测试法院合法性相关因素的种族和民族差异

IF 3.3 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Criminal Justice Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102252
Chae M. Jaynes , Jacqueline G. Lee , Richard K. Moule Jr
{"title":"测试法院合法性相关因素的种族和民族差异","authors":"Chae M. Jaynes ,&nbsp;Jacqueline G. Lee ,&nbsp;Richard K. Moule Jr","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore perceptions of court legitimacy and the correlates of these perceptions, as well as assess whether the correlates of court legitimacy vary by race and ethnicity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Regression analysis of data from an online survey (<em>N</em> = 593) of U.S. adults, closely matching Census demographics with an overrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Theoretical antecedents of legitimacy (procedural justice, distributive justice, and effectiveness) predict higher levels of perceived court legitimacy. There are few differences in the antecedents of legitimacy by respondents' race or ethnicity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Key correlates of court legitimacy mirror those of police legitimacy and are also largely invariant across race and ethnicity. Black respondents reported the lowest levels of perceived court legitimacy in general. Future research should further explore the reasons for this difference.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48272,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Justice","volume":"94 ","pages":"Article 102252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing racial and ethnic differences in the correlates of court legitimacy\",\"authors\":\"Chae M. Jaynes ,&nbsp;Jacqueline G. Lee ,&nbsp;Richard K. Moule Jr\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2024.102252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To explore perceptions of court legitimacy and the correlates of these perceptions, as well as assess whether the correlates of court legitimacy vary by race and ethnicity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Regression analysis of data from an online survey (<em>N</em> = 593) of U.S. adults, closely matching Census demographics with an overrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Theoretical antecedents of legitimacy (procedural justice, distributive justice, and effectiveness) predict higher levels of perceived court legitimacy. There are few differences in the antecedents of legitimacy by respondents' race or ethnicity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Key correlates of court legitimacy mirror those of police legitimacy and are also largely invariant across race and ethnicity. Black respondents reported the lowest levels of perceived court legitimacy in general. Future research should further explore the reasons for this difference.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"volume\":\"94 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Criminal Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224001016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Justice","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0047235224001016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨人们对法院合法性的看法及其相关因素,并评估法院合法性的相关因素是否因种族和民族而异。方法对美国成年人在线调查(N = 593)的数据进行回归分析,这些数据与人口普查的人口统计数据密切吻合,其中少数种族和少数民族的比例较高。结果合法性的理论先决条件(程序正义、分配正义和有效性)预示着人们对法院合法性的看法水平较高。结论 法院合法性的主要相关因素与警察合法性的相关因素如出一辙,而且在不同种族和民族之间基本保持不变。总体而言,黑人受访者对法院合法性的认知水平最低。未来的研究应进一步探讨造成这种差异的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Testing racial and ethnic differences in the correlates of court legitimacy

Purpose

To explore perceptions of court legitimacy and the correlates of these perceptions, as well as assess whether the correlates of court legitimacy vary by race and ethnicity.

Methods

Regression analysis of data from an online survey (N = 593) of U.S. adults, closely matching Census demographics with an overrepresentation of racial and ethnic minorities.

Results

Theoretical antecedents of legitimacy (procedural justice, distributive justice, and effectiveness) predict higher levels of perceived court legitimacy. There are few differences in the antecedents of legitimacy by respondents' race or ethnicity.

Conclusions

Key correlates of court legitimacy mirror those of police legitimacy and are also largely invariant across race and ethnicity. Black respondents reported the lowest levels of perceived court legitimacy in general. Future research should further explore the reasons for this difference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Justice
Journal of Criminal Justice CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Criminal Justice is an international journal intended to fill the present need for the dissemination of new information, ideas and methods, to both practitioners and academicians in the criminal justice area. The Journal is concerned with all aspects of the criminal justice system in terms of their relationships to each other. Although materials are presented relating to crime and the individual elements of the criminal justice system, the emphasis of the Journal is to tie together the functioning of these elements and to illustrate the effects of their interactions. Articles that reflect the application of new disciplines or analytical methodologies to the problems of criminal justice are of special interest. Since the purpose of the Journal is to provide a forum for the dissemination of new ideas, new information, and the application of new methods to the problems and functions of the criminal justice system, the Journal emphasizes innovation and creative thought of the highest quality.
期刊最新文献
Head injury, sleep disturbance, and delinquent offending: Evidence from a longitudinal sample of juvenile detainees Effects of substance use treatment on recidivism for youth in need of treatment Identifying subpopulations in forensic addiction care: A latent class analysis The effects of Covid-19 stay-at-home orders on street and cybercrimes in a Brazilian city Prosecutorial discretion not to invoke the criminal process and its impact on firearm cases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1