{"title":"印度男性的职业与罹患口腔黏膜癌的风险:一项多中心病例对照研究","authors":"Romi Moirangthem , Bayan Hosseini , Aniket Patil , Grace Sarah George , Ankita Manjrekar , Pravin Doibale , Shruti Vishwas Golapkar , Nandkumar Panse , Manigreeva Krishnatreya , Aseem Mishra , Arjun Singh , Anil Chaturvedi , Pankaj Chaturvedi , Rajesh Dikshit , Ann Olsson , Sharayu Mhatre","doi":"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the association between lifetime occupational history and risk of buccal mucosa cancer (BMC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilized a multi-centric, hospital-based case-control study across five centres of Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. Cases included men aged 20–75-years with histological confirmed primary cancer of the buccal mucosa. Visitor controls were frequency matched to cases for age (10 years interval) and current residential zone. Study participants were interviewed face-to-face. Logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among ever employed males, we identified 1969 BMC cases and 2145 controls. We observed an increased risk of BMC in ‘Craft and Related Trades Workers’ (OR 1.37; 95 % CI 1.13–1.65), ‘Plant and Machine Operators and Assemblers’ (OR: 1.26; 95 % CI 1.01–1.56), and ‘Elementary Occupations’ (OR:1.33; 95 % CI 1.12–1.58). More specifically, the increased risk was observed for ‘Metal, Machinery and Related Trades Workers’, ‘Handicraft and Printing Workers’, ‘Drivers and Mobile Plant Operators’, and ‘Laborers in Mining, Construction, Manufacturing and Transport’.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that certain occupations may be at a higher risk of BMC. Some fraction of BMC can be prevented by reducing exposure to hazardous agents used in these occupations. Further research is needed to identify which exposures are responsible for the increased risk. Moreover, tobacco control and early detection activities can be focused towards these occupations as tobacco consumption is also high in them, which may also be the reason for increased risk observed in these groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56322,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 102644"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupations and the risk of buccal mucosa cancer in Indian men: A multi-centre case-control study\",\"authors\":\"Romi Moirangthem , Bayan Hosseini , Aniket Patil , Grace Sarah George , Ankita Manjrekar , Pravin Doibale , Shruti Vishwas Golapkar , Nandkumar Panse , Manigreeva Krishnatreya , Aseem Mishra , Arjun Singh , Anil Chaturvedi , Pankaj Chaturvedi , Rajesh Dikshit , Ann Olsson , Sharayu Mhatre\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.canep.2024.102644\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the association between lifetime occupational history and risk of buccal mucosa cancer (BMC).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We utilized a multi-centric, hospital-based case-control study across five centres of Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. Cases included men aged 20–75-years with histological confirmed primary cancer of the buccal mucosa. Visitor controls were frequency matched to cases for age (10 years interval) and current residential zone. Study participants were interviewed face-to-face. Logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among ever employed males, we identified 1969 BMC cases and 2145 controls. We observed an increased risk of BMC in ‘Craft and Related Trades Workers’ (OR 1.37; 95 % CI 1.13–1.65), ‘Plant and Machine Operators and Assemblers’ (OR: 1.26; 95 % CI 1.01–1.56), and ‘Elementary Occupations’ (OR:1.33; 95 % CI 1.12–1.58). More specifically, the increased risk was observed for ‘Metal, Machinery and Related Trades Workers’, ‘Handicraft and Printing Workers’, ‘Drivers and Mobile Plant Operators’, and ‘Laborers in Mining, Construction, Manufacturing and Transport’.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that certain occupations may be at a higher risk of BMC. Some fraction of BMC can be prevented by reducing exposure to hazardous agents used in these occupations. Further research is needed to identify which exposures are responsible for the increased risk. Moreover, tobacco control and early detection activities can be focused towards these occupations as tobacco consumption is also high in them, which may also be the reason for increased risk observed in these groups.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\"92 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102644\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782124001231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877782124001231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Occupations and the risk of buccal mucosa cancer in Indian men: A multi-centre case-control study
Objective
This study aimed to investigate the association between lifetime occupational history and risk of buccal mucosa cancer (BMC).
Methods
We utilized a multi-centric, hospital-based case-control study across five centres of Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India. Cases included men aged 20–75-years with histological confirmed primary cancer of the buccal mucosa. Visitor controls were frequency matched to cases for age (10 years interval) and current residential zone. Study participants were interviewed face-to-face. Logistic regression was performed to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI).
Results
Among ever employed males, we identified 1969 BMC cases and 2145 controls. We observed an increased risk of BMC in ‘Craft and Related Trades Workers’ (OR 1.37; 95 % CI 1.13–1.65), ‘Plant and Machine Operators and Assemblers’ (OR: 1.26; 95 % CI 1.01–1.56), and ‘Elementary Occupations’ (OR:1.33; 95 % CI 1.12–1.58). More specifically, the increased risk was observed for ‘Metal, Machinery and Related Trades Workers’, ‘Handicraft and Printing Workers’, ‘Drivers and Mobile Plant Operators’, and ‘Laborers in Mining, Construction, Manufacturing and Transport’.
Conclusion
Our findings suggest that certain occupations may be at a higher risk of BMC. Some fraction of BMC can be prevented by reducing exposure to hazardous agents used in these occupations. Further research is needed to identify which exposures are responsible for the increased risk. Moreover, tobacco control and early detection activities can be focused towards these occupations as tobacco consumption is also high in them, which may also be the reason for increased risk observed in these groups.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Epidemiology is dedicated to increasing understanding about cancer causes, prevention and control. The scope of the journal embraces all aspects of cancer epidemiology including:
• Descriptive epidemiology
• Studies of risk factors for disease initiation, development and prognosis
• Screening and early detection
• Prevention and control
• Methodological issues
The journal publishes original research articles (full length and short reports), systematic reviews and meta-analyses, editorials, commentaries and letters to the editor commenting on previously published research.