Gabriel Maggi , Otávio S. Pires , Sérgio F. Vargas Junior , Fernando C. Oliveira , Fabiane P. Moraes , Rogério Ferreira , Arnaldo D. Vieira , Monique T. Rovani , Paulo B.D. Gonçalves , Rafael G. Mondadori , Bernardo G. Gasperin
{"title":"在配种季节对母羊进行定时人工授精的激素方案中,是否可以用 GnRH 替代 eCG?","authors":"Gabriel Maggi , Otávio S. Pires , Sérgio F. Vargas Junior , Fernando C. Oliveira , Fabiane P. Moraes , Rogério Ferreira , Arnaldo D. Vieira , Monique T. Rovani , Paulo B.D. Gonçalves , Rafael G. Mondadori , Bernardo G. Gasperin","doi":"10.1016/j.domaniend.2024.106878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hormonal protocols based on progestogens and equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) are efficient for estrus and ovulation synchronization in ewes. Although eCG is indispensable during seasonal anestrus, it may not be necessary during the breeding season. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that GnRH is effective in replacing eCG during the breeding season allowing satisfactory ovulation rate, luteal function and conception rates after timed artificial insemination (TAI). Ewes (<em>n</em> = 134) with a minimum body condition score of 2.5 (0–5 scale) were treated with intravaginal devices (IVD) containing 60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for seven days and received 0.26 mg of sodium cloprostenol at the time of IVD removal. In Exp. 1, at IVD removal, ewes (<em>n</em> = 29) were allocated to three groups: eCG (200 IU at IVD removal; <em>n</em> = 10); eCG+GnRH (200 IU eCG at IVD removal and 4 µg of buserelin 36 h later; <em>n</em> = 10); or GnRH (buserelin 36 h after IVD removal; <em>n</em> = 9). Blood samples were collected 2, 6 and 12 days after TAI moment (54 h after IVD removal), for progesterone (P4) analysis. In Exp 2, the ewes were allocated to eCG (<em>n</em> = 10) or GnRH (<em>n</em> = 10) groups, as above described, and ovulation moment was evaluated 54, 66 and 78 h after IVD removal. In Exp 3, TAI was performed in ewes from eCG (<em>n</em> = 45) and GnRH (<em>n</em> = 40) groups using 100 × 10<sup>6</sup> motile spermatozoa from a pool of semen collected from four rams. In Exp. 1, based on P4 levels, we confirmed that all the ewes ovulated (29/29) and there was no significant effect of group (<em>P</em> = 0.89) or group x day (<em>P</em> = 0.18) on P4 concentration, being observed a significant effect of day (<em>P</em> = 0.0001). In Exp. 2, the maximum DF diameter (<em>P</em> = 0.26) and ovulation moment (<em>P</em> = 0.69) did not differ between groups. In Exp. 3, pregnancy rate was significantly lower (<em>P</em> = 0.02) in GnRH (22.5 %; 9/40) compared to eCG (46.7 %; 21/45). The results indicate that, although ovulation and luteal function were not altered after eCG, eCG+GnRH or GnRH treatment, GnRH alone before TAI cannot be used to replace eCG treatment during the breeding season.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11356,"journal":{"name":"Domestic animal endocrinology","volume":"89 ","pages":"Article 106878"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it possible to replace eCG by GnRH in the hormonal protocol for timed artificial insemination in ewes during the breeding season?\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Maggi , Otávio S. Pires , Sérgio F. Vargas Junior , Fernando C. Oliveira , Fabiane P. Moraes , Rogério Ferreira , Arnaldo D. Vieira , Monique T. Rovani , Paulo B.D. Gonçalves , Rafael G. Mondadori , Bernardo G. Gasperin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.domaniend.2024.106878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hormonal protocols based on progestogens and equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) are efficient for estrus and ovulation synchronization in ewes. Although eCG is indispensable during seasonal anestrus, it may not be necessary during the breeding season. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that GnRH is effective in replacing eCG during the breeding season allowing satisfactory ovulation rate, luteal function and conception rates after timed artificial insemination (TAI). Ewes (<em>n</em> = 134) with a minimum body condition score of 2.5 (0–5 scale) were treated with intravaginal devices (IVD) containing 60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for seven days and received 0.26 mg of sodium cloprostenol at the time of IVD removal. In Exp. 1, at IVD removal, ewes (<em>n</em> = 29) were allocated to three groups: eCG (200 IU at IVD removal; <em>n</em> = 10); eCG+GnRH (200 IU eCG at IVD removal and 4 µg of buserelin 36 h later; <em>n</em> = 10); or GnRH (buserelin 36 h after IVD removal; <em>n</em> = 9). Blood samples were collected 2, 6 and 12 days after TAI moment (54 h after IVD removal), for progesterone (P4) analysis. In Exp 2, the ewes were allocated to eCG (<em>n</em> = 10) or GnRH (<em>n</em> = 10) groups, as above described, and ovulation moment was evaluated 54, 66 and 78 h after IVD removal. In Exp 3, TAI was performed in ewes from eCG (<em>n</em> = 45) and GnRH (<em>n</em> = 40) groups using 100 × 10<sup>6</sup> motile spermatozoa from a pool of semen collected from four rams. In Exp. 1, based on P4 levels, we confirmed that all the ewes ovulated (29/29) and there was no significant effect of group (<em>P</em> = 0.89) or group x day (<em>P</em> = 0.18) on P4 concentration, being observed a significant effect of day (<em>P</em> = 0.0001). In Exp. 2, the maximum DF diameter (<em>P</em> = 0.26) and ovulation moment (<em>P</em> = 0.69) did not differ between groups. In Exp. 3, pregnancy rate was significantly lower (<em>P</em> = 0.02) in GnRH (22.5 %; 9/40) compared to eCG (46.7 %; 21/45). The results indicate that, although ovulation and luteal function were not altered after eCG, eCG+GnRH or GnRH treatment, GnRH alone before TAI cannot be used to replace eCG treatment during the breeding season.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Domestic animal endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"89 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106878\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Domestic animal endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739724024000419\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Domestic animal endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739724024000419","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is it possible to replace eCG by GnRH in the hormonal protocol for timed artificial insemination in ewes during the breeding season?
Hormonal protocols based on progestogens and equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) are efficient for estrus and ovulation synchronization in ewes. Although eCG is indispensable during seasonal anestrus, it may not be necessary during the breeding season. Thus, we tested the hypothesis that GnRH is effective in replacing eCG during the breeding season allowing satisfactory ovulation rate, luteal function and conception rates after timed artificial insemination (TAI). Ewes (n = 134) with a minimum body condition score of 2.5 (0–5 scale) were treated with intravaginal devices (IVD) containing 60 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) for seven days and received 0.26 mg of sodium cloprostenol at the time of IVD removal. In Exp. 1, at IVD removal, ewes (n = 29) were allocated to three groups: eCG (200 IU at IVD removal; n = 10); eCG+GnRH (200 IU eCG at IVD removal and 4 µg of buserelin 36 h later; n = 10); or GnRH (buserelin 36 h after IVD removal; n = 9). Blood samples were collected 2, 6 and 12 days after TAI moment (54 h after IVD removal), for progesterone (P4) analysis. In Exp 2, the ewes were allocated to eCG (n = 10) or GnRH (n = 10) groups, as above described, and ovulation moment was evaluated 54, 66 and 78 h after IVD removal. In Exp 3, TAI was performed in ewes from eCG (n = 45) and GnRH (n = 40) groups using 100 × 106 motile spermatozoa from a pool of semen collected from four rams. In Exp. 1, based on P4 levels, we confirmed that all the ewes ovulated (29/29) and there was no significant effect of group (P = 0.89) or group x day (P = 0.18) on P4 concentration, being observed a significant effect of day (P = 0.0001). In Exp. 2, the maximum DF diameter (P = 0.26) and ovulation moment (P = 0.69) did not differ between groups. In Exp. 3, pregnancy rate was significantly lower (P = 0.02) in GnRH (22.5 %; 9/40) compared to eCG (46.7 %; 21/45). The results indicate that, although ovulation and luteal function were not altered after eCG, eCG+GnRH or GnRH treatment, GnRH alone before TAI cannot be used to replace eCG treatment during the breeding season.
期刊介绍:
Domestic Animal Endocrinology publishes scientific papers dealing with the study of the endocrine physiology of domestic animal species. Those manuscripts utilizing other species as models for clinical or production problems associated with domestic animals are also welcome.
Topics covered include:
Classical and reproductive endocrinology-
Clinical and applied endocrinology-
Regulation of hormone secretion-
Hormone action-
Molecular biology-
Cytokines-
Growth factors