微地理速度、可靠性和交通外部性

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics of Transportation Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ecotra.2024.100371
Ian Herzog
{"title":"微地理速度、可靠性和交通外部性","authors":"Ian Herzog","doi":"10.1016/j.ecotra.2024.100371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper estimates congestion externalities on a broad sample of roads in England’s capital region. A fixed effects approach that compares across times of day finds that 10% more traffic increases travel time by 4%, erodes reliability, and finds smallest marginal effects on high-capacity roads. I incorporate both expected travel time and reliability into a model of congestion externalities. Combining the model with travel data, I find that Central London’s Congestion Charge exceeds tolled drivers’ external costs if they only reflect travel time and reliability. Despite the large toll in London’s city centre, I find that deadweight loss in untolled parts of the city remains substantial, and that accounting for reliability increases deadweight loss by as much as 55%.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45761,"journal":{"name":"Economics of Transportation","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100371"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microgeographic speed, reliability, and traffic externalities\",\"authors\":\"Ian Herzog\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecotra.2024.100371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper estimates congestion externalities on a broad sample of roads in England’s capital region. A fixed effects approach that compares across times of day finds that 10% more traffic increases travel time by 4%, erodes reliability, and finds smallest marginal effects on high-capacity roads. I incorporate both expected travel time and reliability into a model of congestion externalities. Combining the model with travel data, I find that Central London’s Congestion Charge exceeds tolled drivers’ external costs if they only reflect travel time and reliability. Despite the large toll in London’s city centre, I find that deadweight loss in untolled parts of the city remains substantial, and that accounting for reliability increases deadweight loss by as much as 55%.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics of Transportation\",\"volume\":\"39 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics of Transportation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212012224000303\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics of Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212012224000303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对英格兰首都地区道路的广泛样本进行了拥堵外部性估算。采用固定效应法对一天中的不同时段进行比较后发现,交通流量增加 10%,旅行时间就会增加 4%,可靠性也会受到侵蚀,而对大容量道路的边际效应最小。我将预期旅行时间和可靠性都纳入了拥堵外部效应模型。将模型与出行数据相结合,我发现如果只反映出行时间和可靠性,伦敦市中心的拥堵费超过了收费司机的外部成本。尽管伦敦市中心的收费很高,但我发现城市中不收费地区的自重损失仍然很大,而考虑可靠性会使自重损失增加 55%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microgeographic speed, reliability, and traffic externalities

This paper estimates congestion externalities on a broad sample of roads in England’s capital region. A fixed effects approach that compares across times of day finds that 10% more traffic increases travel time by 4%, erodes reliability, and finds smallest marginal effects on high-capacity roads. I incorporate both expected travel time and reliability into a model of congestion externalities. Combining the model with travel data, I find that Central London’s Congestion Charge exceeds tolled drivers’ external costs if they only reflect travel time and reliability. Despite the large toll in London’s city centre, I find that deadweight loss in untolled parts of the city remains substantial, and that accounting for reliability increases deadweight loss by as much as 55%.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Free rides to cleaner air? Examining the impact of massive public transport fare discounts on air quality Unionised dockworkers and port ownership structure in an international oligopoly Editorial Board Microgeographic speed, reliability, and traffic externalities Pricing effects of code-sharing in Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1