作为教育水平预测因素的父母社会经济地位和家庭支持:测试努力控制和同伴支持的缓冲作用。

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Adolescence Pub Date : 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1002/jad.12389
Matthijs Fakkel, Margot Peeters, Susan Branje, Gonneke W J M Stevens
{"title":"作为教育水平预测因素的父母社会经济地位和家庭支持:测试努力控制和同伴支持的缓冲作用。","authors":"Matthijs Fakkel, Margot Peeters, Susan Branje, Gonneke W J M Stevens","doi":"10.1002/jad.12389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exposure to family risk factors increases adolescents' chances of attaining a lower educational level. However, some adolescents attain a high educational level despite being exposed to family risk factors such as a lower parental socioeconomic status (SES) or receiving less family support.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using data from the Dutch TRAILS cohort study (N<sub>T1</sub> = 2175; M<sub>age</sub> = 11.1, SD = 0.55, 50.8% female), we investigated if higher levels of effortful control and peer support can buffer against the negative effects of a lower parental SES and less family support on educational level. Two multinomial logistic regressions were performed (from early to mid-adolescence and from mid-adolescence to young adulthood) with post hoc tests to contrast four ordinal educational levels: practical vocational, theoretical vocational, higher general, and (pre-)university.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adolescents with a higher parental SES were consistently more likely to end up at a higher educational level, but family support was hardly associated with educational level. Neither effortful control nor peer support buffered the associations of parental SES and family support with educational level. Effortful control did have a positive direct (compensatory) effect on the educational level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that other individual competencies or more structural changes may be more helpful buffers for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in educational attainment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescence","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parental SES and family support as predictors of educational level: Testing the buffering effect of effortful control and peer support.\",\"authors\":\"Matthijs Fakkel, Margot Peeters, Susan Branje, Gonneke W J M Stevens\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jad.12389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Exposure to family risk factors increases adolescents' chances of attaining a lower educational level. However, some adolescents attain a high educational level despite being exposed to family risk factors such as a lower parental socioeconomic status (SES) or receiving less family support.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using data from the Dutch TRAILS cohort study (N<sub>T1</sub> = 2175; M<sub>age</sub> = 11.1, SD = 0.55, 50.8% female), we investigated if higher levels of effortful control and peer support can buffer against the negative effects of a lower parental SES and less family support on educational level. Two multinomial logistic regressions were performed (from early to mid-adolescence and from mid-adolescence to young adulthood) with post hoc tests to contrast four ordinal educational levels: practical vocational, theoretical vocational, higher general, and (pre-)university.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adolescents with a higher parental SES were consistently more likely to end up at a higher educational level, but family support was hardly associated with educational level. Neither effortful control nor peer support buffered the associations of parental SES and family support with educational level. Effortful control did have a positive direct (compensatory) effect on the educational level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that other individual competencies or more structural changes may be more helpful buffers for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in educational attainment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescence\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12389\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介受到家庭风险因素的影响,青少年受教育水平较低的几率会增加。然而,有些青少年尽管面临家庭风险因素,如父母社会经济地位(SES)较低或获得的家庭支持较少,但仍能达到较高的教育水平:我们利用荷兰 TRAILS 队列研究(NT1 = 2175;Mage = 11.1,SD = 0.55,50.8% 为女性)的数据,研究了较高水平的努力控制和同伴支持能否缓冲较低的父母社会经济地位和较少的家庭支持对教育水平的负面影响。我们进行了两次多项式逻辑回归(从青春期早期到中期和从青春期中期到青年期),并进行了事后检验,以对比四个序数教育水平:实用职业教育、理论职业教育、高等普通教育和(大学预科)教育:结果发现:父母社会经济地位越高的青少年越有可能最终达到较高的教育水平,但家庭支持与教育水平几乎没有关系。努力控制和同伴支持都不能缓冲父母社会经济地位和家庭支持与教育水平之间的关系。努力控制确实对教育水平有直接(补偿)的积极影响:我们得出的结论是,其他个人能力或更多的结构性变化可能对减少教育程度方面的社会经济不平等更有帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parental SES and family support as predictors of educational level: Testing the buffering effect of effortful control and peer support.

Introduction: Exposure to family risk factors increases adolescents' chances of attaining a lower educational level. However, some adolescents attain a high educational level despite being exposed to family risk factors such as a lower parental socioeconomic status (SES) or receiving less family support.

Method: Using data from the Dutch TRAILS cohort study (NT1 = 2175; Mage = 11.1, SD = 0.55, 50.8% female), we investigated if higher levels of effortful control and peer support can buffer against the negative effects of a lower parental SES and less family support on educational level. Two multinomial logistic regressions were performed (from early to mid-adolescence and from mid-adolescence to young adulthood) with post hoc tests to contrast four ordinal educational levels: practical vocational, theoretical vocational, higher general, and (pre-)university.

Results: Adolescents with a higher parental SES were consistently more likely to end up at a higher educational level, but family support was hardly associated with educational level. Neither effortful control nor peer support buffered the associations of parental SES and family support with educational level. Effortful control did have a positive direct (compensatory) effect on the educational level.

Conclusion: We conclude that other individual competencies or more structural changes may be more helpful buffers for reducing socioeconomic inequalities in educational attainment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Adolescence
Journal of Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: The Journal of Adolescence is an international, broad based, cross-disciplinary journal that addresses issues of professional and academic importance concerning development between puberty and the attainment of adult status within society. It provides a forum for all who are concerned with the nature of adolescence, whether involved in teaching, research, guidance, counseling, treatment, or other services. The aim of the journal is to encourage research and foster good practice through publishing both empirical and clinical studies as well as integrative reviews and theoretical advances.
期刊最新文献
Adolescents' meaning making of salient emotional experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gender messages in girls' puberty books: A focus on parent representation. Put at and kept from risk: The sexual risk dilemmas confronting marginalized youth. Pants on fire: Risks for and outcomes of atypical lying. The links between parenting, self-esteem, and depressive symptoms: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1