APPLE 评分在预测消融术后早期房颤复发方面表现更佳。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Hellenic Journal of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.008
Wenchao Huang, Huaxin Sun, Yan Luo, Shiqiang Xiong, Yan Tang, Yu Long, Zhen Zhang, Hanxiong Liu
{"title":"APPLE 评分在预测消融术后早期房颤复发方面表现更佳。","authors":"Wenchao Huang, Huaxin Sun, Yan Luo, Shiqiang Xiong, Yan Tang, Yu Long, Zhen Zhang, Hanxiong Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The benefits of rhythm control in early atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasingly recognized. This study aimed to investigate whether early AF ablation contributes to long-term sinus rhythm maintenance and to identify a suitable predictive score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to diagnosis-to-ablation time, this study prospectively enrolled 245 patients with very early AF, 262 with early AF, and 588 with late AF for radiofrequency ablation from June 2017 to December 2022. Clinical data, risk scores, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar among the three cohorts. During a median follow-up period of 26 months, AF recurrence was observed in 61 (24.9%), 66 (25.2%), and 216 (36.7%) patients in the very early, early, and late AF cohorts, respectively. In the multivariable-adjusted model, very early and early AF were associated with a reduced risk of AF recurrence, with hazard ratios of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.99) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.41-0.78), respectively. The APPLE score demonstrated the highest predictive power for very early AF, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74. However, its predictive power decreased with time from diagnosis, showing low predictive power for late AF (AUC = 0.58). In addition, the time-dependent concordance index showed consistent results. For very early AF, the Akaike information criterion and decision curve analysis showed that APPLE had the highest predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Very early AF ablation was associated with a lower recurrence rate, and the APPLE score provided a higher predictive value for these patients. (URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-OIN-17013021).</p>","PeriodicalId":55062,"journal":{"name":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Better performance of the APPLE score for the prediction of very early atrial fibrillation recurrence post-ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Wenchao Huang, Huaxin Sun, Yan Luo, Shiqiang Xiong, Yan Tang, Yu Long, Zhen Zhang, Hanxiong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The benefits of rhythm control in early atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasingly recognized. This study aimed to investigate whether early AF ablation contributes to long-term sinus rhythm maintenance and to identify a suitable predictive score.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>According to diagnosis-to-ablation time, this study prospectively enrolled 245 patients with very early AF, 262 with early AF, and 588 with late AF for radiofrequency ablation from June 2017 to December 2022. Clinical data, risk scores, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were similar among the three cohorts. During a median follow-up period of 26 months, AF recurrence was observed in 61 (24.9%), 66 (25.2%), and 216 (36.7%) patients in the very early, early, and late AF cohorts, respectively. In the multivariable-adjusted model, very early and early AF were associated with a reduced risk of AF recurrence, with hazard ratios of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.99) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.41-0.78), respectively. The APPLE score demonstrated the highest predictive power for very early AF, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74. However, its predictive power decreased with time from diagnosis, showing low predictive power for late AF (AUC = 0.58). In addition, the time-dependent concordance index showed consistent results. For very early AF, the Akaike information criterion and decision curve analysis showed that APPLE had the highest predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Very early AF ablation was associated with a lower recurrence rate, and the APPLE score provided a higher predictive value for these patients. (URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-OIN-17013021).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hellenic Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjc.2024.08.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的人认识到早期房颤(AF)节律控制的益处。本研究旨在探讨早期房颤消融是否有助于窦性心律的长期维持,并确定合适的预测评分:根据从诊断到消融的时间,本研究在2017年6月至2022年12月期间前瞻性地招募了245名极早期房颤患者、262名早期房颤患者和588名晚期房颤患者进行射频消融。收集并分析了临床数据、风险评分和随访结果:三组患者的基线特征相似。中位随访期为26个月,在极早期、早期和晚期房颤组别中,分别有61例(24.9%)、66例(25.2%)和216例(36.7%)患者观察到房颤复发。在多变量调整模型中,极早期和早期房颤与房颤复发风险降低相关,危险比分别为 0.72(95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.52-0.99)和 0.57(95% CI:0.41-0.78)。APPLE 评分对极早期房颤的预测能力最高,曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.74。然而,其预测能力随着诊断时间的延长而下降,对晚期房颤的预测能力较低(AUC=0.58)。此外,与时间相关的一致性指数也显示出一致的结果。对于极早期房颤,阿凯克信息标准和决策曲线分析表明,APPLE的预测价值最高:结论:极早期房颤消融与较低的复发率相关,APPLE 评分可为其提供较高的预测值。(网址:https://www.chictr.org.cn/;唯一标识符:ChiCTR-OIN-17013021)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Better performance of the APPLE score for the prediction of very early atrial fibrillation recurrence post-ablation.

Objective: The benefits of rhythm control in early atrial fibrillation (AF) are increasingly recognized. This study aimed to investigate whether early AF ablation contributes to long-term sinus rhythm maintenance and to identify a suitable predictive score.

Methods: According to diagnosis-to-ablation time, this study prospectively enrolled 245 patients with very early AF, 262 with early AF, and 588 with late AF for radiofrequency ablation from June 2017 to December 2022. Clinical data, risk scores, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed.

Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among the three cohorts. During a median follow-up period of 26 months, AF recurrence was observed in 61 (24.9%), 66 (25.2%), and 216 (36.7%) patients in the very early, early, and late AF cohorts, respectively. In the multivariable-adjusted model, very early and early AF were associated with a reduced risk of AF recurrence, with hazard ratios of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.99) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.41-0.78), respectively. The APPLE score demonstrated the highest predictive power for very early AF, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.74. However, its predictive power decreased with time from diagnosis, showing low predictive power for late AF (AUC = 0.58). In addition, the time-dependent concordance index showed consistent results. For very early AF, the Akaike information criterion and decision curve analysis showed that APPLE had the highest predictive value.

Conclusion: Very early AF ablation was associated with a lower recurrence rate, and the APPLE score provided a higher predictive value for these patients. (URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/; Unique identifier: ChiCTR-OIN-17013021).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology
Hellenic Journal of Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
86
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The Hellenic Journal of Cardiology (International Edition, ISSN 1109-9666) is the official journal of the Hellenic Society of Cardiology and aims to publish high-quality articles on all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. A primary goal is to publish in each issue a number of original articles related to clinical and basic research. Many of these will be accompanied by invited editorial comments. Hot topics, such as molecular cardiology, and innovative cardiac imaging and electrophysiological mapping techniques, will appear frequently in the journal in the form of invited expert articles or special reports. The Editorial Committee also attaches great importance to subjects related to continuing medical education, the implementation of guidelines and cost effectiveness in cardiology.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of continuous flow centrifugal left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplant strategy in a low organ donation environment: Single center experience. Impact of three-month treatment with pitavastatin on arterial stiffness in patients with hypercholesterolemia: a prospective observational study. Multimodality imaging for the diagnosis of giant cavernous hemangioma of the right ventricle. Comparing the predictive ability of GRACE 2.0 and GRACE 3.0 scores in a Greek cohort of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndrome. New guidelines of EACTS/STS on aortic disease: A useful tool for the management of "aortic organ" disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1