巴西造林试验中 100 种热带树种的直径生长模型和表现

IF 3.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecology and Management Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122202
{"title":"巴西造林试验中 100 种热带树种的直径生长模型和表现","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Projects of reforestation for sustainable production of tropical timber and for nature-based solutions must be based on reliable growth models. However, there is still a big gap in knowledge about the growth in diameter for native and exotic tropical timber species. Here, we used diameter growth data from 100 tropical tree species in silvicultural experiments established from the late 1970s to the early 1990s in the Vale Natural Reserve in the north of Espírito Santo state, Brazil. Plantations were periodically measured, usually over 20–30 years, which allowed us to produce growth models for all species and recommend those that can help boost silviculture in Brazil. We also used the data to test a large set of tree species against the same set of models, to assess model’s performance. Among 71 native species studied, 31 % showed slow growth (MAI &lt; 0.70 cm/yr), 40 % medium growth (0.70≤ MAI &lt; 0.97 cm/yr) and 29 % high growth (MAI ≥ 0.97 cm/yr), while 47 % of the 29 exotic species showed high growth rates. Based on our analysis, we recommend the use of Korf, Levakovik II, Hossfeld IV, and Levakovic III models for growth studies, because they showed a better fit for most species or because they were plausible competitor models. Even though many species have shown a great performance for silvicultural projects, more experimental trials must be established in different site and management conditions, to fully explore the silvicultural potential of these tropical timber species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12350,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecology and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diameter growth models and performance of 100 tropical tree species in silvicultural trials in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Projects of reforestation for sustainable production of tropical timber and for nature-based solutions must be based on reliable growth models. However, there is still a big gap in knowledge about the growth in diameter for native and exotic tropical timber species. Here, we used diameter growth data from 100 tropical tree species in silvicultural experiments established from the late 1970s to the early 1990s in the Vale Natural Reserve in the north of Espírito Santo state, Brazil. Plantations were periodically measured, usually over 20–30 years, which allowed us to produce growth models for all species and recommend those that can help boost silviculture in Brazil. We also used the data to test a large set of tree species against the same set of models, to assess model’s performance. Among 71 native species studied, 31 % showed slow growth (MAI &lt; 0.70 cm/yr), 40 % medium growth (0.70≤ MAI &lt; 0.97 cm/yr) and 29 % high growth (MAI ≥ 0.97 cm/yr), while 47 % of the 29 exotic species showed high growth rates. Based on our analysis, we recommend the use of Korf, Levakovik II, Hossfeld IV, and Levakovic III models for growth studies, because they showed a better fit for most species or because they were plausible competitor models. Even though many species have shown a great performance for silvicultural projects, more experimental trials must be established in different site and management conditions, to fully explore the silvicultural potential of these tropical timber species.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest Ecology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724005140\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378112724005140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为实现热带木材的可持续生产和基于自然的解决方案而开展的重新造林项目必须以可靠的生长模型为基础。然而,关于本地和外来热带木材树种的直径生长知识仍有很大差距。在这里,我们使用了上世纪 70 年代末到 90 年代初在巴西圣埃斯皮里图州北部谷地自然保护区进行的造林试验中 100 种热带树种的直径生长数据。我们定期对植树造林进行测量,通常测量 20-30 年,这样我们就能为所有树种建立生长模型,并推荐有助于促进巴西造林的树种。我们还利用这些数据用同一套模型测试了大量树种,以评估模型的性能。在所研究的 71 个本地树种中,31% 的树种生长缓慢(MAI < 0.70 厘米/年),40% 的树种生长中等(0.70≤ MAI < 0.97 厘米/年),29% 的树种生长迅速(MAI ≥ 0.97 厘米/年),而在 29 个外来树种中,47% 的树种生长迅速。根据我们的分析,我们建议在生长研究中使用 Korf、Levakovik II、Hossfeld IV 和 Levakovic III 模型,因为它们对大多数物种的拟合效果更好,或者它们是可信的竞争者模型。尽管许多树种在造林项目中表现出色,但必须在不同的地点和管理条件下进行更多的试验,以充分发掘这些热带木材树种的造林潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diameter growth models and performance of 100 tropical tree species in silvicultural trials in Brazil

Projects of reforestation for sustainable production of tropical timber and for nature-based solutions must be based on reliable growth models. However, there is still a big gap in knowledge about the growth in diameter for native and exotic tropical timber species. Here, we used diameter growth data from 100 tropical tree species in silvicultural experiments established from the late 1970s to the early 1990s in the Vale Natural Reserve in the north of Espírito Santo state, Brazil. Plantations were periodically measured, usually over 20–30 years, which allowed us to produce growth models for all species and recommend those that can help boost silviculture in Brazil. We also used the data to test a large set of tree species against the same set of models, to assess model’s performance. Among 71 native species studied, 31 % showed slow growth (MAI < 0.70 cm/yr), 40 % medium growth (0.70≤ MAI < 0.97 cm/yr) and 29 % high growth (MAI ≥ 0.97 cm/yr), while 47 % of the 29 exotic species showed high growth rates. Based on our analysis, we recommend the use of Korf, Levakovik II, Hossfeld IV, and Levakovic III models for growth studies, because they showed a better fit for most species or because they were plausible competitor models. Even though many species have shown a great performance for silvicultural projects, more experimental trials must be established in different site and management conditions, to fully explore the silvicultural potential of these tropical timber species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Management 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
10.80%
发文量
665
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecology and Management publishes scientific articles linking forest ecology with forest management, focusing on the application of biological, ecological and social knowledge to the management and conservation of plantations and natural forests. The scope of the journal includes all forest ecosystems of the world. A peer-review process ensures the quality and international interest of the manuscripts accepted for publication. The journal encourages communication between scientists in disparate fields who share a common interest in ecology and forest management, bridging the gap between research workers and forest managers. We encourage submission of papers that will have the strongest interest and value to the Journal''s international readership. Some key features of papers with strong interest include: 1. Clear connections between the ecology and management of forests; 2. Novel ideas or approaches to important challenges in forest ecology and management; 3. Studies that address a population of interest beyond the scale of single research sites, Three key points in the design of forest experiments, Forest Ecology and Management 255 (2008) 2022-2023); 4. Review Articles on timely, important topics. Authors are welcome to contact one of the editors to discuss the suitability of a potential review manuscript. The Journal encourages proposals for special issues examining important areas of forest ecology and management. Potential guest editors should contact any of the Editors to begin discussions about topics, potential papers, and other details.
期刊最新文献
Post-fire management and biocrust development interact in mid-term soil recovery after a wildfire Landscape forest cover and local vegetation structure mediate multitrophic relationships but not the leaf damage in cacao trees Legacy of traditional forest management: The impact of historical charcoal burning on soil biodiversity after centuries Spatial patterns of damage and tree mortality in a selectively logged Atlantic Forest Disentangling the contributions of ecological conditions to biomass in longleaf pine forests
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1