评估含有缺口型缺陷的结构材料:FAD-TCD 方法在金属和非金属材料上的全面验证

IF 5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104612
{"title":"评估含有缺口型缺陷的结构材料:FAD-TCD 方法在金属和非金属材料上的全面验证","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper provides a comprehensive description, and the subsequent validation, of a structural integrity assessment methodology of structural materials containing notch-type defects. The approach is based on the combination of Failure Assessment Diagrams (FAD) and the Theory of Critical Distances (TCD). The former provides the general assessment tool, which is exactly the same one as that used for crack-like defects, whereas the latter provides the notch effect correction required for the analysis of this type of defects. Finally, the proposed methodology is validated on a number of metallic and non-metallic structural materials, with 1,106 experimental results on different types of testing specimens, covering four structural steels, aluminium alloys 7075-T651 and 6060-T66, PVC, PMMA, PA6, fibre-reinforced PA6, 3D printed (Fused Filament Fabrication) ABS, PLA and graphene reinforced PLA, granite and limestone. The results show how the FAD-TCD methodology provides safe reasonably conservative assessments on the mentioned structural materials in the presence of notch-type defects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22879,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167844224003628/pdfft?md5=bae510efc2cc42e3b8c6d5b84f8f9fa8&pid=1-s2.0-S0167844224003628-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of structural materials containing notch-type defects: A comprehensive validation of the FAD-TCD methodology on metallic and non-metallic materials\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104612\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper provides a comprehensive description, and the subsequent validation, of a structural integrity assessment methodology of structural materials containing notch-type defects. The approach is based on the combination of Failure Assessment Diagrams (FAD) and the Theory of Critical Distances (TCD). The former provides the general assessment tool, which is exactly the same one as that used for crack-like defects, whereas the latter provides the notch effect correction required for the analysis of this type of defects. Finally, the proposed methodology is validated on a number of metallic and non-metallic structural materials, with 1,106 experimental results on different types of testing specimens, covering four structural steels, aluminium alloys 7075-T651 and 6060-T66, PVC, PMMA, PA6, fibre-reinforced PA6, 3D printed (Fused Filament Fabrication) ABS, PLA and graphene reinforced PLA, granite and limestone. The results show how the FAD-TCD methodology provides safe reasonably conservative assessments on the mentioned structural materials in the presence of notch-type defects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167844224003628/pdfft?md5=bae510efc2cc42e3b8c6d5b84f8f9fa8&pid=1-s2.0-S0167844224003628-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167844224003628\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167844224003628","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文全面介绍了对含有缺口型缺陷的结构材料进行结构完整性评估的方法,并随后进行了验证。该方法基于失效评估图(FAD)和临界距离理论(TCD)的结合。前者提供了与裂纹类缺陷完全相同的一般评估工具,而后者提供了分析这类缺陷所需的缺口效应修正。最后,对所提出的方法进行了验证,在不同类型的测试试样上获得了 1,106 项实验结果,包括四种结构钢、铝合金 7075-T651 和 6060-T66、PVC、PMMA、PA6、纤维增强 PA6、3D 打印(熔融丝制造)ABS、PLA 和石墨烯增强 PLA、花岗岩和石灰石。结果表明,FAD-TCD 方法可对存在缺口型缺陷的上述结构材料进行安全、合理、保守的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of structural materials containing notch-type defects: A comprehensive validation of the FAD-TCD methodology on metallic and non-metallic materials

This paper provides a comprehensive description, and the subsequent validation, of a structural integrity assessment methodology of structural materials containing notch-type defects. The approach is based on the combination of Failure Assessment Diagrams (FAD) and the Theory of Critical Distances (TCD). The former provides the general assessment tool, which is exactly the same one as that used for crack-like defects, whereas the latter provides the notch effect correction required for the analysis of this type of defects. Finally, the proposed methodology is validated on a number of metallic and non-metallic structural materials, with 1,106 experimental results on different types of testing specimens, covering four structural steels, aluminium alloys 7075-T651 and 6060-T66, PVC, PMMA, PA6, fibre-reinforced PA6, 3D printed (Fused Filament Fabrication) ABS, PLA and graphene reinforced PLA, granite and limestone. The results show how the FAD-TCD methodology provides safe reasonably conservative assessments on the mentioned structural materials in the presence of notch-type defects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
18.90%
发文量
435
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics'' aims & scopes have been re-designed to cover both the theoretical, applied, and numerical aspects associated with those cracking related phenomena taking place, at a micro-, meso-, and macroscopic level, in materials/components/structures of any kind. The journal aims to cover the cracking/mechanical behaviour of materials/components/structures in those situations involving both time-independent and time-dependent system of external forces/moments (such as, for instance, quasi-static, impulsive, impact, blasting, creep, contact, and fatigue loading). Since, under the above circumstances, the mechanical behaviour of cracked materials/components/structures is also affected by the environmental conditions, the journal would consider also those theoretical/experimental research works investigating the effect of external variables such as, for instance, the effect of corrosive environments as well as of high/low-temperature.
期刊最新文献
Harnessing waste for sustainable construction: A novel synthesizing activators from waste for one-part geopolymer concrete and evaluating its fracture toughness Fracture assessment of blunt V-notched 3D-printed ABS: Proposing a new specimen for testing and different criteria for prediction Analysis of tooth root three-dimensional fatigue crack initiation, propagation, and fatigue life for spur gear transmission Measurement of fracture toughness in high-strength alloys via modified limit load analysis using flat-end cylindrical indenter Lignin fiber reinforced gypsum-cement composite materials: Investigation of fracture properties and freeze–thaw behaviors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1