使用驴慢性疼痛量表客观评估驴的慢性疼痛。

IF 1.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1016/j.vaa.2024.05.011
{"title":"使用驴慢性疼痛量表客观评估驴的慢性疼痛。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.05.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To clinically evaluate previously developed pain scales [Donkey Chronic Pain Composite Pain Scale (DCP-CPS), Donkey Chronic Pain Facial Assessment of Pain (DCP-FAP) and combined Donkey Chronic Pain Scale (DCPS)], including behavioural and facial expression–based variables, for the assessment of chronic pain in donkeys.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Prospective, blinded clinical study.</p></div><div><h3>Animal</h3><p>A group of 77 donkeys (34 patients and 43 healthy control animals).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Animals were assessed by two observers that were blinded to the condition of the animals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both DCP-CPS and DCP-FAP, and resulting combined DCPS scores, showed good interobserver reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.86–0.95, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; ICC = 0.71, CI = 0.50–0.83, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 and ICC = 0.84, CI = 0.72–0.91, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively]. All scores (DCP-CPS, DCP-FAP and the resulting combined DCPS) were significantly higher for patients than for controls at all time points (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 for all three scales). Sensitivity and specificity for identification of pain (cut-off value &gt;3) was 73.0% and 65.1% for DCP-CPS, and 60.9% and 83.3% for DCP-FAP, respectively. For the combined DCPS, sensitivity was 87.0% and specificity 90.9% (cut-off value &gt;6).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><p>Based on behavioural and facial expression–based variables, DCPS proved a promising and reproducible tool to assess different types of chronic pain in donkeys. The combination of behavioural and facial expression–based variables showed the best discriminatory characteristics in the current study. Further studies are needed for refinement of these tools.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23626,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724000886/pdfft?md5=d0660664e9e44f90e3af8149d758d4f0&pid=1-s2.0-S1467298724000886-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objective assessment of chronic pain in donkeys using the Donkey Chronic Pain Scale\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.vaa.2024.05.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To clinically evaluate previously developed pain scales [Donkey Chronic Pain Composite Pain Scale (DCP-CPS), Donkey Chronic Pain Facial Assessment of Pain (DCP-FAP) and combined Donkey Chronic Pain Scale (DCPS)], including behavioural and facial expression–based variables, for the assessment of chronic pain in donkeys.</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>Prospective, blinded clinical study.</p></div><div><h3>Animal</h3><p>A group of 77 donkeys (34 patients and 43 healthy control animals).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Animals were assessed by two observers that were blinded to the condition of the animals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both DCP-CPS and DCP-FAP, and resulting combined DCPS scores, showed good interobserver reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.86–0.95, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; ICC = 0.71, CI = 0.50–0.83, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 and ICC = 0.84, CI = 0.72–0.91, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively]. All scores (DCP-CPS, DCP-FAP and the resulting combined DCPS) were significantly higher for patients than for controls at all time points (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 for all three scales). Sensitivity and specificity for identification of pain (cut-off value &gt;3) was 73.0% and 65.1% for DCP-CPS, and 60.9% and 83.3% for DCP-FAP, respectively. For the combined DCPS, sensitivity was 87.0% and specificity 90.9% (cut-off value &gt;6).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical relevance</h3><p>Based on behavioural and facial expression–based variables, DCPS proved a promising and reproducible tool to assess different types of chronic pain in donkeys. The combination of behavioural and facial expression–based variables showed the best discriminatory characteristics in the current study. Further studies are needed for refinement of these tools.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724000886/pdfft?md5=d0660664e9e44f90e3af8149d758d4f0&pid=1-s2.0-S1467298724000886-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724000886\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467298724000886","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的临床评估之前开发的用于评估驴慢性疼痛的疼痛量表[驴慢性疼痛综合疼痛量表(DCP-CPS)、驴慢性疼痛面部疼痛评估(DCP-FAP)和驴慢性疼痛综合量表(DCPS)],包括基于行为和面部表情的变量:研究设计:前瞻性、盲法临床研究:动物:77 头驴(34 头患者和 43 头健康对照组动物):动物:77 头驴(34 头患者和 43 头健康对照组动物):DCP-CPS和DCP-FAP以及由此得出的DCPS综合评分均显示出良好的观察者间可靠性[类内相关系数(ICC)= 0.91,95%置信区间(CI)= 0.86-0.95,p < 0.001;ICC = 0.71,CI = 0.50-0.83,p < 0.001和ICC = 0.84,CI = 0.72-0.91,p < 0.001]。在所有时间点,患者的所有评分(DCP-CPS、DCP-FAP 和由此得出的 DCPS 综合评分)均显著高于对照组(所有三个量表的 p 均 <0.001)。DCP-CPS 对疼痛(临界值大于 3)的敏感性和特异性分别为 73.0% 和 65.1%,DCP-FAP 为 60.9% 和 83.3%。综合 DCPS 的灵敏度为 87.0%,特异性为 90.9%(临界值大于 6):基于行为和面部表情变量,DCPS 被证明是评估驴不同类型慢性疼痛的一种有前途且可重复的工具。在目前的研究中,行为变量和面部表情变量的组合显示出最佳的鉴别特性。还需要进一步的研究来完善这些工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Objective assessment of chronic pain in donkeys using the Donkey Chronic Pain Scale

Objective

To clinically evaluate previously developed pain scales [Donkey Chronic Pain Composite Pain Scale (DCP-CPS), Donkey Chronic Pain Facial Assessment of Pain (DCP-FAP) and combined Donkey Chronic Pain Scale (DCPS)], including behavioural and facial expression–based variables, for the assessment of chronic pain in donkeys.

Study design

Prospective, blinded clinical study.

Animal

A group of 77 donkeys (34 patients and 43 healthy control animals).

Methods

Animals were assessed by two observers that were blinded to the condition of the animals.

Results

Both DCP-CPS and DCP-FAP, and resulting combined DCPS scores, showed good interobserver reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.86–0.95, p < 0.001; ICC = 0.71, CI = 0.50–0.83, p < 0.001 and ICC = 0.84, CI = 0.72–0.91, p < 0.001, respectively]. All scores (DCP-CPS, DCP-FAP and the resulting combined DCPS) were significantly higher for patients than for controls at all time points (p < 0.001 for all three scales). Sensitivity and specificity for identification of pain (cut-off value >3) was 73.0% and 65.1% for DCP-CPS, and 60.9% and 83.3% for DCP-FAP, respectively. For the combined DCPS, sensitivity was 87.0% and specificity 90.9% (cut-off value >6).

Conclusions and clinical relevance

Based on behavioural and facial expression–based variables, DCPS proved a promising and reproducible tool to assess different types of chronic pain in donkeys. The combination of behavioural and facial expression–based variables showed the best discriminatory characteristics in the current study. Further studies are needed for refinement of these tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
97 days
期刊介绍: Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia is the official journal of the Association of Veterinary Anaesthetists, the American College of Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia and the European College of Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. Its purpose is the publication of original, peer reviewed articles covering all branches of anaesthesia and the relief of pain in animals. Articles concerned with the following subjects related to anaesthesia and analgesia are also welcome: the basic sciences; pathophysiology of disease as it relates to anaesthetic management equipment intensive care chemical restraint of animals including laboratory animals, wildlife and exotic animals welfare issues associated with pain and distress education in veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia. Review articles, special articles, and historical notes will also be published, along with editorials, case reports in the form of letters to the editor, and book reviews. There is also an active correspondence section.
期刊最新文献
Opioid-free management of postoperative sternotomy-related pain by continuous transversus thoracis plane block in a dog. Rectus sheath block for perioperative analgesia during umbilical herniorrhaphy in a calf. Comparative study between lateral versus latero-ventral quadratus lumborum block for perioperative analgesia in canine laparoscopic ovariectomy. Peripheral warming for prevention of hypothermia in small dogs during soft tissue surgery: A randomized controlled trial. Pharmacokinetics of methadone after intravenous and subcutaneous administration in domestic ferrets (Mustela putorius furo).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1