高收入国家专利到期后的药品价格及其对成本效益分析的影响。

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2530
Miquel Serra-Burriel, Nicolau Martin-Bassols, Gellért Perényi, Kerstin N Vokinger
{"title":"高收入国家专利到期后的药品价格及其对成本效益分析的影响。","authors":"Miquel Serra-Burriel, Nicolau Martin-Bassols, Gellért Perényi, Kerstin N Vokinger","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Understanding how patent expirations affect drug prices is crucial because price changes directly inform accurate cost-effectiveness assessments. This study investigates the association between patent expirations and drug prices in 8 high-income countries and evaluates how the changes affect cost-effectiveness assessments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze how the expiration of drug patents is associated with drug price changes and to assess the implications of these price changes for cost-effectiveness evaluations.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study performed an event study design using data from 8 high-income countries to assess the association between patent expiration and drug prices, and created a simulation model to understand the implications for cost-effectiveness analyses. The simulation cost-effectiveness model analyzed the implications of including or ignoring postpatent price dynamics.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Drug patent expiration.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Change in drug prices and differences in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios when considering vs ignoring postpatent price dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 505 drugs undergoing patent expiration in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, UK, and US. Price decreases were statistically significant over the 8 years after patent expiration, with the fastest price declines observed in the US: 32% (95% CI, 24%-39%) in year 1 after patent expiration and 82% (95% CI, 71%-89%) in the 8 years after patent expiration. Estimates for other nations ranged from a decrease of 64% in Australia to 18% in Switzerland in the 8 years after expiration. The cost-effectiveness simulation model indicated that not accounting for generic entry into the market may produce biased incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 40% to -40%, depending on the scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this cohort study demonstrate that drug prices were reduced substantially after patent expirations in high-income countries. Therefore, incorporating information on patent status and pricing dynamics in cost-effectiveness assessment analyses is necessary for producing accurate economic evaluations of new drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329876/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Prices After Patent Expirations in High-Income Countries and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.\",\"authors\":\"Miquel Serra-Burriel, Nicolau Martin-Bassols, Gellért Perényi, Kerstin N Vokinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Understanding how patent expirations affect drug prices is crucial because price changes directly inform accurate cost-effectiveness assessments. This study investigates the association between patent expirations and drug prices in 8 high-income countries and evaluates how the changes affect cost-effectiveness assessments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze how the expiration of drug patents is associated with drug price changes and to assess the implications of these price changes for cost-effectiveness evaluations.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study performed an event study design using data from 8 high-income countries to assess the association between patent expiration and drug prices, and created a simulation model to understand the implications for cost-effectiveness analyses. The simulation cost-effectiveness model analyzed the implications of including or ignoring postpatent price dynamics.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Drug patent expiration.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Change in drug prices and differences in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios when considering vs ignoring postpatent price dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample comprised 505 drugs undergoing patent expiration in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, UK, and US. Price decreases were statistically significant over the 8 years after patent expiration, with the fastest price declines observed in the US: 32% (95% CI, 24%-39%) in year 1 after patent expiration and 82% (95% CI, 71%-89%) in the 8 years after patent expiration. Estimates for other nations ranged from a decrease of 64% in Australia to 18% in Switzerland in the 8 years after expiration. The cost-effectiveness simulation model indicated that not accounting for generic entry into the market may produce biased incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 40% to -40%, depending on the scenario.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>The findings of this cohort study demonstrate that drug prices were reduced substantially after patent expirations in high-income countries. Therefore, incorporating information on patent status and pricing dynamics in cost-effectiveness assessment analyses is necessary for producing accurate economic evaluations of new drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11329876/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA Health Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.2530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:了解专利到期如何影响药品价格至关重要,因为价格变化直接影响到准确的成本效益评估。本研究调查了 8 个高收入国家的专利到期与药品价格之间的关联,并评估了这些变化对成本效益评估的影响:分析药品专利到期与药品价格变化之间的关系,并评估这些价格变化对成本效益评估的影响:这项队列研究采用了事件研究设计,使用了 8 个高收入国家的数据来评估专利到期与药品价格之间的关联,并创建了一个模拟模型来了解其对成本效益分析的影响。模拟成本效益模型分析了包括或忽略专利后价格动态的影响:主要结果和衡量标准:主要结果和测量指标:药品价格的变化以及考虑与忽略专利后价格动态时的增量成本效益比的差异:样本包括澳大利亚、加拿大、法国、德国、日本、瑞士、英国和美国的 505 种专利到期药物。在专利到期后的 8 年中,价格下降具有显著的统计学意义,其中美国的价格下降最快:专利到期后第一年的降价幅度为 32%(95% CI,24%-39%),专利到期后 8 年的降价幅度为 82%(95% CI,71%-89%)。其他国家的估计值从澳大利亚专利到期后 8 年内减少 64% 到瑞士专利到期后 8 年内减少 18% 不等。成本效益模拟模型显示,如果不考虑仿制药进入市场的因素,可能会产生 40% 至 -40% 的增量成本效益比偏差,具体取决于不同的情况:这项队列研究的结果表明,高收入国家的药品价格在专利到期后大幅下降。因此,要对新药进行准确的经济评估,就必须在成本效益评估分析中纳入有关专利状况和定价动态的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drug Prices After Patent Expirations in High-Income Countries and Implications for Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.

Importance: Understanding how patent expirations affect drug prices is crucial because price changes directly inform accurate cost-effectiveness assessments. This study investigates the association between patent expirations and drug prices in 8 high-income countries and evaluates how the changes affect cost-effectiveness assessments.

Objective: To analyze how the expiration of drug patents is associated with drug price changes and to assess the implications of these price changes for cost-effectiveness evaluations.

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study performed an event study design using data from 8 high-income countries to assess the association between patent expiration and drug prices, and created a simulation model to understand the implications for cost-effectiveness analyses. The simulation cost-effectiveness model analyzed the implications of including or ignoring postpatent price dynamics.

Exposure: Drug patent expiration.

Main outcomes and measures: Change in drug prices and differences in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios when considering vs ignoring postpatent price dynamics.

Results: The sample comprised 505 drugs undergoing patent expiration in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, UK, and US. Price decreases were statistically significant over the 8 years after patent expiration, with the fastest price declines observed in the US: 32% (95% CI, 24%-39%) in year 1 after patent expiration and 82% (95% CI, 71%-89%) in the 8 years after patent expiration. Estimates for other nations ranged from a decrease of 64% in Australia to 18% in Switzerland in the 8 years after expiration. The cost-effectiveness simulation model indicated that not accounting for generic entry into the market may produce biased incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of 40% to -40%, depending on the scenario.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this cohort study demonstrate that drug prices were reduced substantially after patent expirations in high-income countries. Therefore, incorporating information on patent status and pricing dynamics in cost-effectiveness assessment analyses is necessary for producing accurate economic evaluations of new drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Medical Debt-The Canary in the Coal Mine for Health Care Affordability. Disparities in Medication Use for Criminal Justice System-Referred Opioid Use Disorder Treatment. JAMA Health Forum. Medicare Advantage Supplemental Benefits for Dual-Eligible Benificiaries and Recommendations for Reform. Rental Housing Deposits and Health Care Use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1