基于径向 bSSFP 和低张量约束的高空间分辨率和采集效率心脏磁共振 T1 Mapping。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1002/jmri.29564
Juan Gao, Yiwen Gong, Yixin Emu, Zhuo Chen, Haiyang Chen, Fan Yang, Zekang Ding, Sha Hua, Wei Jin, Chenxi Hu
{"title":"基于径向 bSSFP 和低张量约束的高空间分辨率和采集效率心脏磁共振 T1 Mapping。","authors":"Juan Gao, Yiwen Gong, Yixin Emu, Zhuo Chen, Haiyang Chen, Fan Yang, Zekang Ding, Sha Hua, Wei Jin, Chenxi Hu","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac T1 mapping is valuable for evaluating myocardial fibrosis, yet its resolution and acquisition efficiency are limited, potentially obscuring visualization of small pathologies.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a technique for high-resolution cardiac T1 mapping with a less-than-100-millisecond acquisition window based on radial MOdified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) and a calibrationless space-contrast-coil locally low-rank tensor (SCC-LLRT) constrained reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects/phantom: </strong>Sixteen healthy subjects (age 25 ± 3 years, 44% females) and 12 patients with suspected cardiomyopathy (age 57 ± 15 years, 42% females), NiCl2-agar phantom.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3-T, standard MOLLI, radial MOLLI, inversion-recovery spin-echo, late gadolinium enhancement.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>SCC-LLRT was compared to a conventional locally low-rank (LLR) method through simulations using Normalized Root-Mean-Square Error (NRMSE) and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM). Radial MOLLI was compared to standard MOLLI across phantom, healthy subjects, and patients. Three independent readers subjectively evaluated the quality of T1 maps using a 5-point scale (5 = best).</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient analysis, linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In simulations, SCC-LLRT demonstrated a significant improvement in NRMSE and SSIM compared to LLR. In phantom, both radial MOLLI and standard MOLLI provided consistent T1 estimates across different heart rates. In healthy subjects, radial MOLLI exhibited a significantly lower mean T1 (1115 ± 39 msec vs. 1155 ± 36 msec), similar T1 SD (74 ± 14 msec vs. 67 ± 23 msec, P = 0.20), and similar T1 reproducibility (28 ± 18 msec vs. 22 ± 15 msec, P = 0.34) compared to standard MOLLI. In patients, the proposed method significantly improved the sharpness of myocardial boundaries (4.50 ± 0.65 vs. 3.25 ± 0.43), the conspicuity of papillary muscles and fine structures (4.33 ± 0.74 vs. 3.33 ± 0.47), and artifacts (4.75 ± 0.43 vs. 3.83 ± 0.55). The reconstruction time for a single slice was 5.2 hours.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>The proposed method enables high-resolution cardiac T1 mapping with a short acquisition window and improved image quality.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High Spatial-Resolution and Acquisition-Efficiency Cardiac MR T1 Mapping Based on Radial bSSFP and a Low-Rank Tensor Constraint.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Gao, Yiwen Gong, Yixin Emu, Zhuo Chen, Haiyang Chen, Fan Yang, Zekang Ding, Sha Hua, Wei Jin, Chenxi Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jmri.29564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiac T1 mapping is valuable for evaluating myocardial fibrosis, yet its resolution and acquisition efficiency are limited, potentially obscuring visualization of small pathologies.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To develop a technique for high-resolution cardiac T1 mapping with a less-than-100-millisecond acquisition window based on radial MOdified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) and a calibrationless space-contrast-coil locally low-rank tensor (SCC-LLRT) constrained reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Subjects/phantom: </strong>Sixteen healthy subjects (age 25 ± 3 years, 44% females) and 12 patients with suspected cardiomyopathy (age 57 ± 15 years, 42% females), NiCl2-agar phantom.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3-T, standard MOLLI, radial MOLLI, inversion-recovery spin-echo, late gadolinium enhancement.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>SCC-LLRT was compared to a conventional locally low-rank (LLR) method through simulations using Normalized Root-Mean-Square Error (NRMSE) and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM). Radial MOLLI was compared to standard MOLLI across phantom, healthy subjects, and patients. Three independent readers subjectively evaluated the quality of T1 maps using a 5-point scale (5 = best).</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient analysis, linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In simulations, SCC-LLRT demonstrated a significant improvement in NRMSE and SSIM compared to LLR. In phantom, both radial MOLLI and standard MOLLI provided consistent T1 estimates across different heart rates. In healthy subjects, radial MOLLI exhibited a significantly lower mean T1 (1115 ± 39 msec vs. 1155 ± 36 msec), similar T1 SD (74 ± 14 msec vs. 67 ± 23 msec, P = 0.20), and similar T1 reproducibility (28 ± 18 msec vs. 22 ± 15 msec, P = 0.34) compared to standard MOLLI. In patients, the proposed method significantly improved the sharpness of myocardial boundaries (4.50 ± 0.65 vs. 3.25 ± 0.43), the conspicuity of papillary muscles and fine structures (4.33 ± 0.74 vs. 3.33 ± 0.47), and artifacts (4.75 ± 0.43 vs. 3.83 ± 0.55). The reconstruction time for a single slice was 5.2 hours.</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>The proposed method enables high-resolution cardiac T1 mapping with a short acquisition window and improved image quality.</p><p><strong>Evidence level: </strong>1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29564\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29564","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:开发一种基于径向MOdified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI)和无校准空间-对比度-线圈局部低阶张量(SCC-LLRT)约束重建的高分辨率心脏T1绘图技术,采集窗口小于100毫秒:受试者/模型:16 名健康受试者(年龄 25 ± 3 岁,44% 为女性)和 12 名疑似心肌病患者(年龄 57 ± 15 岁,42% 为女性),NiCl2-agar 模型:场强/序列:3-T、标准 MOLLI、径向 MOLLI、反转恢复自旋回波、晚期钆增强:通过使用归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)和结构相似性指数测量(SSIM)进行模拟,将 SCC-LLRT 与传统的局部低秩 (LLR) 方法进行了比较。径向 MOLLI 与标准 MOLLI 在模型、健康受试者和患者中进行了比较。三位独立读者采用 5 分制(5 = 最佳)对 T1 地图的质量进行主观评价:配对 t 检验、Wilcoxon 符号秩检验、类内相关系数分析、线性回归、Bland-Altman 分析。P 结果:在模拟中,与 LLR 相比,SCC-LLRT 在 NRMSE 和 SSIM 方面有显著改善。在模型中,径向 MOLLI 和标准 MOLLI 都能在不同心率下提供一致的 T1 估计值。在健康受试者中,与标准 MOLLI 相比,径向 MOLLI 的平均 T1 明显更低(1115 ± 39 毫秒 vs. 1155 ± 36 毫秒),T1 SD 相似(74 ± 14 毫秒 vs. 67 ± 23 毫秒,P = 0.20),T1 重现性相似(28 ± 18 毫秒 vs. 22 ± 15 毫秒,P = 0.34)。在患者中,建议的方法明显提高了心肌边界的清晰度(4.50 ± 0.65 vs. 3.25 ± 0.43)、乳头肌和精细结构的清晰度(4.33 ± 0.74 vs. 3.33 ± 0.47)以及伪影(4.75 ± 0.43 vs. 3.83 ± 0.55)。单张切片的重建时间为 5.2 小时:证据等级:1 技术效果:第 1 阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
High Spatial-Resolution and Acquisition-Efficiency Cardiac MR T1 Mapping Based on Radial bSSFP and a Low-Rank Tensor Constraint.

Background: Cardiac T1 mapping is valuable for evaluating myocardial fibrosis, yet its resolution and acquisition efficiency are limited, potentially obscuring visualization of small pathologies.

Purpose: To develop a technique for high-resolution cardiac T1 mapping with a less-than-100-millisecond acquisition window based on radial MOdified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (MOLLI) and a calibrationless space-contrast-coil locally low-rank tensor (SCC-LLRT) constrained reconstruction.

Study type: Prospective.

Subjects/phantom: Sixteen healthy subjects (age 25 ± 3 years, 44% females) and 12 patients with suspected cardiomyopathy (age 57 ± 15 years, 42% females), NiCl2-agar phantom.

Field strength/sequence: 3-T, standard MOLLI, radial MOLLI, inversion-recovery spin-echo, late gadolinium enhancement.

Assessment: SCC-LLRT was compared to a conventional locally low-rank (LLR) method through simulations using Normalized Root-Mean-Square Error (NRMSE) and Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM). Radial MOLLI was compared to standard MOLLI across phantom, healthy subjects, and patients. Three independent readers subjectively evaluated the quality of T1 maps using a 5-point scale (5 = best).

Statistical tests: Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, intraclass correlation coefficient analysis, linear regression, Bland-Altman analysis. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: In simulations, SCC-LLRT demonstrated a significant improvement in NRMSE and SSIM compared to LLR. In phantom, both radial MOLLI and standard MOLLI provided consistent T1 estimates across different heart rates. In healthy subjects, radial MOLLI exhibited a significantly lower mean T1 (1115 ± 39 msec vs. 1155 ± 36 msec), similar T1 SD (74 ± 14 msec vs. 67 ± 23 msec, P = 0.20), and similar T1 reproducibility (28 ± 18 msec vs. 22 ± 15 msec, P = 0.34) compared to standard MOLLI. In patients, the proposed method significantly improved the sharpness of myocardial boundaries (4.50 ± 0.65 vs. 3.25 ± 0.43), the conspicuity of papillary muscles and fine structures (4.33 ± 0.74 vs. 3.33 ± 0.47), and artifacts (4.75 ± 0.43 vs. 3.83 ± 0.55). The reconstruction time for a single slice was 5.2 hours.

Data conclusion: The proposed method enables high-resolution cardiac T1 mapping with a short acquisition window and improved image quality.

Evidence level: 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Visual Pathway White Matter Degeneration in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma Using Multiple MRI Morphology and Diffusion Metrics. Abnormal Structural-Functional Coupling and MRI Alterations of Brain Network Topology in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy. Application of Myocardial Salvage Index as a Clinical Endpoint: Assessment Methods and Future Prospects. Glymphatic System in Preterm Neonates: Developmental Insights Following Birth Asphyxia. Editorial for "Discrimination Between Benign and Malignant Lesions With Restriction Spectrum Imaging MRI in a Breast Cancer Screening Cohort".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1