社会关系是性暴力相关态度的保护因素。

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 WOMENS STUDIES Violence Against Women Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1177/10778012241270187
Julia O'Connor, Jill Hoxmeier, Jackie Woerner, Alison Cares
{"title":"社会关系是性暴力相关态度的保护因素。","authors":"Julia O'Connor, Jill Hoxmeier, Jackie Woerner, Alison Cares","doi":"10.1177/10778012241270187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endorsing problematic sexual violence-related attitudes including rape myth acceptance (RMA), hostile sexism, and disapproval of sexual consent is associated with negative outcomes, including the perpetration of sexual violence. This study examined social connections as a protective factor for sexual violence-related attitudes among a sample of 770 participants. Results indicate that in the full sample, connections to a workplace were protective for RMA and hostile sexism while family connections were protective for disapproval of sexual consent, RMA, and hostile sexism. Patterns of other social connections differed in separate models for men and women. Unexpected findings indicating that connections to a religious social group are a risk, not a protective, factor are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23606,"journal":{"name":"Violence Against Women","volume":" ","pages":"10778012241270187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Connections as a Protective Factor for Sexual Violence-Related Attitudes.\",\"authors\":\"Julia O'Connor, Jill Hoxmeier, Jackie Woerner, Alison Cares\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10778012241270187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Endorsing problematic sexual violence-related attitudes including rape myth acceptance (RMA), hostile sexism, and disapproval of sexual consent is associated with negative outcomes, including the perpetration of sexual violence. This study examined social connections as a protective factor for sexual violence-related attitudes among a sample of 770 participants. Results indicate that in the full sample, connections to a workplace were protective for RMA and hostile sexism while family connections were protective for disapproval of sexual consent, RMA, and hostile sexism. Patterns of other social connections differed in separate models for men and women. Unexpected findings indicating that connections to a religious social group are a risk, not a protective, factor are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Violence Against Women\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10778012241270187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Violence Against Women\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241270187\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WOMENS STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Violence Against Women","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241270187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WOMENS STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

认可有问题的性暴力相关态度,包括接受强奸谬论(RMA)、敌意性别歧视和不认可性同意,与包括实施性暴力在内的负面结果有关。本研究在 770 名参与者中抽样调查了社会关系对性暴力相关态度的保护作用。结果表明,在全部样本中,与工作场所的联系对 RMA 和敌意性别歧视具有保护作用,而与家庭的联系对不认可性同意、RMA 和敌意性别歧视具有保护作用。在男性和女性的不同模型中,其他社会关系的模式也有所不同。意外的发现表明,与宗教社会团体的联系是一个风险因素,而不是一个保护因素,对此进行了讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Connections as a Protective Factor for Sexual Violence-Related Attitudes.

Endorsing problematic sexual violence-related attitudes including rape myth acceptance (RMA), hostile sexism, and disapproval of sexual consent is associated with negative outcomes, including the perpetration of sexual violence. This study examined social connections as a protective factor for sexual violence-related attitudes among a sample of 770 participants. Results indicate that in the full sample, connections to a workplace were protective for RMA and hostile sexism while family connections were protective for disapproval of sexual consent, RMA, and hostile sexism. Patterns of other social connections differed in separate models for men and women. Unexpected findings indicating that connections to a religious social group are a risk, not a protective, factor are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Violence Against Women
Violence Against Women WOMENS STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: Violence against Women is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of research and information on all aspects of the problem of violence against women. The journal assumes a broad definition of violence; topics to be covered include, but are not limited to, domestic violence, sexual assault, incest, sexual harassment, female infantcide, female circumcision, and female sexual slavery.
期刊最新文献
Between International Policy and Local Practice: Nepali Service Providers' Constructions of Domestic Violence in Context. Love's Paradox: Unraveling the Dynamics of Love and Psychological Intimate Partner Violence Against Women. Obstetric Violence (OV) Consequences and Coping Strategies: Insights Through the Voices of Arab and Jewish Women in Israel. Challenges Identifying Domestic Violence in Chinese Judicial Practice: An Empirical Analysis of Personal Safety Protection Orders. "You're Never Really Safe": Exploring UK Mothers' and Young Women's Perceptions of Sexual Violence Risk.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1