[正念的临床意义:匈牙利版五面正念问卷简表(FFMQ-SF-15)]。

Q4 Medicine Psychiatria Hungarica Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Tamás Szekeres, Liza Takács, Szilvia Kresznerits, Emese Misák, Ágnes Zinner-Gérecz, Dóra Perczel-Forintos
{"title":"[正念的临床意义:匈牙利版五面正念问卷简表(FFMQ-SF-15)]。","authors":"Tamás Szekeres, Liza Takács, Szilvia Kresznerits, Emese Misák, Ágnes Zinner-Gérecz, Dóra Perczel-Forintos","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mindfulness based interventions belongs to the third wave of cognitive behavioural therapies, where the focus is shifted from restructuring negative automatic thoughts and dysfunctional attitudes to the awareness and acceptance of mental events. The effectiveness of mindfulness based interventions also encouraged researchers to explore more precisely the mechanism of mindfulness. One of the most common measuring instruments is the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). In recent years, several versions of the questionnaire have been developed, but so far no Hungarian sample has yet been used to assess which version is the most suitable for clinical and research use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hungarian adaptation and internal / external validity testing of the short version of FFMQ.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In our cross-sectional, non-randomized study, we included 1413 patients from the psychotherapy outpatient clinic of our institution between 2018 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the original 39 items, the 15-item version of the FFMQ has better validity indicators. Based on the confirmatory factor analysis, the five-factor model shows an excellent fit. The internal and external reliability of the five-factor structure proved to be better, than the one-factor model. The correlation coefficients also are indicating, that the direction and strength of the relationship are equivalent for the examined variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FFMQ-SF-15 version is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring mindfulness in a clinical sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":35063,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatria Hungarica","volume":"39 2","pages":"113-127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The clinical significance of mindfulness: Hungarian adaptation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Form (FFMQ-SF-15)].\",\"authors\":\"Tamás Szekeres, Liza Takács, Szilvia Kresznerits, Emese Misák, Ágnes Zinner-Gérecz, Dóra Perczel-Forintos\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mindfulness based interventions belongs to the third wave of cognitive behavioural therapies, where the focus is shifted from restructuring negative automatic thoughts and dysfunctional attitudes to the awareness and acceptance of mental events. The effectiveness of mindfulness based interventions also encouraged researchers to explore more precisely the mechanism of mindfulness. One of the most common measuring instruments is the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). In recent years, several versions of the questionnaire have been developed, but so far no Hungarian sample has yet been used to assess which version is the most suitable for clinical and research use.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Hungarian adaptation and internal / external validity testing of the short version of FFMQ.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In our cross-sectional, non-randomized study, we included 1413 patients from the psychotherapy outpatient clinic of our institution between 2018 and 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to the original 39 items, the 15-item version of the FFMQ has better validity indicators. Based on the confirmatory factor analysis, the five-factor model shows an excellent fit. The internal and external reliability of the five-factor structure proved to be better, than the one-factor model. The correlation coefficients also are indicating, that the direction and strength of the relationship are equivalent for the examined variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The FFMQ-SF-15 version is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring mindfulness in a clinical sample.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychiatria Hungarica\",\"volume\":\"39 2\",\"pages\":\"113-127\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychiatria Hungarica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatria Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介正念干预属于认知行为疗法的第三次浪潮,其重点从调整消极的自动想法和功能失调的态度转向对心理事件的认知和接受。正念干预的有效性也鼓励研究人员更精确地探索正念的机制。最常见的测量工具之一是五面正念问卷(FFMQ)。近年来,该问卷已开发出多个版本,但迄今为止,尚未使用匈牙利样本来评估哪个版本最适合临床和研究使用:在横断面、非随机研究中,我们纳入了2018年至2022年间本机构心理治疗门诊的1413名患者:与原有的39个条目相比,15条目版FFMQ具有更好的效度指标。基于确认性因子分析,五因子模型显示出良好的拟合度。事实证明,五因素结构的内部和外部信度均优于单因素模型。相关系数也表明,所研究变量的关系方向和强度是相同的:FFMQ-SF-15版本是一种可靠有效的工具,可用于测量临床样本中的正念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The clinical significance of mindfulness: Hungarian adaptation of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Short Form (FFMQ-SF-15)].

Introduction: Mindfulness based interventions belongs to the third wave of cognitive behavioural therapies, where the focus is shifted from restructuring negative automatic thoughts and dysfunctional attitudes to the awareness and acceptance of mental events. The effectiveness of mindfulness based interventions also encouraged researchers to explore more precisely the mechanism of mindfulness. One of the most common measuring instruments is the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ). In recent years, several versions of the questionnaire have been developed, but so far no Hungarian sample has yet been used to assess which version is the most suitable for clinical and research use.

Objective: Hungarian adaptation and internal / external validity testing of the short version of FFMQ.

Method: In our cross-sectional, non-randomized study, we included 1413 patients from the psychotherapy outpatient clinic of our institution between 2018 and 2022.

Results: Compared to the original 39 items, the 15-item version of the FFMQ has better validity indicators. Based on the confirmatory factor analysis, the five-factor model shows an excellent fit. The internal and external reliability of the five-factor structure proved to be better, than the one-factor model. The correlation coefficients also are indicating, that the direction and strength of the relationship are equivalent for the examined variables.

Conclusions: The FFMQ-SF-15 version is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring mindfulness in a clinical sample.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychiatria Hungarica
Psychiatria Hungarica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Challenges and resolutions in mental health support for medical students. Mental Health Counseling Service at Semmelweis University]. [Csontvary, a Hungarian Painter, Art, Psychiatry. The Analysis according to Rennert]. [Depressed reality]. [Recent studies about the underlying cerebral mechanism of the fearfull arousals from slow wave sleep]. [The role of artificial intelligence in psychiatry].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1