Lara Teheux, Ester H A J Coolen, Brenda van Voorthuizen, Fleur L H van den Udenhout, Bernice A M Theeuwes, Jos M T Draaisma, Michèl A A P Willemsen, Antoinette C Bolte, Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink, Janiëlle A E M van der Velden
{"title":"探索住院医师专业指导评估的价值。","authors":"Lara Teheux, Ester H A J Coolen, Brenda van Voorthuizen, Fleur L H van den Udenhout, Bernice A M Theeuwes, Jos M T Draaisma, Michèl A A P Willemsen, Antoinette C Bolte, Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink, Janiëlle A E M van der Velden","doi":"10.4300/JGME-D-23-00876.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Research on how tools can support coaching of residents is lacking. We hypothesized that an electronic assessment (EA) tool presently applied in selection for residency training, which measures cognitive capacities, personality, motivational drivers, and competencies, could be a valuable tool to support coaching of residents. <b>Objective</b> This study explored the value and limitations, as perceived by residents and coaches, of using the EA to facilitate a single coaching session. <b>Methods</b> This qualitative study took place in the East-Netherlands Training District from August 2022 to April 2023. Volunteer residents and professionally trained coaches engaged in a single coaching session, using the EA. A purposive sample of 7 residents in different training years from 3 specialties were recruited via the training secretariats. Individual interviews with residents were conducted 1 week and 3 months after the coaching session. Data collection ceased when data sufficiency was considered reached. A focus group interview was held with the 3 participating coaches. Thematic analysis was employed to identify themes. <b>Results</b> Participants considered the EA a supportive tool, but not the core focus in the coaching process. Coaching sessions remained guided by residents' individual needs. The EA was considered supportive in fostering residents' self-reflection and awareness, accelerating the coaching process by enhancing preparedness and fostering familiarity among residents and coaches. The perceived value of the EA for the coaching process was affected by residents' and coaches' attitudes toward the tool. <b>Conclusions</b> The EA played a supportive but nonprominent role in the coaching of residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":37886,"journal":{"name":"Journal of graduate medical education","volume":"16 4","pages":"436-444"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324177/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Value of an Assessment for the Professional Coaching of Residents.\",\"authors\":\"Lara Teheux, Ester H A J Coolen, Brenda van Voorthuizen, Fleur L H van den Udenhout, Bernice A M Theeuwes, Jos M T Draaisma, Michèl A A P Willemsen, Antoinette C Bolte, Wietske Kuijer-Siebelink, Janiëlle A E M van der Velden\",\"doi\":\"10.4300/JGME-D-23-00876.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> Research on how tools can support coaching of residents is lacking. We hypothesized that an electronic assessment (EA) tool presently applied in selection for residency training, which measures cognitive capacities, personality, motivational drivers, and competencies, could be a valuable tool to support coaching of residents. <b>Objective</b> This study explored the value and limitations, as perceived by residents and coaches, of using the EA to facilitate a single coaching session. <b>Methods</b> This qualitative study took place in the East-Netherlands Training District from August 2022 to April 2023. Volunteer residents and professionally trained coaches engaged in a single coaching session, using the EA. A purposive sample of 7 residents in different training years from 3 specialties were recruited via the training secretariats. Individual interviews with residents were conducted 1 week and 3 months after the coaching session. Data collection ceased when data sufficiency was considered reached. A focus group interview was held with the 3 participating coaches. Thematic analysis was employed to identify themes. <b>Results</b> Participants considered the EA a supportive tool, but not the core focus in the coaching process. Coaching sessions remained guided by residents' individual needs. The EA was considered supportive in fostering residents' self-reflection and awareness, accelerating the coaching process by enhancing preparedness and fostering familiarity among residents and coaches. The perceived value of the EA for the coaching process was affected by residents' and coaches' attitudes toward the tool. <b>Conclusions</b> The EA played a supportive but nonprominent role in the coaching of residents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37886,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"436-444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11324177/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of graduate medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00876.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of graduate medical education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-23-00876.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 关于如何利用工具支持住院医师指导的研究还很缺乏。我们假设,目前用于住院医师培训选拔的电子评估(EA)工具可以成为支持住院医师辅导的重要工具,该工具可测量认知能力、个性、动机驱动因素和能力。目的 本研究探讨了住院医师和教练对使用 EA 来促进单次教练课程的价值和局限性的看法。方法 本定性研究于 2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 4 月在东荷兰训练区进行。居民志愿者和经过专业培训的教练使用 EA 参与了单次教练课程。通过培训秘书处招募了来自 3 个专科不同培训年级的 7 名住院医师作为目的性样本。在教练课程结束 1 周和 3 个月后,分别对住院医师进行了个别访谈。数据收集工作在认为数据足够时停止。与 3 名参与教练进行了焦点小组访谈。采用主题分析法确定主题。结果 参与者认为 EA 是一种辅助工具,但不是辅导过程中的核心重点。辅导课程仍然以居民的个人需求为导向。在促进居民的自我反思和意识方面,EA 被认为是一种支持性工具;通过加强准备工作和促进居民与教练之间的熟悉程度,EA 加快了教练过程。居民和教练对 EA 工具的态度影响了他们对 EA 在辅导过程中价值的认知。结论 EA 在指导住院医师的过程中起到了辅助作用,但并不突出。
Exploring the Value of an Assessment for the Professional Coaching of Residents.
Background Research on how tools can support coaching of residents is lacking. We hypothesized that an electronic assessment (EA) tool presently applied in selection for residency training, which measures cognitive capacities, personality, motivational drivers, and competencies, could be a valuable tool to support coaching of residents. Objective This study explored the value and limitations, as perceived by residents and coaches, of using the EA to facilitate a single coaching session. Methods This qualitative study took place in the East-Netherlands Training District from August 2022 to April 2023. Volunteer residents and professionally trained coaches engaged in a single coaching session, using the EA. A purposive sample of 7 residents in different training years from 3 specialties were recruited via the training secretariats. Individual interviews with residents were conducted 1 week and 3 months after the coaching session. Data collection ceased when data sufficiency was considered reached. A focus group interview was held with the 3 participating coaches. Thematic analysis was employed to identify themes. Results Participants considered the EA a supportive tool, but not the core focus in the coaching process. Coaching sessions remained guided by residents' individual needs. The EA was considered supportive in fostering residents' self-reflection and awareness, accelerating the coaching process by enhancing preparedness and fostering familiarity among residents and coaches. The perceived value of the EA for the coaching process was affected by residents' and coaches' attitudes toward the tool. Conclusions The EA played a supportive but nonprominent role in the coaching of residents.
期刊介绍:
- Be the leading peer-reviewed journal in graduate medical education; - Promote scholarship and enhance the quality of research in the field; - Disseminate evidence-based approaches for teaching, assessment, and improving the learning environment; and - Generate new knowledge that enhances graduates'' ability to provide high-quality, cost-effective care.