关于腹主动脉瘤管理争议问题的国际专家德尔菲共识文件。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.012
Kosmas I Paraskevas, Marc L Schermerhorn, Stephan Haulon, Adam W Beck, Hence J M Verhagen, Jason T Lee, Eric L G Verhoeven, Jan D Blankensteijn, Tilo Kölbel, Sean P Lyden, Daniel G Clair, Gianluca Faggioli, Theodosios Bisdas, Mario D'Oria, Kevin Mani, Karl Sörelius, Enrico Gallitto, Jose Fernandes E Fernandes, Athanasios Katsargyris, Sandro Lepidi, Andrea Vacirca, Piotr Myrcha, Mark J W Koelemay, Armando Mansilha, Clark J Zeebregts, Rodolfo Pini, Nuno V Dias, Angelos Karelis, Michel J Bosiers, David H Stone, Maarit Venermo, Mark A Farber, Matthew Blecha, Germano Melissano, Vincent Riambau, Matthew J Eagleton, Mauro Gargiulo, Salvatore T Scali, Giovanni B Torsello, Mark K Eskandari, Bruce A Perler, Peter Gloviczki, Mahmoud Malas, Ronald L Dalman
{"title":"关于腹主动脉瘤管理争议问题的国际专家德尔菲共识文件。","authors":"Kosmas I Paraskevas, Marc L Schermerhorn, Stephan Haulon, Adam W Beck, Hence J M Verhagen, Jason T Lee, Eric L G Verhoeven, Jan D Blankensteijn, Tilo Kölbel, Sean P Lyden, Daniel G Clair, Gianluca Faggioli, Theodosios Bisdas, Mario D'Oria, Kevin Mani, Karl Sörelius, Enrico Gallitto, Jose Fernandes E Fernandes, Athanasios Katsargyris, Sandro Lepidi, Andrea Vacirca, Piotr Myrcha, Mark J W Koelemay, Armando Mansilha, Clark J Zeebregts, Rodolfo Pini, Nuno V Dias, Angelos Karelis, Michel J Bosiers, David H Stone, Maarit Venermo, Mark A Farber, Matthew Blecha, Germano Melissano, Vincent Riambau, Matthew J Eagleton, Mauro Gargiulo, Salvatore T Scali, Giovanni B Torsello, Mark K Eskandari, Bruce A Perler, Peter Gloviczki, Mahmoud Malas, Ronald L Dalman","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As a result of conflicting, inadequate or controversial data in the literature, several issues concerning the management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain unanswered. The aim of this international, expert-based Delphi consensus document was to provide some guidance for clinicians on these controversial topics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi consensus document was produced with 44 experts on 6 prespecified topics regarding the management of AAAs. All answers were provided anonymously. The response rate for each round was 100%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (42 of 44 [95.4%]) agreed that a minimum case volume per year is essential (or probably essential) for a center to offer open or endovascular AAA repair (EVAR). Furthermore, 33 of 44 (75.0%) believed that AAA screening programs are (probably) still clinically effective and cost effective. Additionally, most panelists (36 of 44 [81.9%]) voted that surveillance after EVAR should be (or should probably be) lifelong. Finally, 35 of 44 participants (79.7%) thought that women smokers should (or should probably/possibly) be considered for screening at 65 years of age, similar to men. No consensus was achieved regarding lowering the threshold for AAA repair and the need for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing EVAR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This expert-based Delphi consensus document provides guidance for clinicians regarding specific unresolved issues. Consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting the need for further research in those areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"483-492.e2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An international, expert-based, Delphi consensus document on controversial issues in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms.\",\"authors\":\"Kosmas I Paraskevas, Marc L Schermerhorn, Stephan Haulon, Adam W Beck, Hence J M Verhagen, Jason T Lee, Eric L G Verhoeven, Jan D Blankensteijn, Tilo Kölbel, Sean P Lyden, Daniel G Clair, Gianluca Faggioli, Theodosios Bisdas, Mario D'Oria, Kevin Mani, Karl Sörelius, Enrico Gallitto, Jose Fernandes E Fernandes, Athanasios Katsargyris, Sandro Lepidi, Andrea Vacirca, Piotr Myrcha, Mark J W Koelemay, Armando Mansilha, Clark J Zeebregts, Rodolfo Pini, Nuno V Dias, Angelos Karelis, Michel J Bosiers, David H Stone, Maarit Venermo, Mark A Farber, Matthew Blecha, Germano Melissano, Vincent Riambau, Matthew J Eagleton, Mauro Gargiulo, Salvatore T Scali, Giovanni B Torsello, Mark K Eskandari, Bruce A Perler, Peter Gloviczki, Mahmoud Malas, Ronald L Dalman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>As a result of conflicting, inadequate or controversial data in the literature, several issues concerning the management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain unanswered. The aim of this international, expert-based Delphi consensus document was to provide some guidance for clinicians on these controversial topics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-round Delphi consensus document was produced with 44 experts on 6 prespecified topics regarding the management of AAAs. All answers were provided anonymously. The response rate for each round was 100%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants (42 of 44 [95.4%]) agreed that a minimum case volume per year is essential (or probably essential) for a center to offer open or endovascular AAA repair (EVAR). Furthermore, 33 of 44 (75.0%) believed that AAA screening programs are (probably) still clinically effective and cost effective. Additionally, most panelists (36 of 44 [81.9%]) voted that surveillance after EVAR should be (or should probably be) lifelong. Finally, 35 of 44 participants (79.7%) thought that women smokers should (or should probably/possibly) be considered for screening at 65 years of age, similar to men. No consensus was achieved regarding lowering the threshold for AAA repair and the need for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing EVAR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This expert-based Delphi consensus document provides guidance for clinicians regarding specific unresolved issues. Consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting the need for further research in those areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"483-492.e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:由于文献中的数据相互矛盾、不充分或存在争议,有关腹主动脉瘤(AAA)患者管理的几个问题仍未得到解答。这份基于国际专家的德尔菲共识文件旨在就这些有争议的问题为临床医生提供一些指导:方法:44 位专家就有关 AAA 管理的 6 个预先指定的主题编写了一份三轮德尔菲共识文件。所有答案均以匿名方式提供。每轮的回复率均为 100%:大多数参与者(44 位中的 42 位;95.4%)同意,对于提供开放式/血管内 AAA 修补术 (EVAR) 的中心而言,最低病例量/年是必要条件(或可能是必要条件)。此外,44 位专家中有 33 位(75.0%)认为 AAA 筛查项目(可能)仍然具有临床效果和成本效益。此外,大多数专家组成员(44 人中有 36 人,占 81.9%)认为 EVAR 后的监测应该(或可能应该)是终身性的。最后,44 位参与者中有 35 位(79.7%)认为女性吸烟者应该(或可能/应该)与男性吸烟者一样在 65 岁时接受筛查。对于降低AAA修复的门槛以及接受EVAR手术的患者是否需要预防深静脉血栓形成,与会者未达成共识:这份以专家为基础的德尔菲共识文件为临床医生提供了有关具体未决问题的指导。在某些主题上未能达成共识,这说明需要在这些领域开展进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An international, expert-based, Delphi consensus document on controversial issues in the management of abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Objective: As a result of conflicting, inadequate or controversial data in the literature, several issues concerning the management of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) remain unanswered. The aim of this international, expert-based Delphi consensus document was to provide some guidance for clinicians on these controversial topics.

Methods: A three-round Delphi consensus document was produced with 44 experts on 6 prespecified topics regarding the management of AAAs. All answers were provided anonymously. The response rate for each round was 100%.

Results: Most participants (42 of 44 [95.4%]) agreed that a minimum case volume per year is essential (or probably essential) for a center to offer open or endovascular AAA repair (EVAR). Furthermore, 33 of 44 (75.0%) believed that AAA screening programs are (probably) still clinically effective and cost effective. Additionally, most panelists (36 of 44 [81.9%]) voted that surveillance after EVAR should be (or should probably be) lifelong. Finally, 35 of 44 participants (79.7%) thought that women smokers should (or should probably/possibly) be considered for screening at 65 years of age, similar to men. No consensus was achieved regarding lowering the threshold for AAA repair and the need for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients undergoing EVAR.

Conclusions: This expert-based Delphi consensus document provides guidance for clinicians regarding specific unresolved issues. Consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting the need for further research in those areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
The great gender dilemma in complex aortic repair: Why do women fare worse with FEVAR? Controversies in the management strategy for symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion. Endovascular strategies for the short distance between the lowest renal artery and aortic bifurcation. How do we afford the BEST care for females with chronic limb-threatening ischemia? How should failed infrarenal endovascular aortic repair with a short renal artery to bifurcation distance be managed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1