{"title":"人类骨骼肌的运动特异性适应:使肌肉强健有力的分子机制。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The mechanisms leading to a predominantly hypertrophied phenotype versus a predominantly oxidative phenotype, the hallmarks of resistance training (RT) or aerobic training (AT), respectively, are being unraveled. In humans, exposure of naïve persons to either AT or RT results in their skeletal muscle exhibiting generic ‘exercise stress-related’ signaling, transcription, and translation responses. However, with increasing engagement in AT or RT, the responses become refined, and the phenotype typically associated with each form of exercise emerges. Here, we review some of the mechanisms underpinning the adaptations of how muscles become, through AT, ‘fit’ and RT, ‘mighty.’ Much of our understanding of molecular exercise physiology has arisen from targeted analysis of post-translational modifications and measures of protein synthesis. Phosphorylation of specific residue sites has been a dominant focus, with canonical signaling pathways (AMPK and mTOR) studied extensively in the context of AT and RT, respectively. These alone, along with protein synthesis, have only begun to elucidate key differences in AT and RT signaling. Still, key yet uncharacterized differences exist in signaling and regulation of protein synthesis that drive unique adaptation to AT and RT. Omic studies are required to better understand the divergent relationship between exercise and phenotypic outcomes of training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12407,"journal":{"name":"Free Radical Biology and Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891584924006002/pdfft?md5=4df0d4bacf2acdb7e8c8d0232d2e0a8d&pid=1-s2.0-S0891584924006002-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise-specific adaptations in human skeletal muscle: Molecular mechanisms of making muscles fit and mighty\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2024.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The mechanisms leading to a predominantly hypertrophied phenotype versus a predominantly oxidative phenotype, the hallmarks of resistance training (RT) or aerobic training (AT), respectively, are being unraveled. In humans, exposure of naïve persons to either AT or RT results in their skeletal muscle exhibiting generic ‘exercise stress-related’ signaling, transcription, and translation responses. However, with increasing engagement in AT or RT, the responses become refined, and the phenotype typically associated with each form of exercise emerges. Here, we review some of the mechanisms underpinning the adaptations of how muscles become, through AT, ‘fit’ and RT, ‘mighty.’ Much of our understanding of molecular exercise physiology has arisen from targeted analysis of post-translational modifications and measures of protein synthesis. Phosphorylation of specific residue sites has been a dominant focus, with canonical signaling pathways (AMPK and mTOR) studied extensively in the context of AT and RT, respectively. These alone, along with protein synthesis, have only begun to elucidate key differences in AT and RT signaling. Still, key yet uncharacterized differences exist in signaling and regulation of protein synthesis that drive unique adaptation to AT and RT. Omic studies are required to better understand the divergent relationship between exercise and phenotypic outcomes of training.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Free Radical Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891584924006002/pdfft?md5=4df0d4bacf2acdb7e8c8d0232d2e0a8d&pid=1-s2.0-S0891584924006002-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Free Radical Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891584924006002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Free Radical Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891584924006002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
阻力训练(RT)或有氧训练(AT)的特点分别是以肥大表型为主和以氧化表型为主,导致这两种表型的机制正在被揭开。在人体中,将新手暴露于 AT 或 RT 会导致其骨骼肌表现出一般的 "运动应激相关 "信号、转录和翻译反应。然而,随着参与 AT 或 RT 运动的增加,这些反应会变得更加精细,并出现与每种运动形式相关的典型表型。在此,我们回顾了肌肉如何通过 AT 变得 "健壮 "和 RT 变得 "强壮 "的适应性机制。我们对分子运动生理学的理解大多来自于对蛋白质翻译后修饰的定向分析和蛋白质合成的测量。特定残基位点的磷酸化一直是研究的重点,在 AT 和 RT 的背景下分别对典型信号通路(AMPK 和 mTOR)进行了广泛研究。单凭这些研究以及蛋白质合成研究,我们才刚刚开始阐明 AT 和 RT 信号传导的关键差异。尽管如此,在信号传导和蛋白质合成调控方面仍存在尚未定性的关键差异,这些差异推动了对 AT 和 RT 的独特适应。要更好地了解运动与训练表型结果之间的不同关系,还需要进行 Omic 研究。
Exercise-specific adaptations in human skeletal muscle: Molecular mechanisms of making muscles fit and mighty
The mechanisms leading to a predominantly hypertrophied phenotype versus a predominantly oxidative phenotype, the hallmarks of resistance training (RT) or aerobic training (AT), respectively, are being unraveled. In humans, exposure of naïve persons to either AT or RT results in their skeletal muscle exhibiting generic ‘exercise stress-related’ signaling, transcription, and translation responses. However, with increasing engagement in AT or RT, the responses become refined, and the phenotype typically associated with each form of exercise emerges. Here, we review some of the mechanisms underpinning the adaptations of how muscles become, through AT, ‘fit’ and RT, ‘mighty.’ Much of our understanding of molecular exercise physiology has arisen from targeted analysis of post-translational modifications and measures of protein synthesis. Phosphorylation of specific residue sites has been a dominant focus, with canonical signaling pathways (AMPK and mTOR) studied extensively in the context of AT and RT, respectively. These alone, along with protein synthesis, have only begun to elucidate key differences in AT and RT signaling. Still, key yet uncharacterized differences exist in signaling and regulation of protein synthesis that drive unique adaptation to AT and RT. Omic studies are required to better understand the divergent relationship between exercise and phenotypic outcomes of training.
期刊介绍:
Free Radical Biology and Medicine is a leading journal in the field of redox biology, which is the study of the role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and other oxidizing agents in biological systems. The journal serves as a premier forum for publishing innovative and groundbreaking research that explores the redox biology of health and disease, covering a wide range of topics and disciplines. Free Radical Biology and Medicine also commissions Special Issues that highlight recent advances in both basic and clinical research, with a particular emphasis on the mechanisms underlying altered metabolism and redox signaling. These Special Issues aim to provide a focused platform for the latest research in the field, fostering collaboration and knowledge exchange among researchers and clinicians.