Laura A. Payne Ph.D. , Laura C. Seidman , Steven W. Granger Ph.D. , Alison Edelman M.D., M.P.H. , Boyu Ren Ph.D.
{"title":"关于接种 COVID-19 疫苗与少女月经周期特征关系的前瞻性研究。","authors":"Laura A. Payne Ph.D. , Laura C. Seidman , Steven W. Granger Ph.D. , Alison Edelman M.D., M.P.H. , Boyu Ren Ph.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.06.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The current study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 booster vaccine on menstrual cycle characteristics in adolescent girls (aged 13–20) compared to those who did not receive a booster vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective study measured menstrual cycle length for three cycles prior to and four cycles after vaccination (booster group), seven cycles without vaccination (control group). Menstrual flow, menstrual pain, and menstrual symptoms were assessed at baseline and monthly for 3 months. Stress was assessed at baseline using the PROMIS Pediatric Psychological Stress Experiences scale. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to examine the changes in menstrual characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>65 adolescent girls (47 booster; 18 control) were recruited via social media and from ongoing studies in the United States. Girls in the booster group experienced shorter postbooster cycles by an average 5.35 days (<em>p</em> = .03) compared to prebooster cycle lengths, specifically in the second postbooster cycle, while the control group did not show any changes in cycle length pre-to postbooster. Participants who received the booster in the follicular phase had shorter mean postbooster cycle length (<em>p</em> = .0157) compared to their prebooster cycle length. Higher stress was associated with shorter cycles (<em>p</em> = .03) and increased menstrual symptoms (<em>p</em> = <.001), regardless of group. There were no differences in menstrual flow, menstrual pain, or menstrual symptoms in either group.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The COVID-19 booster vaccine was associated with shorter cycles in adolescent girls. These data demonstrate the need for further investigation regarding potential mechanisms of these observed changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56278,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adolescent Health","volume":"75 5","pages":"Pages 819-826"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Prospective Study of the Relationship of COVID-19 Vaccination to Menstrual Cycle Characteristics in Adolescent Girls\",\"authors\":\"Laura A. Payne Ph.D. , Laura C. Seidman , Steven W. Granger Ph.D. , Alison Edelman M.D., M.P.H. , Boyu Ren Ph.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.06.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The current study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 booster vaccine on menstrual cycle characteristics in adolescent girls (aged 13–20) compared to those who did not receive a booster vaccine.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective study measured menstrual cycle length for three cycles prior to and four cycles after vaccination (booster group), seven cycles without vaccination (control group). Menstrual flow, menstrual pain, and menstrual symptoms were assessed at baseline and monthly for 3 months. Stress was assessed at baseline using the PROMIS Pediatric Psychological Stress Experiences scale. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to examine the changes in menstrual characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>65 adolescent girls (47 booster; 18 control) were recruited via social media and from ongoing studies in the United States. Girls in the booster group experienced shorter postbooster cycles by an average 5.35 days (<em>p</em> = .03) compared to prebooster cycle lengths, specifically in the second postbooster cycle, while the control group did not show any changes in cycle length pre-to postbooster. Participants who received the booster in the follicular phase had shorter mean postbooster cycle length (<em>p</em> = .0157) compared to their prebooster cycle length. Higher stress was associated with shorter cycles (<em>p</em> = .03) and increased menstrual symptoms (<em>p</em> = <.001), regardless of group. There were no differences in menstrual flow, menstrual pain, or menstrual symptoms in either group.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The COVID-19 booster vaccine was associated with shorter cycles in adolescent girls. These data demonstrate the need for further investigation regarding potential mechanisms of these observed changes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56278,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Adolescent Health\",\"volume\":\"75 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 819-826\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Adolescent Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X24003070\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adolescent Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X24003070","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Prospective Study of the Relationship of COVID-19 Vaccination to Menstrual Cycle Characteristics in Adolescent Girls
Purpose
The current study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 booster vaccine on menstrual cycle characteristics in adolescent girls (aged 13–20) compared to those who did not receive a booster vaccine.
Methods
This prospective study measured menstrual cycle length for three cycles prior to and four cycles after vaccination (booster group), seven cycles without vaccination (control group). Menstrual flow, menstrual pain, and menstrual symptoms were assessed at baseline and monthly for 3 months. Stress was assessed at baseline using the PROMIS Pediatric Psychological Stress Experiences scale. Generalized linear mixed effects models were used to examine the changes in menstrual characteristics.
Results
65 adolescent girls (47 booster; 18 control) were recruited via social media and from ongoing studies in the United States. Girls in the booster group experienced shorter postbooster cycles by an average 5.35 days (p = .03) compared to prebooster cycle lengths, specifically in the second postbooster cycle, while the control group did not show any changes in cycle length pre-to postbooster. Participants who received the booster in the follicular phase had shorter mean postbooster cycle length (p = .0157) compared to their prebooster cycle length. Higher stress was associated with shorter cycles (p = .03) and increased menstrual symptoms (p = <.001), regardless of group. There were no differences in menstrual flow, menstrual pain, or menstrual symptoms in either group.
Discussion
The COVID-19 booster vaccine was associated with shorter cycles in adolescent girls. These data demonstrate the need for further investigation regarding potential mechanisms of these observed changes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Adolescent Health is a scientific publication dedicated to enhancing the health and well-being of adolescents and young adults. Our Journal covers a broad range of research topics, spanning from the basic biological and behavioral sciences to public health and policy. We welcome a variety of contributions, including original research papers, concise reports, literature reviews, clinical case reports, opinion pieces, and letters to the editor. We encourage professionals from diverse disciplines such as Anthropology, Education, Ethics, Global Health, Health Services Research, Law, Medicine, Mental and Behavioral Health, Nursing, Nutrition, Psychology, Public Health and Policy, Social Work, Sociology, and Youth Development to share their expertise and contribute to our mission of promoting adolescent health. Moreover, we value the voices of young individuals, family and community members, and healthcare professionals, and encourage them to submit poetry, personal narratives, images, and other creative works that provide unique insights into the experiences of adolescents and young adults. By combining scientific peer-reviewed research with creative expressions, our Journal aims to create a comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in adolescent and young adult health.