Renée van Dinter, Michiel F Reneman, Marcel W M Post
{"title":"脊髓损伤者的工作时间、工作控制、工作压力和生活质量之间的关系。","authors":"Renée van Dinter, Michiel F Reneman, Marcel W M Post","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work participation is related to a better quality of life (QoL) for people with spinal cord injury (SCI), however, the specific work characteristics that are related to QoL in people with SCI are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate which work characteristics are related to QoL in people with SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey of people with SCI in the Netherlands. The survey consisted of demographic, SCI-related, and work-related items. Work control was measured with the short Job Content Questionnaire and work stress with the effort-reward imbalance (ERI). People of working age with at least 1 h of paid work per week were included. Hierarchical regression analysis was performed to examine the contribution of work characteristics to QoL while controlling for potential clinical and demographic confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 169 persons with SCI (74.6 % male, 47.8 ± 9.3 years, time since injury 18.9 ± 11.1 years). The final hierarchical regression model explained 31 % of the variance in QoL. The number of SCI-related health complications contributed the strongest to QoL (ß = -.36), followed by work hours (β = .24), and work stress (β = .24). However, work control did not contribute significantly to QoL in our final model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Work hours and work stress contributed to QoL in people with SCI, but the number of SCI-related health complications was the strongest contributor. Future research and vocational rehabilitation should be directed to both medical and work-related variables to enhance the QoL of working people with SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101682"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relation between work hours, work control, work stress, and quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury.\",\"authors\":\"Renée van Dinter, Michiel F Reneman, Marcel W M Post\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Work participation is related to a better quality of life (QoL) for people with spinal cord injury (SCI), however, the specific work characteristics that are related to QoL in people with SCI are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate which work characteristics are related to QoL in people with SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional survey of people with SCI in the Netherlands. The survey consisted of demographic, SCI-related, and work-related items. Work control was measured with the short Job Content Questionnaire and work stress with the effort-reward imbalance (ERI). People of working age with at least 1 h of paid work per week were included. Hierarchical regression analysis was performed to examine the contribution of work characteristics to QoL while controlling for potential clinical and demographic confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 169 persons with SCI (74.6 % male, 47.8 ± 9.3 years, time since injury 18.9 ± 11.1 years). The final hierarchical regression model explained 31 % of the variance in QoL. The number of SCI-related health complications contributed the strongest to QoL (ß = -.36), followed by work hours (β = .24), and work stress (β = .24). However, work control did not contribute significantly to QoL in our final model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Work hours and work stress contributed to QoL in people with SCI, but the number of SCI-related health complications was the strongest contributor. Future research and vocational rehabilitation should be directed to both medical and work-related variables to enhance the QoL of working people with SCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101682\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101682","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:参与工作与脊髓损伤(SCI)患者更好的生活质量(QoL)有关,然而,与SCI患者QoL有关的具体工作特征在很大程度上是未知的:调查哪些工作特征与 SCI 患者的 QoL 有关:方法:对荷兰的 SCI 患者进行横断面调查。调查包括人口统计学、SCI 相关和工作相关项目。工作控制通过简短的工作内容问卷进行测量,工作压力通过努力-回报不平衡(ERI)进行测量。调查对象包括每周至少从事 1 小时有偿工作的适龄劳动者。在控制潜在的临床和人口统计学混杂因素的同时,进行了层次回归分析,以研究工作特征对 QoL 的影响:研究共纳入 169 名 SCI 患者(74.6% 为男性,47.8 ± 9.3 岁,受伤后 18.9 ± 11.1 年)。最终的分层回归模型解释了 QoL 变异的 31%。与 SCI 相关的健康并发症数量对 QoL 的影响最大(ß = -.36),其次是工作时间(β = .24)和工作压力(β = .24)。然而,在我们的最终模型中,工作控制对 QoL 的影响并不大:结论:工作时间和工作压力对 SCI 患者的 QoL 有影响,但 SCI 相关健康并发症的数量对 QoL 的影响最大。未来的研究和职业康复应针对医疗和工作相关变量,以提高工作的 SCI 患者的 QoL。
Relation between work hours, work control, work stress, and quality of life in persons with spinal cord injury.
Background: Work participation is related to a better quality of life (QoL) for people with spinal cord injury (SCI), however, the specific work characteristics that are related to QoL in people with SCI are largely unknown.
Objectives: To investigate which work characteristics are related to QoL in people with SCI.
Methods: Cross-sectional survey of people with SCI in the Netherlands. The survey consisted of demographic, SCI-related, and work-related items. Work control was measured with the short Job Content Questionnaire and work stress with the effort-reward imbalance (ERI). People of working age with at least 1 h of paid work per week were included. Hierarchical regression analysis was performed to examine the contribution of work characteristics to QoL while controlling for potential clinical and demographic confounders.
Results: The study included 169 persons with SCI (74.6 % male, 47.8 ± 9.3 years, time since injury 18.9 ± 11.1 years). The final hierarchical regression model explained 31 % of the variance in QoL. The number of SCI-related health complications contributed the strongest to QoL (ß = -.36), followed by work hours (β = .24), and work stress (β = .24). However, work control did not contribute significantly to QoL in our final model.
Conclusion: Work hours and work stress contributed to QoL in people with SCI, but the number of SCI-related health complications was the strongest contributor. Future research and vocational rehabilitation should be directed to both medical and work-related variables to enhance the QoL of working people with SCI.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include:
• Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health
• Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature
• Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs
• Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.