{"title":"生物学和物理学中的期望-价值-成本动机特征:它们与性别、自我报告的需求满足和学习行为的关系","authors":"Eve Kikas , Ita Puusepp , Kati Aus","doi":"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to 1) identify groups of students with different expectancy, intrinsic and utility value, and cost profiles in biology and physics, and 2) to examine group differences in sources of beliefs (gender, students' perceptions of their biology and physics teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior) and students' learning behavior (reported persistence and use of learning strategies). In total, 1502 eighth and ninth grade students from Estonia filled in questionnaires. With latent profile analysis, four general (<em>Indifferent, Maladaptive, Moderate</em>, and <em>Adaptive</em>) and two subject-specific (<em>Biology-Adaptive</em> and <em>Physics-Adaptive</em>) motivational profiles were identified. These groups differed in gender composition, students' perceptions of their teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior, task-persistent learning behavior, and reported use of deep learning strategies. The findings suggest that motivation may develop differently within each subject. Examining motivation across two or more subjects adds valuable information about individual differences and has practical implications for supporting motivation in various subjects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48336,"journal":{"name":"Learning and Individual Differences","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102520"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expectancy-value-cost motivational profiles in biology and physics: Their relations with gender, self-reported satisfaction of needs, and learning behavior\",\"authors\":\"Eve Kikas , Ita Puusepp , Kati Aus\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102520\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to 1) identify groups of students with different expectancy, intrinsic and utility value, and cost profiles in biology and physics, and 2) to examine group differences in sources of beliefs (gender, students' perceptions of their biology and physics teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior) and students' learning behavior (reported persistence and use of learning strategies). In total, 1502 eighth and ninth grade students from Estonia filled in questionnaires. With latent profile analysis, four general (<em>Indifferent, Maladaptive, Moderate</em>, and <em>Adaptive</em>) and two subject-specific (<em>Biology-Adaptive</em> and <em>Physics-Adaptive</em>) motivational profiles were identified. These groups differed in gender composition, students' perceptions of their teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior, task-persistent learning behavior, and reported use of deep learning strategies. The findings suggest that motivation may develop differently within each subject. Examining motivation across two or more subjects adds valuable information about individual differences and has practical implications for supporting motivation in various subjects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102520\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning and Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001134\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning and Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608024001134","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Expectancy-value-cost motivational profiles in biology and physics: Their relations with gender, self-reported satisfaction of needs, and learning behavior
This study aimed to 1) identify groups of students with different expectancy, intrinsic and utility value, and cost profiles in biology and physics, and 2) to examine group differences in sources of beliefs (gender, students' perceptions of their biology and physics teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior) and students' learning behavior (reported persistence and use of learning strategies). In total, 1502 eighth and ninth grade students from Estonia filled in questionnaires. With latent profile analysis, four general (Indifferent, Maladaptive, Moderate, and Adaptive) and two subject-specific (Biology-Adaptive and Physics-Adaptive) motivational profiles were identified. These groups differed in gender composition, students' perceptions of their teachers' need-supportive and need-thwarting behavior, task-persistent learning behavior, and reported use of deep learning strategies. The findings suggest that motivation may develop differently within each subject. Examining motivation across two or more subjects adds valuable information about individual differences and has practical implications for supporting motivation in various subjects.
期刊介绍:
Learning and Individual Differences is a research journal devoted to publishing articles of individual differences as they relate to learning within an educational context. The Journal focuses on original empirical studies of high theoretical and methodological rigor that that make a substantial scientific contribution. Learning and Individual Differences publishes original research. Manuscripts should be no longer than 7500 words of primary text (not including tables, figures, references).