坡屋顶和多跨屋顶建筑的风荷载:实地监测、风洞实验和设计规范条款之间的比较

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105864
Tsinuel N. Geleta , Girma Bitsuamlak , Mauricio Chavez , Appupillai Baskaran
{"title":"坡屋顶和多跨屋顶建筑的风荷载:实地监测、风洞实验和设计规范条款之间的比较","authors":"Tsinuel N. Geleta ,&nbsp;Girma Bitsuamlak ,&nbsp;Mauricio Chavez ,&nbsp;Appupillai Baskaran","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The wind loading provisions in the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) have not been updated for decades despite developments in wind tunnel methods since the original source data. This study aims to review the Nbcc 2020 provisions compared to wind tunnel experiments, field measurements, and the ASCE 7–22 provisions for single and multi-span gable roof buildings. Field measurements and wind tunnel tests are used to collect data for an isolated building and later for a multi-span gable. The pressure coefficients from the field measurements were mostly higher than the wind tunnel, which is consistent with previous studies. The results provided evidence that NBCC provisions for single-gabled roofs (with slope <span><math><mrow><msup><mn>7</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup><mo>&lt;</mo><mi>α</mi><mo>≤</mo><msup><mn>27</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span>) and multi-span gabled roofs (with slope <span><math><mrow><msup><mn>10</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup><mo>&lt;</mo><mi>α</mi><mo>≤</mo><msup><mn>30</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span>) are currently underestimated. New provisions are suggested for the corner (c), edge (s), and field (r) zones of the single-span gabled roof and for gable-end-edge (s’) zone of the multi-span. It is suggested to merge Zone s into Zone c to form a new perimeter Zone p for the single gabled roof and to merge Zone s’ into Zone c for the multi-span gabled roof. The proposed changes correct the current provision underestimation and add simplicity for easier construction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 105864"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wind loading on gable and multi-span roof buildings: Comparison between field monitoring, wind tunnel experiments, and design code provisions\",\"authors\":\"Tsinuel N. Geleta ,&nbsp;Girma Bitsuamlak ,&nbsp;Mauricio Chavez ,&nbsp;Appupillai Baskaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The wind loading provisions in the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) have not been updated for decades despite developments in wind tunnel methods since the original source data. This study aims to review the Nbcc 2020 provisions compared to wind tunnel experiments, field measurements, and the ASCE 7–22 provisions for single and multi-span gable roof buildings. Field measurements and wind tunnel tests are used to collect data for an isolated building and later for a multi-span gable. The pressure coefficients from the field measurements were mostly higher than the wind tunnel, which is consistent with previous studies. The results provided evidence that NBCC provisions for single-gabled roofs (with slope <span><math><mrow><msup><mn>7</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup><mo>&lt;</mo><mi>α</mi><mo>≤</mo><msup><mn>27</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span>) and multi-span gabled roofs (with slope <span><math><mrow><msup><mn>10</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup><mo>&lt;</mo><mi>α</mi><mo>≤</mo><msup><mn>30</mn><mo>∘</mo></msup></mrow></math></span>) are currently underestimated. New provisions are suggested for the corner (c), edge (s), and field (r) zones of the single-span gabled roof and for gable-end-edge (s’) zone of the multi-span. It is suggested to merge Zone s into Zone c to form a new perimeter Zone p for the single gabled roof and to merge Zone s’ into Zone c for the multi-span gabled roof. The proposed changes correct the current provision underestimation and add simplicity for easier construction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"volume\":\"253 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105864\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002277\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002277","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加拿大国家建筑规范》(NBCC)中的风荷载规定已有数十年未更新,尽管自最初的原始数据发布以来,风洞方法有了很大发展。本研究旨在审查 Nbcc 2020 条款与风洞实验、现场测量和 ASCE 7-22 条款对单跨和多跨坡顶建筑的影响。实地测量和风洞试验用于收集孤立建筑的数据,随后又用于收集多跨屋面的数据。实地测量得出的压力系数大多高于风洞试验得出的系数,这与之前的研究结果一致。结果证明,目前对单坡顶(坡度为 7∘<α≤27∘)和多跨坡顶(坡度为 10∘<α≤30∘)的 NBCC 规定估计不足。建议对单跨坡顶的角(c)区、边(s)区和场(r)区以及多跨坡顶的檐端边(s')区做出新的规定。建议将 s 区并入 c 区,形成单跨坡屋顶的新周边 p 区,并将 s' 区并入多跨坡屋顶的 c 区。建议的修改纠正了当前规定的低估,并使施工更加简便。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Wind loading on gable and multi-span roof buildings: Comparison between field monitoring, wind tunnel experiments, and design code provisions

The wind loading provisions in the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC) have not been updated for decades despite developments in wind tunnel methods since the original source data. This study aims to review the Nbcc 2020 provisions compared to wind tunnel experiments, field measurements, and the ASCE 7–22 provisions for single and multi-span gable roof buildings. Field measurements and wind tunnel tests are used to collect data for an isolated building and later for a multi-span gable. The pressure coefficients from the field measurements were mostly higher than the wind tunnel, which is consistent with previous studies. The results provided evidence that NBCC provisions for single-gabled roofs (with slope 7<α27) and multi-span gabled roofs (with slope 10<α30) are currently underestimated. New provisions are suggested for the corner (c), edge (s), and field (r) zones of the single-span gabled roof and for gable-end-edge (s’) zone of the multi-span. It is suggested to merge Zone s into Zone c to form a new perimeter Zone p for the single gabled roof and to merge Zone s’ into Zone c for the multi-span gabled roof. The proposed changes correct the current provision underestimation and add simplicity for easier construction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
期刊最新文献
Evaluating different categories of turbulence models for calculating air pollutant dispersion in street canyons with generic and real urban layouts Numerical simulation and experimental study of the effects of retaining block structures on wavefront steepening in rail tunnels A wake prediction framework based on the MOST Gaussian wake model and a deep learning approach Advanced statistical analysis of vortex-induced vibrations in suspension bridge hangers with and without Stockbridge dampers Converting dependence of extreme wind pressure coefficients across different epochs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1