不明确和假定无菌髋关节和膝关节翻修关节置换术中意外的术中培养阳性结果的发生率、风险因素、微生物学结果和临床结果 - 一项至少随访两年的十年回顾性分析

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Translation Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jot.2024.08.002
Sebastian Simon , Luca Martalanz , Bernhard J.H. Frank , Susana Gardete Hartmann , Jennyfer A. Mitterer , Sujeesh Sebastian , Stephanie Huber , Jochen G. Hofstaetter
{"title":"不明确和假定无菌髋关节和膝关节翻修关节置换术中意外的术中培养阳性结果的发生率、风险因素、微生物学结果和临床结果 - 一项至少随访两年的十年回顾性分析","authors":"Sebastian Simon ,&nbsp;Luca Martalanz ,&nbsp;Bernhard J.H. Frank ,&nbsp;Susana Gardete Hartmann ,&nbsp;Jennyfer A. Mitterer ,&nbsp;Sujeesh Sebastian ,&nbsp;Stephanie Huber ,&nbsp;Jochen G. Hofstaetter","doi":"10.1016/j.jot.2024.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, microbiological spectrum, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) in presumed aseptic and unclear revision-total-hip-/knee-arthroplasties (rTHA and rTKA) compared to culture-negative (CN) revisions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study reviewed all International-consensus-meeting-2018 (ICM 2018) negative or inconclusive rTHA (n = 751) and rTKA (n = 679) performed at our institution from 2011 to 2020 with a minimum follow-up of two years. A Kaplan-Meier-analysis was performed to determine the septic and aseptic-free implant survival in cases with UPIC's and matched culture-negative cases. Patient demographics, risk factors, microbiological spectrum and clinical outcomes were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were significantly more UPIC cases in rTHA 196/751 (26.1 %) compared to rTKA 113/679 (16.6 %); (p &lt; 0.001). UPICs in rTKA and rTHA have a lower septic and aseptic implant-free-survival compared to CN revisions. Patients with a history of nickel allergy have a higher risk of an UPIC in rTHA and rTKA (p &lt; 0.001). Septic re-revisions after UPIC had a significantly (H: p = 0.004; K: p = 0.030) shorter time period to the primary/previous surgery (H: 84 (IQR:41–797); K: 115 (IQR:55–446)) compared to patients with aseptic re-revisions after UPIC (H:1248 (IQR:178-3534); K: 827 (IQR:361-1183)).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>UPICs have a higher rate of septic and aseptic failure than CN outcomes. UPICs are twice as common in rTHA compared to rTKA. Preoperative PJI workup reduces the UPIC rate. Nickel allergy is a risk factor for UPIC. Early revisions with UPICs after primary THA or TKA have a higher risk of septic failure.</p></div><div><h3>The translational potential of this article</h3><p>This article provides new information on revision rates for UPIC and potential risk factors for UPIC and its treatment failure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Translation","volume":"48 ","pages":"Pages 156-162"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X24000895/pdfft?md5=60db224076b882de5a10e78430714624&pid=1-s2.0-S2214031X24000895-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence, risk factors, microbiological results and clinical outcome in unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in unclear and presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties – A ten-year retrospective analysis with a minimum follow up of 2 years\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Simon ,&nbsp;Luca Martalanz ,&nbsp;Bernhard J.H. Frank ,&nbsp;Susana Gardete Hartmann ,&nbsp;Jennyfer A. Mitterer ,&nbsp;Sujeesh Sebastian ,&nbsp;Stephanie Huber ,&nbsp;Jochen G. Hofstaetter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jot.2024.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, microbiological spectrum, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) in presumed aseptic and unclear revision-total-hip-/knee-arthroplasties (rTHA and rTKA) compared to culture-negative (CN) revisions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study reviewed all International-consensus-meeting-2018 (ICM 2018) negative or inconclusive rTHA (n = 751) and rTKA (n = 679) performed at our institution from 2011 to 2020 with a minimum follow-up of two years. A Kaplan-Meier-analysis was performed to determine the septic and aseptic-free implant survival in cases with UPIC's and matched culture-negative cases. Patient demographics, risk factors, microbiological spectrum and clinical outcomes were evaluated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were significantly more UPIC cases in rTHA 196/751 (26.1 %) compared to rTKA 113/679 (16.6 %); (p &lt; 0.001). UPICs in rTKA and rTHA have a lower septic and aseptic implant-free-survival compared to CN revisions. Patients with a history of nickel allergy have a higher risk of an UPIC in rTHA and rTKA (p &lt; 0.001). Septic re-revisions after UPIC had a significantly (H: p = 0.004; K: p = 0.030) shorter time period to the primary/previous surgery (H: 84 (IQR:41–797); K: 115 (IQR:55–446)) compared to patients with aseptic re-revisions after UPIC (H:1248 (IQR:178-3534); K: 827 (IQR:361-1183)).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>UPICs have a higher rate of septic and aseptic failure than CN outcomes. UPICs are twice as common in rTHA compared to rTKA. Preoperative PJI workup reduces the UPIC rate. Nickel allergy is a risk factor for UPIC. Early revisions with UPICs after primary THA or TKA have a higher risk of septic failure.</p></div><div><h3>The translational potential of this article</h3><p>This article provides new information on revision rates for UPIC and potential risk factors for UPIC and its treatment failure.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Translation\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 156-162\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X24000895/pdfft?md5=60db224076b882de5a10e78430714624&pid=1-s2.0-S2214031X24000895-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Translation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X24000895\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Translation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214031X24000895","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景本研究旨在评估与培养阴性(CN)翻修相比,假定无菌和不明确的翻修全髋/膝关节置换术(rTHA 和 rTKA)中意外阳性术中培养(UPIC)的发生率、微生物谱、风险因素和临床结局。方法本研究回顾了 2011 年至 2020 年在我院进行的所有培养阴性或不明确的 rTHA(n = 751)和 rTKA(n = 679),随访时间至少两年。我们采用卡普兰-梅耶尔分析法确定了UPIC病例和相匹配的培养阴性病例的败血症和无菌植入存活率。结果与 rTKA 的 113/679 例(16.6%)相比,rTHA 的 UPIC 例数明显更多,为 196/751 例(26.1%);(p <0.001)。与CN翻修相比,rTKA和rTHA的UPIC化脓性和无菌植入物存活率较低。有镍过敏史的患者在rTHA和rTKA中发生UPIC的风险更高(p < 0.001)。与UPIC术后无菌性再次翻修的患者相比,UPIC术后化脓性再次翻修的患者距离初次/前次手术的时间明显较短(H:p = 0.004;K:p = 0.030)(H:84(IQR:41-797);K:115(IQR:55-446))(H:1248(IQR:178-3534);K:827(IQR:361-1183))。结论UPIC的脓毒性和无菌性失败率高于CN结果。与 rTKA 相比,UPIC 在 rTHA 中的发生率是后者的两倍。术前PJI检查可降低UPIC发生率。镍过敏是UPIC的一个风险因素。本文的转化潜力本文就UPIC的翻修率和UPIC及其治疗失败的潜在风险因素提供了新的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence, risk factors, microbiological results and clinical outcome in unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in unclear and presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties – A ten-year retrospective analysis with a minimum follow up of 2 years

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, microbiological spectrum, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) in presumed aseptic and unclear revision-total-hip-/knee-arthroplasties (rTHA and rTKA) compared to culture-negative (CN) revisions.

Methods

This study reviewed all International-consensus-meeting-2018 (ICM 2018) negative or inconclusive rTHA (n = 751) and rTKA (n = 679) performed at our institution from 2011 to 2020 with a minimum follow-up of two years. A Kaplan-Meier-analysis was performed to determine the septic and aseptic-free implant survival in cases with UPIC's and matched culture-negative cases. Patient demographics, risk factors, microbiological spectrum and clinical outcomes were evaluated.

Results

There were significantly more UPIC cases in rTHA 196/751 (26.1 %) compared to rTKA 113/679 (16.6 %); (p < 0.001). UPICs in rTKA and rTHA have a lower septic and aseptic implant-free-survival compared to CN revisions. Patients with a history of nickel allergy have a higher risk of an UPIC in rTHA and rTKA (p < 0.001). Septic re-revisions after UPIC had a significantly (H: p = 0.004; K: p = 0.030) shorter time period to the primary/previous surgery (H: 84 (IQR:41–797); K: 115 (IQR:55–446)) compared to patients with aseptic re-revisions after UPIC (H:1248 (IQR:178-3534); K: 827 (IQR:361-1183)).

Conclusion

UPICs have a higher rate of septic and aseptic failure than CN outcomes. UPICs are twice as common in rTHA compared to rTKA. Preoperative PJI workup reduces the UPIC rate. Nickel allergy is a risk factor for UPIC. Early revisions with UPICs after primary THA or TKA have a higher risk of septic failure.

The translational potential of this article

This article provides new information on revision rates for UPIC and potential risk factors for UPIC and its treatment failure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Translation
Journal of Orthopaedic Translation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.60%
发文量
91
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Translation (JOT) is the official peer-reviewed, open access journal of the Chinese Speaking Orthopaedic Society (CSOS) and the International Chinese Musculoskeletal Research Society (ICMRS). It is published quarterly, in January, April, July and October, by Elsevier.
期刊最新文献
Innovative development of robot reduction system in geriatric pelvic fractures: A single-center case series in Beijing, China Recent developments in Achilles tendon risk-analyzing rupture factors for enhanced injury prevention and clinical guidance: Current implications of regenerative medicine Zhuangyao Jianshen Wan ameliorates senile osteoporosis in SAMP6 mice through Modulation of the GCN5L1-mediated PI3K/Akt/wnt signaling pathway Sensory nerve EP4 facilitates heterotopic ossification by regulating angiogenesis-coupled bone formation Mesoporous bioactive glass-enhanced MSC-derived exosomes promote bone regeneration and immunomodulation in vitro and in vivo
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1