脑-胎盘-子宫比率在预测妊娠高血压患者围产期综合不良结局中的作用

{"title":"脑-胎盘-子宫比率在预测妊娠高血压患者围产期综合不良结局中的作用","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine the role of the cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR) in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPO) in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This prospective, case-control study was conducted at a tertiary hospital with 110 cases of PIH, including 70 patients with preeclampsia and 40 with gestational hypertension, and 110 healthy controls. The middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) were measured, and the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR=MCA-PI/UA-PI) and CPUR (CPR/UtA-PI) were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measure</h3><p>The role of CPUR in predicting CAPO in preeclampsia and gestational hypertension.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CPR and CPUR values were lower in the PIH group compared to the control group (p &lt; 0.001). CAPO had a negative correlation with CPR and CPUR (p &lt; 0.001). Univariate regression analysis revealed that the likelihood of CAPO was increased four times by a low CPR value and six times by a low CPUR value. In the ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value of CPR in predicting CAPO was 1.33 with 74 % sensitivity and 66 % specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.778; p &lt; 0.001) in PIH. For CPUR, the optimal cut-off value was 1.32, at which 82 % sensitivity and 79 % specificity in predicting CAPO (AUC=0.826; p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CPUR was determined to be successful with high sensitivity in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in the presence of PIH. In addition, CPUR was more effective in predicting CAPO in patients with preeclampsia compared to gestational hypertension. CPUR can be used to predict adverse outcomes in patients with PIH.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48697,"journal":{"name":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of the cerebro-placental-uterine ratio in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.preghy.2024.101148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To examine the role of the cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR) in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPO) in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH).</p></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><p>This prospective, case-control study was conducted at a tertiary hospital with 110 cases of PIH, including 70 patients with preeclampsia and 40 with gestational hypertension, and 110 healthy controls. The middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) were measured, and the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR=MCA-PI/UA-PI) and CPUR (CPR/UtA-PI) were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measure</h3><p>The role of CPUR in predicting CAPO in preeclampsia and gestational hypertension.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The CPR and CPUR values were lower in the PIH group compared to the control group (p &lt; 0.001). CAPO had a negative correlation with CPR and CPUR (p &lt; 0.001). Univariate regression analysis revealed that the likelihood of CAPO was increased four times by a low CPR value and six times by a low CPUR value. In the ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value of CPR in predicting CAPO was 1.33 with 74 % sensitivity and 66 % specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.778; p &lt; 0.001) in PIH. For CPUR, the optimal cut-off value was 1.32, at which 82 % sensitivity and 79 % specificity in predicting CAPO (AUC=0.826; p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>CPUR was determined to be successful with high sensitivity in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in the presence of PIH. In addition, CPUR was more effective in predicting CAPO in patients with preeclampsia compared to gestational hypertension. CPUR can be used to predict adverse outcomes in patients with PIH.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48697,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210778924001752\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210778924001752","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计这项前瞻性病例对照研究在一家三甲医院进行,共收治了110例妊娠诱发高血压(PIH)患者,包括70例子痫前期患者和40例妊娠高血压患者,以及110例健康对照者。研究人员测量了大脑中动脉搏动指数(MCA-PI)、脐动脉搏动指数(UA-PI)和子宫动脉搏动指数(UtA-PI),并计算了脑-胎盘比值(CPR=MCA-PI/UA-PI)和 CPUR(CPR/UtA-PI)。结果与对照组相比,PIH 组的 CPR 和 CPUR 值较低 (p <0.001)。CAPO 与 CPR 和 CPUR 呈负相关(p < 0.001)。单变量回归分析表明,CPR 值越低,发生 CAPO 的可能性就会增加四倍,CPUR 值越低,发生 CAPO 的可能性就会增加六倍。在 ROC 分析中,CPR 预测 CAPO 的最佳临界值为 1.33,在 PIH 中具有 74% 的灵敏度和 66% 的特异性(曲线下面积 [AUC] = 0.778; p < 0.001)。CPUR 的最佳临界值为 1.32,其预测 CAPO 的灵敏度为 82%,特异度为 79%(AUC=0.826;p <;0.001)。此外,与妊娠高血压相比,CPUR 在预测子痫前期患者的 CAPO 方面更为有效。CPUR 可用于预测 PIH 患者的不良预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of the cerebro-placental-uterine ratio in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension

Objectives

To examine the role of the cerebro-placental-uterine ratio (CPUR) in predicting composite adverse perinatal outcomes (CAPO) in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH).

Study design

This prospective, case-control study was conducted at a tertiary hospital with 110 cases of PIH, including 70 patients with preeclampsia and 40 with gestational hypertension, and 110 healthy controls. The middle cerebral artery pulsatility index (MCA-PI), umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), and uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) were measured, and the cerebro-placental ratio (CPR=MCA-PI/UA-PI) and CPUR (CPR/UtA-PI) were calculated.

Main outcome measure

The role of CPUR in predicting CAPO in preeclampsia and gestational hypertension.

Results

The CPR and CPUR values were lower in the PIH group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). CAPO had a negative correlation with CPR and CPUR (p < 0.001). Univariate regression analysis revealed that the likelihood of CAPO was increased four times by a low CPR value and six times by a low CPUR value. In the ROC analysis, the optimal cut-off value of CPR in predicting CAPO was 1.33 with 74 % sensitivity and 66 % specificity (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.778; p < 0.001) in PIH. For CPUR, the optimal cut-off value was 1.32, at which 82 % sensitivity and 79 % specificity in predicting CAPO (AUC=0.826; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

CPUR was determined to be successful with high sensitivity in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in the presence of PIH. In addition, CPUR was more effective in predicting CAPO in patients with preeclampsia compared to gestational hypertension. CPUR can be used to predict adverse outcomes in patients with PIH.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health
Pregnancy Hypertension-An International Journal of Womens Cardiovascular Health OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGYPERIPHERAL VASCULAR-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Pregnancy Hypertension: An International Journal of Women''s Cardiovascular Health aims to stimulate research in the field of hypertension in pregnancy, disseminate the useful results of such research, and advance education in the field. We publish articles pertaining to human and animal blood pressure during gestation, hypertension during gestation including physiology of circulatory control, pathophysiology, methodology, therapy or any other material relevant to the relationship between elevated blood pressure and pregnancy. The subtitle reflects the wider aspects of studying hypertension in pregnancy thus we also publish articles on in utero programming, nutrition, long term effects of hypertension in pregnancy on cardiovascular health and other research that helps our understanding of the etiology or consequences of hypertension in pregnancy. Case reports are not published unless of exceptional/outstanding importance to the field.
期刊最新文献
Response to Letter to the Editor: Comment on Article: Aspirin resistance in pregnancy is associated with reduced interleukin-2 concentration in maternal serum Hyperaldosteronism secondary to renal agenesis: An unusual cause for hypertension in pregnancy Clinical maternal risk parameters for the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications during preeclampsia in Congolese women Determining the relationship between severity of proteinuria and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with preeclampsia Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1