我们是否应该在室内使用吊扇来降低传染性气溶胶的传播风险?

Jiayu Li , Sultan Zuraimi , Stefano Schiavon
{"title":"我们是否应该在室内使用吊扇来降低传染性气溶胶的传播风险?","authors":"Jiayu Li ,&nbsp;Sultan Zuraimi ,&nbsp;Stefano Schiavon","doi":"10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The effects of ceiling fans on the transmission of infectious aerosols remain poorly understood, leading to conflicting recommendations. We conducted repeated experiments in a well-controlled chamber with a typical mixing ventilation system at three different ventilation rates with and without ceiling fans. We evaluated airborne infection risks for short- and long-range transmission routes based on size-resolved tracer particles measured at various locations. We found that the mixing ventilation without fans only effectively diluted the airborne particle concentration for the long-range route but not for the short-range. By using ceiling fans to enhance air mixing, tracer particles were distributed more homogeneously throughout the room, leading to up to 77 % reduction in short-range particle exposure while a slight increase of less than 14 % in long-range exposure. Based on the dilution-based Wells-Riley model, the changes in particle concentration translated to a maximum 47 % reduction in short-range infection risk and a marginal 4 % increase for long-range transmission. Based on the dilution factors obtained from the experiments, we developed a decision-making tool that uses the ventilation rate, the number of individuals at short- and long-range, and the disease's transmissibility to decide whether the use of ceiling fans is beneficial. Deploying ceiling fans always reduces the concentration of particles in the short range and, assuming a relationship between particles and pathogens, this directly translates to a diminished short-range risk. Based on the modeling of the overall risk, the benefits of fans are highest when the room is ventilated according to code, when masking measures are in place, and when the pathogen is not highly contagious.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100665,"journal":{"name":"Indoor Environments","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100039"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000365/pdfft?md5=bf9a0f847e5d5f1512747b400bbe2081&pid=1-s2.0-S2950362024000365-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Should we use ceiling fans indoors to reduce the risk of transmission of infectious aerosols?\",\"authors\":\"Jiayu Li ,&nbsp;Sultan Zuraimi ,&nbsp;Stefano Schiavon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.indenv.2024.100039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The effects of ceiling fans on the transmission of infectious aerosols remain poorly understood, leading to conflicting recommendations. We conducted repeated experiments in a well-controlled chamber with a typical mixing ventilation system at three different ventilation rates with and without ceiling fans. We evaluated airborne infection risks for short- and long-range transmission routes based on size-resolved tracer particles measured at various locations. We found that the mixing ventilation without fans only effectively diluted the airborne particle concentration for the long-range route but not for the short-range. By using ceiling fans to enhance air mixing, tracer particles were distributed more homogeneously throughout the room, leading to up to 77 % reduction in short-range particle exposure while a slight increase of less than 14 % in long-range exposure. Based on the dilution-based Wells-Riley model, the changes in particle concentration translated to a maximum 47 % reduction in short-range infection risk and a marginal 4 % increase for long-range transmission. Based on the dilution factors obtained from the experiments, we developed a decision-making tool that uses the ventilation rate, the number of individuals at short- and long-range, and the disease's transmissibility to decide whether the use of ceiling fans is beneficial. Deploying ceiling fans always reduces the concentration of particles in the short range and, assuming a relationship between particles and pathogens, this directly translates to a diminished short-range risk. Based on the modeling of the overall risk, the benefits of fans are highest when the room is ventilated according to code, when masking measures are in place, and when the pathogen is not highly contagious.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indoor Environments\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000365/pdfft?md5=bf9a0f847e5d5f1512747b400bbe2081&pid=1-s2.0-S2950362024000365-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indoor Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indoor Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950362024000365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人们对吊扇对传染性气溶胶传播的影响仍然知之甚少,因此提出了一些相互矛盾的建议。我们在一个具有典型混合通风系统的控制良好的密室中,以三种不同的通风率(有吊扇和无吊扇)进行了重复实验。我们根据在不同位置测量到的尺寸分辨示踪粒子,评估了短程和远程传播途径的空气传播感染风险。我们发现,不带风扇的混合通风系统只能有效稀释远距离传播途径的空气中的颗粒浓度,而不能有效稀释近距离传播途径的空气中的颗粒浓度。通过使用吊扇加强空气混合,示踪粒子在整个房间内的分布更加均匀,从而使短程粒子暴露量减少了 77%,而长程暴露量则略有增加,增幅不到 14%。根据基于稀释的 Wells-Riley 模型,粒子浓度的变化导致短程感染风险最多降低 47%,而长程传播风险仅增加 4%。根据实验得出的稀释因子,我们开发了一种决策工具,利用通风率、短距离和长距离的人数以及疾病的传播性来决定使用吊扇是否有益。安装吊扇总是会降低短距离内的微粒浓度,假设微粒和病原体之间存在某种关系,这直接转化为短距离风险的降低。根据整体风险建模,当房间通风符合规范、采取了遮蔽措施、病原体传染性不强时,风扇的益处最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Should we use ceiling fans indoors to reduce the risk of transmission of infectious aerosols?

The effects of ceiling fans on the transmission of infectious aerosols remain poorly understood, leading to conflicting recommendations. We conducted repeated experiments in a well-controlled chamber with a typical mixing ventilation system at three different ventilation rates with and without ceiling fans. We evaluated airborne infection risks for short- and long-range transmission routes based on size-resolved tracer particles measured at various locations. We found that the mixing ventilation without fans only effectively diluted the airborne particle concentration for the long-range route but not for the short-range. By using ceiling fans to enhance air mixing, tracer particles were distributed more homogeneously throughout the room, leading to up to 77 % reduction in short-range particle exposure while a slight increase of less than 14 % in long-range exposure. Based on the dilution-based Wells-Riley model, the changes in particle concentration translated to a maximum 47 % reduction in short-range infection risk and a marginal 4 % increase for long-range transmission. Based on the dilution factors obtained from the experiments, we developed a decision-making tool that uses the ventilation rate, the number of individuals at short- and long-range, and the disease's transmissibility to decide whether the use of ceiling fans is beneficial. Deploying ceiling fans always reduces the concentration of particles in the short range and, assuming a relationship between particles and pathogens, this directly translates to a diminished short-range risk. Based on the modeling of the overall risk, the benefits of fans are highest when the room is ventilated according to code, when masking measures are in place, and when the pathogen is not highly contagious.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum to “Ventilation characteristics in a hospital where a COVID-19 outbreak occurred in the winter of 2020” [Indoor Environ. 2 (2025) 100065] Implementing Bayesian inference on a stochastic CO2-based grey-box model CO2 levels and SARS-CoV-2 transmission in public schools: A retrospective cohort study in Montreal (Canada) Cognition, economic decision-making, and physiological response to carbon dioxide Personal air cleaning by a user-tracking robot equipped with a nanofiber air cleaner in a large work space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1