通过实验提高病毒丰度对不同生态系统类型土壤碳循环的影响

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109556
Ernest D. Osburn , Sara G. Baer , Sarah E. Evans , Steven G. McBride , Michael S. Strickland
{"title":"通过实验提高病毒丰度对不同生态系统类型土壤碳循环的影响","authors":"Ernest D. Osburn ,&nbsp;Sara G. Baer ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Evans ,&nbsp;Steven G. McBride ,&nbsp;Michael S. Strickland","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Viruses are abundant and diverse members of soil communities, but their influences on soil biogeochemical cycling are poorly understood. To assess the potential for viruses to influence soil carbon (C) cycling in varying environmental contexts, we sampled soils from four contrasting ecosystem types across the continental United States: conifer forest, broadleaf deciduous forest, tallgrass prairie, and agricultural cropland. We then experimentally increased virus abundance in the soils by inoculating microcosms with virus concentrates isolated from the same original soils and incubated the soils for 14 days. The virus-treated conifer forest and prairie soils respired significantly less C (14 μg and 10 μg less C per gram of soil, respectively) over the course of the 14-day incubation compared with control soils, though the effects were proportionally small in magnitude (3% and 6% reductions in cumulative respiration, respectively). Following the initial 14-day incubation, we conducted a<sup>13</sup>C-glucose tracer incubation. In contrast to the initial incubation, after glucose addition we observed effects on respiration only in the agricultural soil, where respiration of soil organic matter-derived C nearly doubled in the virus-treated soils compared with control soils. We also observed overall reduced incorporation of <sup>13</sup>C into microbial biomass (<em>i.e.</em>, lower growth yield) and lower carbon use efficiency on average in all virus-treated soils. These results demonstrate that viruses can influence overall microbial metabolism but with different aggregate effects on soil C balance across soil types depending on soil physicochemical properties. Overall, our study demonstrates that viral influences on soil microorganisms can manifest in altered fates of soil C, with either increased or decreased respiratory C loss depending on ecosystem type.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 109556"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of experimentally elevated virus abundance on soil carbon cycling across varying ecosystem types\",\"authors\":\"Ernest D. Osburn ,&nbsp;Sara G. Baer ,&nbsp;Sarah E. Evans ,&nbsp;Steven G. McBride ,&nbsp;Michael S. Strickland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Viruses are abundant and diverse members of soil communities, but their influences on soil biogeochemical cycling are poorly understood. To assess the potential for viruses to influence soil carbon (C) cycling in varying environmental contexts, we sampled soils from four contrasting ecosystem types across the continental United States: conifer forest, broadleaf deciduous forest, tallgrass prairie, and agricultural cropland. We then experimentally increased virus abundance in the soils by inoculating microcosms with virus concentrates isolated from the same original soils and incubated the soils for 14 days. The virus-treated conifer forest and prairie soils respired significantly less C (14 μg and 10 μg less C per gram of soil, respectively) over the course of the 14-day incubation compared with control soils, though the effects were proportionally small in magnitude (3% and 6% reductions in cumulative respiration, respectively). Following the initial 14-day incubation, we conducted a<sup>13</sup>C-glucose tracer incubation. In contrast to the initial incubation, after glucose addition we observed effects on respiration only in the agricultural soil, where respiration of soil organic matter-derived C nearly doubled in the virus-treated soils compared with control soils. We also observed overall reduced incorporation of <sup>13</sup>C into microbial biomass (<em>i.e.</em>, lower growth yield) and lower carbon use efficiency on average in all virus-treated soils. These results demonstrate that viruses can influence overall microbial metabolism but with different aggregate effects on soil C balance across soil types depending on soil physicochemical properties. Overall, our study demonstrates that viral influences on soil microorganisms can manifest in altered fates of soil C, with either increased or decreased respiratory C loss depending on ecosystem type.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil Biology & Biochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071724002451\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071724002451","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

病毒是土壤群落中丰富多样的成员,但人们对它们对土壤生物地球化学循环的影响却知之甚少。为了评估病毒在不同环境条件下影响土壤碳(C)循环的潜力,我们从美国大陆四种截然不同的生态系统类型中采集了土壤样本:针叶林、落叶阔叶林、高草草原和农田。然后,我们将从相同的原始土壤中分离出的病毒浓缩物接种到微型培养皿中,并将土壤培养 14 天,以此实验性地提高土壤中的病毒丰度。与对照土壤相比,经过病毒处理的针叶林土壤和草原土壤在 14 天的培养过程中呼吸的碳量明显减少(每克土壤分别减少 14 微克和 10 微克碳),但影响程度很小(累积呼吸量分别减少 3% 和 6%)。在最初的 14 天培养之后,我们进行了葡萄糖示踪培养。与初始培养不同的是,在添加葡萄糖后,我们只观察到农用土壤的呼吸作用受到影响,与对照土壤相比,病毒处理过的土壤有机质衍生 C 的呼吸作用几乎翻了一番。我们还观察到,在所有病毒处理过的土壤中,碳在微生物生物量中的结合率总体下降(生长产量降低),碳利用效率平均降低。这些结果表明,病毒会影响微生物的整体新陈代谢,但根据土壤理化性质的不同,病毒对不同类型土壤的碳平衡会产生不同的综合影响。总之,我们的研究表明,病毒对土壤微生物的影响会改变土壤碳的命运,根据生态系统类型的不同,呼吸性碳损失会增加或减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of experimentally elevated virus abundance on soil carbon cycling across varying ecosystem types

Viruses are abundant and diverse members of soil communities, but their influences on soil biogeochemical cycling are poorly understood. To assess the potential for viruses to influence soil carbon (C) cycling in varying environmental contexts, we sampled soils from four contrasting ecosystem types across the continental United States: conifer forest, broadleaf deciduous forest, tallgrass prairie, and agricultural cropland. We then experimentally increased virus abundance in the soils by inoculating microcosms with virus concentrates isolated from the same original soils and incubated the soils for 14 days. The virus-treated conifer forest and prairie soils respired significantly less C (14 μg and 10 μg less C per gram of soil, respectively) over the course of the 14-day incubation compared with control soils, though the effects were proportionally small in magnitude (3% and 6% reductions in cumulative respiration, respectively). Following the initial 14-day incubation, we conducted a13C-glucose tracer incubation. In contrast to the initial incubation, after glucose addition we observed effects on respiration only in the agricultural soil, where respiration of soil organic matter-derived C nearly doubled in the virus-treated soils compared with control soils. We also observed overall reduced incorporation of 13C into microbial biomass (i.e., lower growth yield) and lower carbon use efficiency on average in all virus-treated soils. These results demonstrate that viruses can influence overall microbial metabolism but with different aggregate effects on soil C balance across soil types depending on soil physicochemical properties. Overall, our study demonstrates that viral influences on soil microorganisms can manifest in altered fates of soil C, with either increased or decreased respiratory C loss depending on ecosystem type.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Hyphosphere core taxa link plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi combinations to soil organic phosphorus mineralization Contributions of microbial necromass and plant lignin to soil organic carbon stock in a paddy field under simulated conditions of long-term elevated CO2 and warming Tree species-dependent effects of urbanization and plant invasion on deadwood biota and decomposition rates Virome responses to heating of a forest soil suggest that most dsDNA viral particles do not persist at 90°C Simulated erosion of A horizon influences the dissolved organic matter chemodiversity and carbon sequestration of B horizon in Mollisols
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1