Claus Bachert, Asif H Khan, Wytske J Fokkens, Claire Hopkins, Philippe Gevaert, Joseph K Han, Peter W Hellings, Stella E Lee, Jérôme Msihid, Scott Nash, Harry Sacks, Juby A Jacob-Nara, Yamo Deniz, Paul J Rowe
{"title":"杜匹单抗在重度 CRSwNP 患者中的起效、维持和持久性。","authors":"Claus Bachert, Asif H Khan, Wytske J Fokkens, Claire Hopkins, Philippe Gevaert, Joseph K Han, Peter W Hellings, Stella E Lee, Jérôme Msihid, Scott Nash, Harry Sacks, Juby A Jacob-Nara, Yamo Deniz, Paul J Rowe","doi":"10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Responder analyses of SINUS phase 3 study data have shown clinically meaningful improvements across multiple outcomes of treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with dupilumab.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim was to gain a better understanding of dynamics of the response to dupilumab over 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the SINUS-52 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02898454) intention-to-treat population to perform a post hoc analysis of patients with severe CRSwNP who had received dupilumab, 300 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo. Response, which was defined as an improvement from baseline of a least 1 point in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), nasal congestion (NC) score, and loss of smell (LoS) score, as well as an improvement of at least 8.9 points on the 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), was assessed for rapidity, maintenance, and durability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 303 patients (150 of whom received dupilumab and 153 of whom received placebo). For each outcome measure, a greater proportion of patients achieved a first response by week 16 (rapidity) with dupilumab versus with placebo; specifically, the respective differences in indicators between the 2 groups by week 16 were as follows: NPS, 75.3% versus 39.2%; NC score, 60.0% versus 24.2%; LoS score, 60.7% versus 15.7%; and SNOT-22 score, 83.3% versus 66.0%. Of those patients given dupilumab who had a response by week 16, more than 80% maintained their response at week 52 (maintenance). Over 52 weeks, greater proportions of those patients given dupilumab were responders on at least 80% of time points; specifically, the respective differences in indicators between the 2 groups by week 16 were as follows: NPS, 46.7% versus 2.6%; NC score, 46.7% versus 9.2%; LoS score, 47.3% versus 3.9%; and SNOT-22 score, 62.0% versus 21.6% (durability).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients with CRSwNP achieve clinically meaningful responses to dupilumab by week 16, and most such patients in our study had maintenance and durability of response with continued treatment over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":14936,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":11.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dupilumab response onset, maintenance, and durability in patients with severe CRSwNP.\",\"authors\":\"Claus Bachert, Asif H Khan, Wytske J Fokkens, Claire Hopkins, Philippe Gevaert, Joseph K Han, Peter W Hellings, Stella E Lee, Jérôme Msihid, Scott Nash, Harry Sacks, Juby A Jacob-Nara, Yamo Deniz, Paul J Rowe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Responder analyses of SINUS phase 3 study data have shown clinically meaningful improvements across multiple outcomes of treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with dupilumab.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our aim was to gain a better understanding of dynamics of the response to dupilumab over 52 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the SINUS-52 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02898454) intention-to-treat population to perform a post hoc analysis of patients with severe CRSwNP who had received dupilumab, 300 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo. Response, which was defined as an improvement from baseline of a least 1 point in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), nasal congestion (NC) score, and loss of smell (LoS) score, as well as an improvement of at least 8.9 points on the 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), was assessed for rapidity, maintenance, and durability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 303 patients (150 of whom received dupilumab and 153 of whom received placebo). For each outcome measure, a greater proportion of patients achieved a first response by week 16 (rapidity) with dupilumab versus with placebo; specifically, the respective differences in indicators between the 2 groups by week 16 were as follows: NPS, 75.3% versus 39.2%; NC score, 60.0% versus 24.2%; LoS score, 60.7% versus 15.7%; and SNOT-22 score, 83.3% versus 66.0%. Of those patients given dupilumab who had a response by week 16, more than 80% maintained their response at week 52 (maintenance). Over 52 weeks, greater proportions of those patients given dupilumab were responders on at least 80% of time points; specifically, the respective differences in indicators between the 2 groups by week 16 were as follows: NPS, 46.7% versus 2.6%; NC score, 46.7% versus 9.2%; LoS score, 47.3% versus 3.9%; and SNOT-22 score, 62.0% versus 21.6% (durability).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most patients with CRSwNP achieve clinically meaningful responses to dupilumab by week 16, and most such patients in our study had maintenance and durability of response with continued treatment over time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.026\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2024.07.026","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:对SINUS 3期研究数据进行的应答者分析表明,使用dupilumab后,慢性鼻炎伴鼻息肉(CRSwNP)的多种疗效均得到了有临床意义的改善:更好地了解杜必鲁单抗 52 周内的反应动态:方法:利用 SINUS-52 (NCT02898454) 意向治疗人群的数据进行事后分析,研究对象为接受杜必鲁单抗 300 毫克、每两周一次 (q2w) 或安慰剂治疗的严重 CRSwNP 患者。反应的定义是鼻息肉评分(NPS)、鼻塞(NC)和嗅觉减退(LoS)与基线相比改善≥1分,22项鼻功能测试(SNOT-22)改善≥8.9分,并对反应的快速性、维持性和持久性进行评估:共纳入 303 名患者(杜匹单抗,n = 150;安慰剂,n = 153)。在各项结果指标中,使用杜比单抗与安慰剂相比,在第16周(快速性)之前获得首次应答的患者比例更高:NPS,75.3% vs 39.2%;NC,60.0% vs 24.2%;LoS,60.7% vs 15.7%;SNOT-22,83.3% vs 66.0%。在第 16 周出现应答的杜比鲁单抗患者中,超过 80% 的患者在第 52 周(维持期)保持了应答。在52周内,更多的杜匹单抗患者在≥80%的时间点有应答:NPS,46.7% vs 2.6%;NC,46.7% vs 9.2%;LoS,47.3% vs 3.9%;SNOT-22,62.0% vs 21.6%(耐久性):结论:大多数 CRSwNP 患者在第 16 周前对杜匹单抗产生了有临床意义的反应,其中大多数患者的反应在持续治疗后得到了维持和持久。
Dupilumab response onset, maintenance, and durability in patients with severe CRSwNP.
Background: Responder analyses of SINUS phase 3 study data have shown clinically meaningful improvements across multiple outcomes of treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) with dupilumab.
Objective: Our aim was to gain a better understanding of dynamics of the response to dupilumab over 52 weeks.
Methods: We used data from the SINUS-52 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02898454) intention-to-treat population to perform a post hoc analysis of patients with severe CRSwNP who had received dupilumab, 300 mg once every 2 weeks, or placebo. Response, which was defined as an improvement from baseline of a least 1 point in Nasal Polyp Score (NPS), nasal congestion (NC) score, and loss of smell (LoS) score, as well as an improvement of at least 8.9 points on the 22-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22), was assessed for rapidity, maintenance, and durability.
Results: The study included 303 patients (150 of whom received dupilumab and 153 of whom received placebo). For each outcome measure, a greater proportion of patients achieved a first response by week 16 (rapidity) with dupilumab versus with placebo; specifically, the respective differences in indicators between the 2 groups by week 16 were as follows: NPS, 75.3% versus 39.2%; NC score, 60.0% versus 24.2%; LoS score, 60.7% versus 15.7%; and SNOT-22 score, 83.3% versus 66.0%. Of those patients given dupilumab who had a response by week 16, more than 80% maintained their response at week 52 (maintenance). Over 52 weeks, greater proportions of those patients given dupilumab were responders on at least 80% of time points; specifically, the respective differences in indicators between the 2 groups by week 16 were as follows: NPS, 46.7% versus 2.6%; NC score, 46.7% versus 9.2%; LoS score, 47.3% versus 3.9%; and SNOT-22 score, 62.0% versus 21.6% (durability).
Conclusion: Most patients with CRSwNP achieve clinically meaningful responses to dupilumab by week 16, and most such patients in our study had maintenance and durability of response with continued treatment over time.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology is a prestigious publication that features groundbreaking research in the fields of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. This influential journal publishes high-impact research papers that explore various topics, including asthma, food allergy, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, primary immune deficiencies, occupational and environmental allergy, and other allergic and immunologic diseases. The articles not only report on clinical trials and mechanistic studies but also provide insights into novel therapies, underlying mechanisms, and important discoveries that contribute to our understanding of these diseases. By sharing this valuable information, the journal aims to enhance the diagnosis and management of patients in the future.