从泌尿学期刊论文中自动生成社交媒体帖子的人工智能平台:一项横断面研究和随机评估

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004199
Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti, Francesco Cei, Jacob S Hershenhouse, Daniel Mokhtar, Severin Rodler, Karanvir Gill, David Strauss, Luis G Medina, Jie Cai, Andre Luis Abreu, Mihir M Desai, Rene Sotelo, Inderbir S Gill, Giovanni E Cacciamani
{"title":"从泌尿学期刊论文中自动生成社交媒体帖子的人工智能平台:一项横断面研究和随机评估","authors":"Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti, Francesco Cei, Jacob S Hershenhouse, Daniel Mokhtar, Severin Rodler, Karanvir Gill, David Strauss, Luis G Medina, Jie Cai, Andre Luis Abreu, Mihir M Desai, Rene Sotelo, Inderbir S Gill, Giovanni E Cacciamani","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed a generative artificial intelligence platform to automate the creation of accurate, appropriate, and compelling social media (SoMe) posts from urological journal articles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred SoMe posts from the top 3 journals in urology X (formerly Twitter) profiles were collected from August 2022 to October 2023. A freeware generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) tool was developed to autogenerate SoMe posts, which included title summarization, key findings, pertinent emojis, hashtags, and digital object identifier links to the article. Three physicians independently evaluated GPT-generated posts for achieving tetrafecta of accuracy and appropriateness criteria. Fifteen scenarios were created from 5 randomly selected posts from each journal. Each scenario contained both the original and the GPT-generated post for the same article. Five questions were formulated to investigate the posts' likability, shareability, engagement, understandability, and comprehensiveness. The paired posts were then randomized and presented to blinded academic authors and general public through Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) responders for preference evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median time for post autogeneration was 10.2 seconds (interquartile range 8.5-12.5). Of the 150 rated GPT-generated posts, 115 (76.6%) met the correctness tetrafecta: 144 (96%) accurately summarized the title, 147 (98%) accurately presented the articles' main findings, 131 (87.3%) appropriately used emojis, and 138 (92%) appropriately used hashtags. A total of 258 academic urologists and 493 AMT responders answered the surveys, wherein the GPT-generated posts consistently outperformed the original journals' posts for both academicians and AMT responders (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generative artificial intelligence can automate the creation of SoMe posts from urology journal abstracts that are both accurate and preferable by the academic community and general public.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"873-881"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generative Artificial Intelligence Platform for Automating Social Media Posts From Urology Journal Articles: A Cross-Sectional Study and Randomized Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Lorenzo Storino Ramacciotti, Francesco Cei, Jacob S Hershenhouse, Daniel Mokhtar, Severin Rodler, Karanvir Gill, David Strauss, Luis G Medina, Jie Cai, Andre Luis Abreu, Mihir M Desai, Rene Sotelo, Inderbir S Gill, Giovanni E Cacciamani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JU.0000000000004199\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This cross-sectional study assessed a generative artificial intelligence platform to automate the creation of accurate, appropriate, and compelling social media (SoMe) posts from urological journal articles.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred SoMe posts from the top 3 journals in urology X (formerly Twitter) profiles were collected from August 2022 to October 2023. A freeware generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) tool was developed to autogenerate SoMe posts, which included title summarization, key findings, pertinent emojis, hashtags, and digital object identifier links to the article. Three physicians independently evaluated GPT-generated posts for achieving tetrafecta of accuracy and appropriateness criteria. Fifteen scenarios were created from 5 randomly selected posts from each journal. Each scenario contained both the original and the GPT-generated post for the same article. Five questions were formulated to investigate the posts' likability, shareability, engagement, understandability, and comprehensiveness. The paired posts were then randomized and presented to blinded academic authors and general public through Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) responders for preference evaluation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median time for post autogeneration was 10.2 seconds (interquartile range 8.5-12.5). Of the 150 rated GPT-generated posts, 115 (76.6%) met the correctness tetrafecta: 144 (96%) accurately summarized the title, 147 (98%) accurately presented the articles' main findings, 131 (87.3%) appropriately used emojis, and 138 (92%) appropriately used hashtags. A total of 258 academic urologists and 493 AMT responders answered the surveys, wherein the GPT-generated posts consistently outperformed the original journals' posts for both academicians and AMT responders (<i>P</i> < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Generative artificial intelligence can automate the creation of SoMe posts from urology journal abstracts that are both accurate and preferable by the academic community and general public.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"873-881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004199\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004199","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本横断面研究评估了一个生成式人工智能平台,该平台可根据泌尿外科期刊论文自动创建准确、适当且引人注目的社交媒体(SoMe)帖子:从 2022 年 8 月到 2023 年 10 月,收集了来自泌尿学 X(Twitter)前 3 名期刊的 100 篇 SoMe 帖子。开发了一个免费 GPT 工具,用于自动生成 SoMe 帖子,其中包括标题摘要、主要发现、相关表情符号、标签和文章的 DOI 链接。三位医生对 GPT 生成的帖子进行独立评估,看其是否符合准确性和适当性的四项标准。从每份期刊中随机抽取 5 篇文章,创建了 15 个场景。每个情景都包含同一篇文章的原始帖子和 GPT 生成的帖子。我们设计了五个问题来考察文章的可喜爱性、可分享性、可参与性、可理解性和全面性。然后将配对后的文章进行随机化,并通过亚马逊机械特克(AMT)应答器向盲人学术作者和普通大众展示,以进行偏好评价:帖子自动生成的时间中位数(IQR)为 10.2 秒(8.5-12.5)。在 GPT 生成的 150 篇评分帖子中,115 篇(76.6%)符合正确性四项标准:144 篇(96%)准确概括了标题,147 篇(98%)准确介绍了文章的主要发现,131 篇(87.3%)恰当使用了表情符号和标签 138 篇(92%)。共有 258 名泌尿科学者和 493 名 AMT 答复者回答了调查,其中 GPT 生成的帖子在学者和 AMT 答复者中的表现始终优于原始期刊帖子(P < .05):生成式人工智能可以自动根据泌尿外科期刊摘要创建 SoMe 帖子,这些帖子既准确又受到学术界和公众的青睐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generative Artificial Intelligence Platform for Automating Social Media Posts From Urology Journal Articles: A Cross-Sectional Study and Randomized Assessment.

Purpose: This cross-sectional study assessed a generative artificial intelligence platform to automate the creation of accurate, appropriate, and compelling social media (SoMe) posts from urological journal articles.

Materials and methods: One hundred SoMe posts from the top 3 journals in urology X (formerly Twitter) profiles were collected from August 2022 to October 2023. A freeware generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) tool was developed to autogenerate SoMe posts, which included title summarization, key findings, pertinent emojis, hashtags, and digital object identifier links to the article. Three physicians independently evaluated GPT-generated posts for achieving tetrafecta of accuracy and appropriateness criteria. Fifteen scenarios were created from 5 randomly selected posts from each journal. Each scenario contained both the original and the GPT-generated post for the same article. Five questions were formulated to investigate the posts' likability, shareability, engagement, understandability, and comprehensiveness. The paired posts were then randomized and presented to blinded academic authors and general public through Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) responders for preference evaluation.

Results: Median time for post autogeneration was 10.2 seconds (interquartile range 8.5-12.5). Of the 150 rated GPT-generated posts, 115 (76.6%) met the correctness tetrafecta: 144 (96%) accurately summarized the title, 147 (98%) accurately presented the articles' main findings, 131 (87.3%) appropriately used emojis, and 138 (92%) appropriately used hashtags. A total of 258 academic urologists and 493 AMT responders answered the surveys, wherein the GPT-generated posts consistently outperformed the original journals' posts for both academicians and AMT responders (P < .05).

Conclusions: Generative artificial intelligence can automate the creation of SoMe posts from urology journal abstracts that are both accurate and preferable by the academic community and general public.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
期刊最新文献
Urologic Oncology: Bladder, Penis, and Urethral Cancer, and Basic Principles of Oncology. Moving the Needle in Early-Stage Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Management: The MAGESTIC Trial. The Impact of Social Deprivation on Anterior Urethral Stricture Recurrence After Urethroplasty: A Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons Analysis. Exploring the Genetic Risk of Childhood Daytime Urinary Incontinence: A Genome-Wide Association Study. Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Compliance With Utilization of a Mail-In Semen Analysis Kit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1