory pressure support could be applied without risking patient self-inflicted lung injury due to excessive tidal volumes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"e473-e484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321607/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006337\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006337","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的阐明急性低氧血症呼吸衰竭(AHRF)患者无创通气(NIV)成功或失败的机理基础:我们根据 AHRF 患者的机理计算模型创建了数字双胞胎:环境:系统医学研究网络跨学科合作:我们使用了 30 名中重度 AHRF 患者的个体数据,这些患者曾接受高流量鼻插管 (HFNC) 治疗失败,随后接受了 NIV 试验:利用数字双胞胎,我们评估了肺力学,量化了外部支持和患者呼吸努力对肺损伤指数的不同贡献,并研究了它们对 NIV 成败的相对影响:在成功完成/失败 NIV 的数字双胞胎患者中,试验 2 小时后肺总压力变化的平均值(sd)为 -10.9 (6.2)/-0.35 (3.38) cm H2O,机械功率为 -13.4 (12.2)/-1.0 (5.4) J/min,肺总应变为 0.02 (0.24)/0.16 (0.30)。在数字双胞胎中,HFNC 产生的呼气末正压(PEEP)与 NIV 期间设定的呼气末正压相似。在 NIV 失败与 NIV 成功的数字双胞胎患者中,内在 PEEP 为 3.5 (0.6) cm H2O vs. 2.3 (0.8) cm H2O,吸气压力支持为 8.3 (5.9) cm H2O vs. 22.3 (7.2) cm H2O,潮气量为 10.9 (1.2) mL/kg vs. 9.4 (1.8) mL/kg。在数字双胞胎中,成功的 NIV 增加了呼吸系统顺应性 +25.0 (16.4) mL/cm H2O,降低了吸气肌压力 -9.7 (9.6) cm H2O,并将患者自主呼吸对总驱动压力的贡献率降低了 57.0%:结论:在数字化双胞胎 AHRF 患者中,成功的 NIV 改善了肺力学,降低了呼吸强度和与肺损伤相关的指标。对于只能使用低水平吸气正压支持而不会因潮气量过大导致患者自身肺损伤的患者,NIV 是失败的。
Digital Twins of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Patients Suggest a Mechanistic Basis for Success and Failure of Noninvasive Ventilation.
Objectives: To clarify the mechanistic basis for the success or failure of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF).
Design: We created digital twins based on mechanistic computational models of individual patients with AHRF.
Setting: Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Systems Medicine Research Network.
Subjects: We used individual patient data from 30 moderate-to-severe AHRF patients who had failed high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and subsequently underwent a trial of NIV.
Interventions: Using the digital twins, we evaluated lung mechanics, quantified the separate contributions of external support and patient respiratory effort to lung injury indices, and investigated their relative impact on NIV success or failure.
Measurements and main results: In digital twins of patients who successfully completed/failed NIV, after 2 hours of the trial the mean (sd) of the change in total lung stress was -10.9 (6.2)/-0.35 (3.38) cm H2O, mechanical power -13.4 (12.2)/-1.0 (5.4) J/min, and total lung strain 0.02 (0.24)/0.16 (0.30). In the digital twins, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) produced by HFNC was similar to that set during NIV. In digital twins of patients who failed NIV vs. those who succeeded, intrinsic PEEP was 3.5 (0.6) vs. 2.3 (0.8) cm H2O, inspiratory pressure support was 8.3 (5.9) vs. 22.3 (7.2) cm H2O, and tidal volume was 10.9 (1.2) vs. 9.4 (1.8) mL/kg. In digital twins, successful NIV increased respiratory system compliance +25.0 (16.4) mL/cm H2O, lowered inspiratory muscle pressure -9.7 (9.6) cm H2O, and reduced the contribution of patient spontaneous breathing to total driving pressure by 57.0%.
Conclusions: In digital twins of AHRF patients, successful NIV improved lung mechanics, lowering respiratory effort and indices associated with lung injury. NIV failed in patients for whom only low levels of positive inspiratory pressure support could be applied without risking patient self-inflicted lung injury due to excessive tidal volumes.
期刊介绍:
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.